Breaking: Romney’s A Yes On Witnesses

Hot Air ^ | January 31, 2020 | Ed Morrissey

[kabar]

The Dems want to regain control of the Senate before RBG croaks. Confirmations are a political weapon.

The trap has been getting the Rep senators to vote on witnesses and conviction. The longer the trial goes on, the more damaging votes for Reps.

[kabar]

What is the advantage for Pence to drag on the trial?

[Openurmind]

Of course there would not be knowing Pence, please read back in my replies to origin of thought.

[jersey117]

At the very least they should look into the FISA abuse, the dossier and the spying on the Trump team.

[Truthoverpower]

Primary time!

[jersey117]

I thought Jay Sekalow made clear that if they call Bolton he was going to call witnesses he wants. Sounded to me like he was ready to drag it before the courts.

[Savage Beast]

So are the Democrats really willing to have Schiff, Nadler, the “Whistleblower,” and the Bidens interrogated under oath?

[tennmountainman]

I can almost understand Collins. She is from a moderate state.
But Romney? He is just a anti Trump prick.

[Hiddigeigei]

Witnesses for the defense:
Schiff
Biden 1
Biden 2
The so-called whistleblower (actually a schiff co-conspirator)
(partial list... others to follow)
Rudy Giuliani?

[1Old Pro]

I can almost understand Collins. She is from a moderate state. But Romney? He is just a anti Trump prick.

Yep, Romney hates himself and his loser life, it's the only explanation.

[Beach333]

Remember the Obamaphone lady? She said the same thing!

[Jack Hammer]

Didn’t we all really know that Romney needs a spine....

[kabar]

I read them. What is your point?

[100American]

This thread is dead, Murkowski voted no and the measure lost 51-49

[urtax$@work]

So what is the big deal on new witnesses....?

Couldn’t the GOP call new wits too?
including Biden Jr....

or is this whole no more witnesses mantra
just to get this trial over with ??