Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gswilder
Right. But in legal terms there's a huge difference between: (1) "believing" (even with almost 100% certainty) that Ciaramella is the whistleblower, and (2) establishing through the records of the ongoing proceedings that he is.
63 posted on 01/23/2020 9:49:13 AM PST by Alberta's Child (In the time of chimpanzees I was a monkey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

Hey - you left out “feelings”. That goes a long way to describe how a dem comes up with their conclusions/decisions.

How many times did we hear them tell us in the hearings what they JUST KNEW the president did or was going to do??? Or what he was thinking of doing therefore he needed to be STOPPED!!


76 posted on 01/23/2020 12:29:25 PM PST by Thank You Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson