Yuge win!
Homerun!!
Yes!
This shouldn't even be up for discussion, much less need a SC ruling to uphold. Good Grief!!
Winning!!!!!
Winning!!!!
Winning!!!
The USA has had these laws on the books since Ellis Island. We certainly do not need to import more poor dependents now..
The Supreme Court barely eeks out a common-sense ruling. As usual, the Bolsheviks on the left vote to tear down the country.
They could always cite British law as precedent. The Brits sentenced a little boy, Alfie Evans, to die in UK’s Alder Hey Hospital on the basis that a hospital in Italy willing to take him might be successful in helping him to recover where he could pose a future threat on the UK’s socialized medicine system.
100% certainty Anthony Kennedy would have voted with the libs on this.
Win, Win, WIN!
Temporary?
And how is this even an issue, it’s been the “Law” for decades.
My LEGAL immigrant friends had some pretty good parties when their Bond was refunded.
For some that was the last income they needed to retire young.
Wasn’t this already the law?
Ever noticed that when the libs lose 5-4 it’s a “divided court” but when they win it’s a “decisive decision”?
It’s been part of the immigration laws since 1884.
“Using benefits like Medicaid, housing assistance or food stamps could render a person inadmissible.”
****
As an immigrant, MOST green-card holders KNOW THIS. I knew it well. And MOST of us smart immigrants KNOW that once you apply for ANY welfare, you will have a harder time getting citizenship.
The rightward shift in the judiciary will be felt for years to come. And the shift will continue for at least 5 more years.
The rightward shift in the judiciary will be felt for years to come. And the shift will continue for at least 5 more years.
Local courts will ignore the ruling and make more of their own.
Ruth Bader Ginsburg - age 86
Stephen Breyer - age 81
Replacing just those two judicial activists would go a long way toward restoring the rule of law.
Clarence Thomas - age 71
Samuel Alito - age 69
While I am very happy with both, President Trump replacing them three to four years from now with equally strict originalists would protect freedom for another generation.
Sonia Sotomayor - age 65
Elena Kagan - age 59
Neither of the above enemies of the state are young enough that our odds of them retiring are good. We can hope they will become frustrated with watching the Court protect the Constitution, or that they will choose to spend more time with their families, but I’d bet that they would happily shrivel up in place, just like RBG, to protect the “penumbra” and their created right to murder the innocent unborn.
John Roberts - age 64
I was hopeful, but when he protected Obamacare, I dismissed him completely. He is not an open enemy, but he is also no friend to the Constitution.
Brett Kavanaugh - age 54
Neil Gorsuch - age 52
These two may be the most important part of President Trump’s legacy, other than protecting our border. I’d love to see seven more Trump appointees just like them! Age matters. I want more justices who are age 49-53, old enough to have a proven track record but young enough to have many good years left in their careers.
Having the Federalist Society and the Heritage Foundation screen potential nominees seems to be working. President Reagan failed with Sandra Day O’Connor and with Anthony Kennedy. George H. W. Bush failed with David Souter. America’s enemies on the left never fail, and we need to be as focused on finding those with a rational judicial philosophy as the globalist left is on finding activists with no concern for the rule of law.
This is already the Law.
What an upside down world we live in.