To: rollo tomasi
You raise excellent points; however, I doubt Ciaramella would prove to be a helpful witness (and I am not sure you argue for that).
IMO, the R's would be better served to call a witness that could testify to Ciaramella's intimate involvement and disqualifying bias. If the defense looses the witness issue it may come to that.
237 posted on
01/30/2020 11:19:12 AM PST by
frog in a pot
( "It's not enough to hold winning cards, ya gotta' know how to bet 'em.")
To: frog in a pot
Ciaramella would be Mifsud II.
239 posted on
01/30/2020 11:20:04 AM PST by
combat_boots
(God bless Israel and all who protect and defend her. Merry Christmas! In God We Trust!)
To: frog in a pot
No not at this time, the best course is to end this farce either tomorrow night or Saturday.
If there happens to be witnesses, call Schiff (Will appeal) and also go to court over the 18th’s testimony. Then you subpoena Ciaramella and VINDMAN under the threat of perjury/prosecution.
248 posted on
01/30/2020 11:26:32 AM PST by
rollo tomasi
(Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson