Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GAO finds Trump administration broke law by withholding aid from Ukraine
The Hill ^ | 01/16/20 10:06 AM EST | BY REBECCA KLAR

Posted on 01/16/2020 7:57:13 AM PST by Swordmaker

The Trump administration violated the law by withholding appropriated security assistance to Ukraine, the Government Accountability Office said Thursday in a report.

The independent watchdog said the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) withheld the appropriated funds last summer.

The report said U.S. law “does not permit the president to substitute his own policy priorities for those that Congress has enacted into law.”

“Therefore, we conclude that OMB violated the [Impound Control Act],” GAO said.

The withholding of the aid is central to the ongoing impeachment proceedings against President Trump.

--This breaking news report will be updated.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bs; gao; impeachment; presidenttrump; trumpukraine; ukraine
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-171 next last
To: gibsonguy

Agree 100% with your post. Sad to see conservatives be so divided on this. It’s exactly what the Dems want. Fighting amongst ourselves instead of on offense against them.

Graham should have the dirtbag GAO honcho in front of his committee at 9 am monday and under oath. This is a transparent partisan political stunt. That Graham will not do that is 100% on him and the GOP Senate. Nobody else to blame for their do-nothingness.


81 posted on 01/16/2020 8:39:02 AM PST by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

WATCH: Joe Biden Brags About Rigging The Ukranian Political System

WATCH: Joe Biden Brags About Rigging The Ukranian Political System

82 posted on 01/16/2020 8:40:11 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lodi90

Or, it is not worth his time to be concerned with such a losing gambit


83 posted on 01/16/2020 8:40:34 AM PST by bert ( (KE. NP. N.C. +12) Progressives are existential American enemies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: gibsonguy

all gop votes to acquit and maybe 2 or 3 rats


84 posted on 01/16/2020 8:41:32 AM PST by italianquaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

Corrupt Federal Government Organizations - bump for later....


85 posted on 01/16/2020 8:41:59 AM PST by indthkr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Torahman

“GAO decisions do not come out of thin air. WHO are the people (Names and faces) who did this. Inquiring minds want to know.”

Pelosi, Schiff, to name a few...


86 posted on 01/16/2020 8:43:34 AM PST by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: gibsonguy

“Obama broke the law in Bergdahl release deal, GAO report says” https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/Politics-Voices/2014/0825/Obama-broke-the-law-in-Bergdahl-release-deal-GAO-report-says


87 posted on 01/16/2020 8:45:16 AM PST by BurgessKoch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

This comes out today? All orchestrated. I’m beginning to think that Trump is going to be removed from office and there’s nothing that can prevent it. CNN and the talking heads will run with this, the majority of American’s will think it’s 100% true as stated, Trump is done, period.

Just F@#$


88 posted on 01/16/2020 8:50:06 AM PST by GulfMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker
The Hill has added to the article, citing the GAO making conclusions about WHY the President delayed the aid. . . Which is WAY beyond their official charter to do. This is far beyond their authority and steps into the political making a farce of them being “non-partisan.”

The updated article now reads:

The Trump administration’s decision to freeze the release of security assistance to Ukraine last year violated federal law, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) said in a report Thursday.

The independent watchdog said the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB) withheld the appropriated funds last summer, not as a programmatic delay but in order to advance the president’s own agenda.

Doing so, the watchdog concluded, violates the Impoundment Control Act, a law that governs Congress's role in the federal budget process.

“Faithful execution of the law does not permit the President to substitute his own policy priorities for those that Congress has enacted into law,” the report says. “OMB withheld funds for a policy reason, which is not permitted under the Impoundment Control Act (ICA). ... Therefore, we conclude that OMB violated the ICA.”

The decision by the White House to withhold nearly $400 million in U.S. aid to Kyiv as the country fights pro-Russia separatists is at the center of impeachment proceedings in Congress against President Trump.

The report's release comes as the GOP-controlled Senate is expected to set a time on Thursday for the House impeachment managers — who will be arguing the case to impeach and remove Trump before the Senate — to formally exhibit the articles of impeachment accusing Trump of abuse of power and obstruction of Congress.

The procedure comes one day after the Democratic managers silently marched the two articles over to the Senate, kickstarting the Senate trial into Trump’s contacts with Ukraine.

Democrats, who impeached Trump on the two charges last month, allege that he dangled the promise of aid and a White House meeting as leverage to get Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to open investigations into former Vice President Joe Biden, a 2020 political rival, and Biden's son Hunter.

They say the White House then sought to obstruct their impeachment inquiry by blocking the testimony of any current and former White House officials, while asserting absolute immunity over their testimony.


89 posted on 01/16/2020 8:51:19 AM PST by Swordmaker (My pistol self-identifies as an iPad, so you must accept it in gun-free zones, you hoplophobe bigot!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

Check the background.

An Obama appointee made this decision. The OMB says they are wrong. Says delays in disbursements are normal in these situation. OMB is actually the people that manages disbursements

Just another example of the total political corruption of the Democrat Fascist party. Any judgement by a Democrat appointee of this sort in the last 3 years, Judicial or otherwise, has been overturned by higher authority as being merit-less


90 posted on 01/16/2020 8:52:27 AM PST by MNJohnnie (They would have abandon leftism to achieve sanity. Freeper Olog-hai)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

FOX BREAKING NEWS

THEY ARE TOTALLY ON-BOARD WITH THIS SHAM
91 posted on 01/16/2020 8:53:52 AM PST by GulfMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook
The original memo from the GAO is here, and it is interesting reading.

It looks like an extreme stretch by the GAO, which is far from non-partisan. Under their logic there would be essentially no circumstance where the executive branch could even delay payment of foreign aid that had been appropriated by the congress. So, using their logic, once the congress votes to fund some overseas aid the aid gets sent regardless of events that might occur in the area of foreign policy. That's an absurd interpretation of the law.

Under the GAO interpretation, the executive branch would be forced to send previously appropriated military aid to a country even if, for example, the foreign government was ousted by rebels and replaced with a marxist dictatorship. Does anybody really think that is what the law requires?

Of course not, we're just seeing more Democratic party nonsense in their never ending efforts to attack President Trump.

92 posted on 01/16/2020 8:54:02 AM PST by freeandfreezing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Demian

Check the background.

An Obama appointee made this decision. The OMB says they are wrong. Says delays in disbursements are normal in these situation. OMB is actually the people that manages disbursements

Just another example of the total political corruption of the Democrat Fascist party. Any judgement by a Democrat appointee of this sort in the last 3 years, Judicial or otherwise, has been overturned by higher authority as being merit-less


93 posted on 01/16/2020 8:56:23 AM PST by MNJohnnie (They would have abandon leftism to achieve sanity. Freeper Olog-hai)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: BurgessKoch

Good analogy. Thanks. So, as we all can see, the GAO’s only power rests with whether the real PTB chooses to do anything about it.


94 posted on 01/16/2020 8:56:29 AM PST by gloryblaze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Williams
"Suppose that election had gone to a candidate who was a pro-Russian? Suppose further that newly elected pro-Russian Ukrainian President threw in with Vladamir Putin and joined him in his plans to reconstruct the Russian Empire, turned and with Russia militarily attacked their neighbors. Tell me, would President Trump still be obligated to expend those foreign aid military funds, sending javelin missiles, and support the new Ukraine regime, or would he be justified in making the decision to hold that aid in light of the change in international conditions?"

That's an excellent hypothetical, and given the recent history of the Ukraine, it is not at all far-fetched. Much foreign aid has a direct connection to national security, and is thus within the purview of the president.
95 posted on 01/16/2020 8:58:40 AM PST by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Artcore
"And no mention of Biden on tape bragging about withholding aid?"

Excellent point.
96 posted on 01/16/2020 9:00:00 AM PST by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: babble-on

Check the background. Law does NOT say they have to be dispersed immediately, says they have to be dispersed “by the end of the fiscal year. They were so this GAO announcements is pure partisan drivel without a shred of fact to it.

An Obama appointee made this decision. The OMB says they are wrong. Says delays in disbursements are normal in these situation. OMB is actually the people that manages disbursements

Just another example of the total political corruption of the Democrat Fascist party. Any judgement by a Democrat appointee of this sort in the last 3 years, Judicial or otherwise, has been overturned by higher authority as being merit-less


97 posted on 01/16/2020 9:01:21 AM PST by MNJohnnie (They would have abandon leftism to achieve sanity. Freeper Olog-hai)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

But the MSM got the headline they wanted.


98 posted on 01/16/2020 9:01:51 AM PST by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

Yes, and once the whistleblower came out and said the felony was being committed they released the money. How can that be a crime?


99 posted on 01/16/2020 9:06:32 AM PST by babble-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: nwrep; Westbrook
Title X of the Act, also known as the Impoundment Control Act of 1974, specifies that the President may request that Congress rescind appropriated funds. If both the Senate and the House of Representatives have not approved a rescission proposal (by passing legislation) within 45 days of continuous session, any funds being withheld must be made available for obligation.

But rescission is for permanently cancelling the spending of allocated or budgeted funds, it is not for just a hold on spending. There is no requirement there for involvement on a hold. There’s whole procedure for rescission, but not for a temporary hold.

On other thing I have noted before is that this particular law, especially where foreign aid is concerned, has never been tested for constitutionality. I think it would fail. It’s not constitutional. This is Congress putting its policy on Foreign Policy when the Constitution very plainly makes the President the controller of foreign policy, not a committee of 535 in Congress.

100 posted on 01/16/2020 9:06:57 AM PST by Swordmaker (My pistol self-identifies as an iPad, so you must accept it in gun-free zones, you hoplophobe bigot!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-171 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson