Posted on 12/11/2019 5:41:08 AM PST by janetjanet998
10 am at the Senate Committee on the Judiciary hearing: Examining the Inspector Generals Report on Alleged Abuses of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.
DiFi giving Horowitz the opportunity to give the MSM the talking points for the rest of the day...
I think that, if they thought they could get away with it, Congress would vote to impeach and convict in a heartbeat.
Pretty sure I saw him interviewed and he admitted to being an asset, but I thought it was CIA.
Old man Leahy now mentioning the Trump statement that he wanted Russia to hack Hillary’s email. the poor bastard still has no clue that it was a GD joke.
Rehearsal is the right word. It’s almost like he knows what question she’s going to ask next. He even reaches for notebooks before a question is asked
“Hope several individuals are charged and prosecuted for their alleged crimes.”
“Alleged”?
BOOM to Leahy.
Opening different than the rest where IG says it gets murky.
Note the purple tie on Leaky.
It was never proven that Russia hacked the DNC. The server was never given to the FBI for forensic analysis.
It was a report written by Crowdstrike, paid for by the DNC. The FBI admitted that it never read Crowdstrike’s report, just the summary.
What untruthful response has he given?
So it seems that, based on Horowitz’s testimony, Feinstein blurted out classified information when, in her opening, she identified Australia as the “friendly government” that was instrumental in the initial opening of the investigation.
I agree. And half of them would forget by the next day what happened..
Thanks. I have seen it. Please remember that Barr’s and Durham’s jobs are different than Horowitz’s.
Leahy sounds as detached as Biden, Clinton, Feinstein, Pelosi, etc.
All these lifetime politicians are not mentally fit for office (Republicans included).
A friendly government. Snort. The Aussies weren’t the only ones aiding and abetting Americans committing sedition.
Just checking in on this hearing now. Did I miss anything important? Any bombshells?
It’s absolutely striking that obvious political bias isn’t clear to Horowitz....he’s riding a fence between both sides but far more favorable , also obvious to the Demorats questions.
It’s like he wants to give the Dems a bigger piece of his report pie than the Repub’s.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.