Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No, killing Soleimani doesn’t mean war
spector.us ^ | 1/5/2020 | Daniel McCarthy

Posted on 01/05/2020 10:30:33 AM PST by bitt

Maybe Trump’s critics are just as wrong as they’ve been every other time

Everybody knows Donald Trump is going to start a war. His critics have been saying so since his first year in office — remember the war with North Korea they predicted right after Trump tweeted about unleashing ‘fire and fury’ on the Little Rocket Man? That war didn’t happen. Nor did an insurgency break out when President Trump moved the US embassy in Israel to Jerusalem, an act that the Trump haters were certain would incite waves of violence and unquenchable turmoil. But maybe the third time’s the charm — maybe the killing of Gen. Qasem Soleimani, leader of the Quds Force division of Iran’s Revolutionary Guard, in a US airstrike in Iraq will finally give the president’s detractors the war they’ve been anticipating.

Or maybe not — maybe the critics are just as wrong as they’ve been every other time: about wars that Trump didn’t start, about collusion with Russia that didn’t happen, about the crash of America’s economy…the list goes on. The president should be reassured to have enemies who are so reliably wrong.

Iran’s Islamic revolutionary regime might well want revenge. But is avenging Soleimani worth risking the regime’s existence? If killing him was an act of war, is this a war Iran is prepared to fight and win? How, exactly? Iran couldn’t win a war with Saddam Hussein’s Iraq in the 1980s. Contrary to what neoconservatives might want you to think, Iran has not become a military superpower akin to Nazi Germany in the 30-odd years since then. Also contrary to what neoconservatives sometimes say, Iran is not irrational to the point of being suicidal. But some panicky anti-war supporters of President Trump have adopted this implausible view of Tehran. ..

(Excerpt) Read more at spectator.us ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iran; iraq; qasemsoleimani; qudsforce; soleimani
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

1 posted on 01/05/2020 10:30:33 AM PST by bitt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; azishot; AZ .44 MAG; Baynative; ..

p


2 posted on 01/05/2020 10:30:46 AM PST by bitt (A FRIVOLOUS impeachment vote is a SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

It may mean war as far as Iran is concerned.

But of course, Iran declared war on the U.S. years ago...


3 posted on 01/05/2020 10:32:43 AM PST by Jim W N (MAGA by restoring the Gospel of the Grace of Christ and our Free Constitutional Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

The democrats are already too busy fighting the United States citizens


5 posted on 01/05/2020 10:36:09 AM PST by dsrtsage (Complexity is merely simplicity lacking imagination)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bitt

If anything, it might have delayed a war for a decade or so.


6 posted on 01/05/2020 10:36:32 AM PST by Pilgrim's Progress (http://www.baptistbiblebelievers.com/BYTOPICS/tabid/335/Default.aspx D)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

If Japan had bombed Pearl Harbor during Trump’s term, Democrats would complain that he might start a war. Obama’s previous term would have been 8 years of appeasing and apologizing to Hitler. Maybe even a Germany deal giving them everything they wanted.


7 posted on 01/05/2020 10:36:42 AM PST by Telepathic Intruder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

No one is taking the long view. Whatever power that Soleimani had within Iran, he was clearly the linchpin of Iran’s external efforts — all of them. Even with Soleimani fully in charge, these efforts were imploding as the resources to fund them dried up.

So as Iran is dealing with some of the greatest internal unrest since the Shah was deposed. And the hammer being used to manage, incentivize and discipline extra-national forces is now dead at a time when Iran’s resources and influence were already waning.

If I am Hezbollah, what is my prediction vis-a-vis Iran going forward? What do the Iraqis anticipate? And so forth. It can’t be anything other than grim; and clearly even grimmer today than three days ago.

Iran can assert all they want that they will now go on the offensive against the US, but the situation unambiguously points to the need for Iran to be defending the entrenched interests it already has in place and that are exceedingly vulnerable at this pregnant moment in history.

To strike boldly at the US now would be an act of desperation rather than rational and calculating strategy. Even if the Iranians could pull this off, their best move would be to bide their time and deal with more imminent matters first.


8 posted on 01/05/2020 10:39:13 AM PST by drellberg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

I am certainly not a foreign policy expert, but I tend to agree with this article.

More of the same would not have provided any deterrent effect. It was past time to up the ante.


9 posted on 01/05/2020 10:40:02 AM PST by independentmind (Sticks and stones will break my bones, but words will never hurt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

No, killing Soleimani doesn’t mean the war is over.


10 posted on 01/05/2020 10:40:39 AM PST by null and void (The government wants to disarm us after 243 yrs 'cuz they plan to do things we would shoot them for!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Persia is 7000 miles away. Everyone here in armed. Go for it mullahs


11 posted on 01/05/2020 10:47:09 AM PST by Truthoverpower (The guv mint you get is the Trump winning express !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt
POTUS tweeted that Suleimani was responsible for hundreds of recent deaths of IRANIAN protesters (see link below).

There will be no war between the US and Iran involving Troop engagement. President Trump will not send US Troops into Iran. He doesn't need to. He has tens of millions of people on the ground already who will gladly do that for him. The Iranian People are boiling over.

From last month and still ongoing:
With Brutal Crackdown, Iran Convulsed by Worst Unrest in 40 Years
https://theunionjournal.com/with-brutal-crackdown-iran-convulsed-by-worst-unrest-in-40-years-2

We will see with near certainty that President Trump backs the Iranian PEOPLE to overthrow their maniacal REGIME. They are so fed up.

Massive numbers of Iranian protesters not seen since the 1979 Islamic Revolution are now openly demonstrating against the Regime and hundreds are giving their lives in the protest. That is significant. Iran is very unstable much like the Soviet Union in 1989. We can see the era of Islamic terror brought to an historic end just as we saw the fall of the USSR.

Note the Iranian people are NOT ARMED except for a very few that get arms through black markets smuggled into the region. It is entirely possible perhaps probable that weapons are being supplied through Northern Syria through Southern Turkey into Northern Iran. The southern part of Turkey is populated by rural farmers and Turkish soldiers there can easily be made to look the other way just as they are made now with respect to black market oil from Iran brought in by truck convoys destined for Turkish oil ports. It is very possible that the arms supply chain via black marketers will be ratcheted up into Iran to protesters there. Now is the time.

Iranians remember when they had a society that was not obsessed with Islam, they remember they had a thriving middle class, a stable and good life, an economy that provided all basics including the ability to feed themselves. None of this exists today. But it's more than just economic hardship, the Iranian people are fed up with the whole Islamic ideology that leans on them. For years they have had regime spies watching their every move, listening to their every word and taking actions against them for failing to submit to the harsh Mullah rule. Their parents and grandparents REMEMBER when it was different. They have photo albums they keep hidden showing the good life they had. Now they are willing to die to bring it back.

Iranian family before the 1979 Islamic revolution (1960s)

Days after the revolution in 1979, a compulsory Hijab ruling was introduced. The regime issued up to 70 lashes or months of imprisonment for disobeying. Women were banned from being judges.

The legal age of marriage for girls was reduced to 9 and then raised to 13.

President Trump need not send American troops into Iran. He will cripple the Regime there with missile and drone strikes and he can help enable the Iranian people to oust their regime's leaders and break the ruling network. I believe President Trump will help them.

To get a sense of how angry the Iranian people are with their 'Deep State', imagine if the Democrats through blackmail and coercion are able to impeach and remove both President Trump and Vice President Pence, then swear in Nancy Pelosi as President who moves immediately to order the US Army to put down any insurrection and to disarm and confiscate guns followed by a very harsh doctrine of political correctness that Americans must comply with or they will be marked as domestic terrorists and dealt with accordingly.

As Americans we pray the Iranian people see freedom soon and pray that President Trump helps the Iranian people to oust the awful regime that rules over them allowing them to return to the society of their fathers and mothers.

Please copy and share this post. Send it to as many friends, family, and associates as possible.

12 posted on 01/05/2020 10:52:28 AM PST by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt
No, killing Soleimani doesn’t mean war

Yeah, the Iranian invasion force has been ordered to stand down.

13 posted on 01/05/2020 10:52:48 AM PST by higgmeister ( In the Shadow of The Big Chicken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt
No, killing Soleimani doesn’t mean war

Yeah, the Iranian invasion force has been ordered to stand down.

14 posted on 01/05/2020 10:52:48 AM PST by higgmeister ( In the Shadow of The Big Chicken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

We have been at war with Iran for about 4 decades, its not over, but I think Trump deescalated it for a bit.

If anything, this proved the Iranians are not that bright in the first place, who puts their 2nd in command out on the battlefield in a foreign land like that? Its amateur hour.

2nd in command in two car loads of other high value targets, these terrorists were planning something big and we destroyed them.

Iran is embarrassed right now, they just got bested by a Real Estate developer/Reality TV host. They are full of empty threats right now, they finally realized they are truly powerless.


15 posted on 01/05/2020 10:58:16 AM PST by Trump.Deplorable
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
Yeah, but, but the murder of Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto of the Imperial Japanese Navy caused World War II!!!!! /s

16 posted on 01/05/2020 10:59:59 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: drellberg
What you said is all true, imho -- but that doesn't mean the mullahcracy won't strike in a desperate act. I suspect their main blow will be against Europe, or less possibly through greater spending on internal enemies, like the Jihad Squad, and nearby problems, like illegals at our southern border.

17 posted on 01/05/2020 11:02:46 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bitt
The attack on Soleimani will lead to more violence and destabilize the Middle East.

I can't say that with a straight face...

18 posted on 01/05/2020 11:10:56 AM PST by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Soleimani was a power control threat to Ali Khamenei


19 posted on 01/05/2020 11:13:03 AM PST by mason-dixon (As Mason said to Dixon, you have to draw the line somewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

That first picture is the Shah. While life was pretty good before the revolution, using the friggin’ king as an example is kind of lame.

I went to college with Iranian midshipmen. They were tossed out of the country in March 1980. The next semester some of them came back. The stories they told about life there, and what it took to get out couldn’t be made into a movie because the pussies in Hollywood would think it fantasy.

It opened my eyes to what a shit hole the Middle East is, and how smart people, as a group, can become pretty stupid.


20 posted on 01/05/2020 11:18:14 AM PST by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson