Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pentagon chief asks for Navy secretary’s resignation over private proposal in Navy SEAL’s case
WaPo ^ | November 24, 2019 at 1:46 p.m. PST | Ashley Parker, Dan Lamothe

Posted on 11/24/2019 2:10:40 PM PST by jazusamo

Defense Secretary Mark T. Esper asked for the resignation of Navy Secretary Richard V. Spencer on Sunday after losing confidence in him over his handling of the case of a Navy SEAL accused of war crimes in Iraq, the Pentagon said.

Spencer’s resignation came in the wake of the controversial case of Chief Petty Officer Edward Gallagher, a Navy SEAL who was accused of war crimes on a 2017 deployment. He was acquitted of murder but convicted in July of posing with the corpse of a captive.

Esper asked for Spencer’s resignation after learning that he had privately proposed to White House officials that if they did not interfere with proceedings against Gallagher, then Spencer would ensure that Gallagher was able to retire as a Navy SEAL, with his Trident insignia.

Spencer’s private proposal to the White House — which he did not share with Esper over the course of several conversations about the matter — contradicted his public position on the Gallagher case, chief Pentagon spokesman Jonathan Hoffman said in a statement.

Esper said in the statement that he was “deeply troubled by this conduct.”

“Unfortunately, as a result I have determined that Secretary Spencer no longer has my confidence to continue in his position," Esper said. "I wish Richard well.”

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cpoeddiegallagher; edwardgallagher; gallagher; navsecresigns; navsecspenser; navyseal; richardspencer; richardspenser; secdefesper; trump; usnavy; yourefired
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-113 next last
To: jazusamo

Spencer’s big argument was that the board would be run by SEAL NCOs who make the call. Yet his purposed secret deal reveals that this was a complete sham, as Spencer claimed the ability to secretly direct the board’s decision. So not only did he go behind Esper’s back, he revealed himself as a liar.


81 posted on 11/24/2019 6:25:18 PM PST by Stingray51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei
Spencer was on the record Friday opening defying the President. He is not the good guy here.

That is an auto fail move right there. You don't have to like the order, you don't get to challenge it in the media.

Navy Secretary Richard Spencer said on Friday a Navy SEAL convicted of battlefield misconduct should face a board of peers weighing whether to oust him from the elite force, despite President Donald Trump's assertion that he not be expelled.

82 posted on 11/24/2019 7:27:49 PM PST by MNJohnnie (They would have to abandon leftism to achieve sanity. Freeper Olog-hai)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
I am so glad during WWII our troops always acted with the utmost respect the handling their fallen enemies. /sarc.

Sec Nav: Your fired.

83 posted on 11/24/2019 7:34:50 PM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

POSing with a POS cOrPSe

Oh the horror.


84 posted on 11/24/2019 8:23:42 PM PST by A_Former_Democrat (Guns up . . . We cominÂ’ PS: Eric The Blower Ciaramella. PASS IT ON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

[Spencer was on the record Friday opening defying the President. He is not the good guy here.

That is an auto fail move right there. You don’t have to like the order, you don’t get to challenge it in the media.]


Spencer and Esper were both talking out of both sides of their mouths. I think Trump decided he wasn’t gonna fire them both, and chose Spencer because he felt Esper was more useful. Spencer’s resignation letter suggests that he wasn’t just parroting Esper’s line. I’m really amazed that it has come to this. When the My Lai verdict was handed out:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Calley
[Many in the United States were outraged by what they perceived to be an overly harsh sentence for Calley. Georgia’s Governor, Jimmy Carter, future President of the United States, instituted American Fighting Man’s Day, and asked Georgians to drive for a week with their lights on.[23] Indiana’s Governor Edgar Whitcomb asked that all state flags be flown at half-staff for Calley, and the governors of Utah and Mississippi also publicly disagreed with the verdict.[23] The legislatures of Arkansas, Kansas, Texas, New Jersey, and South Carolina requested clemency for Calley.[23] Alabama’s governor, George Wallace, visited Calley in the stockade and requested that President Richard Nixon pardon him. After the conviction, the White House received over 5,000 telegrams; the ratio was 100 to 1 in favor of leniency.[24] In a telephone survey of the U.S. public, 79 percent disagreed with the verdict, 81 percent believed that the life sentence Calley had received was too stern, and 69 percent believed Calley had been made a scapegoat.[24]]


85 posted on 11/24/2019 9:23:40 PM PST by Zhang Fei (My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Never jump the chain of command.

I work as a regional supervisor. Every now and then someone will bypass me and my supervisor and go directly to the top guy. It creates all kinds of trouble. They can tell the top guy all kinds of stories that I know are not true, and he believes it because he is not here.

I finally got permission to send a gentle note to the top guy to ask him not to allow these bypassers.


86 posted on 11/24/2019 9:41:46 PM PST by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lurk

I agree never bypass the chain of command....always go to them first and each one up the chain. They are gate keepers for a reason.


87 posted on 11/24/2019 9:49:22 PM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

Should've just FIRED that Obama appointed guy! Wasn't Spencer appointed by TRUMP? Now there will be tons of media BS that I am sick of hearing!
88 posted on 11/24/2019 10:34:18 PM PST by KavMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Confusing.

Q: What’s the default position on this one here on FR again?

What is it we are supposed to think or say?


89 posted on 11/24/2019 11:22:41 PM PST by AmericanInTokyo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

May the “Curse of Trump” haunt your a$$ forever Navy Secretary Richard V. Spencer.


90 posted on 11/24/2019 11:39:52 PM PST by VideoDoctor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

“no idea where esper stands but this is not Trump firing the guy. It’s Esper”

Nothing in the military at this level happens without the knowledge AND approval of the President.


91 posted on 11/25/2019 1:24:09 AM PST by billyboy15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

If you were in the military or a student of military rules and procedures you would be aware of the importance of adherence to the chain of command.

The SECNAVY jumped the chain and his boss had no choice but to fire him.

However there is no chance this was not done without the knowledge and approval of POTUS.


92 posted on 11/25/2019 1:30:27 AM PST by billyboy15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: grwcfl537

You do not TELL your superior you are going over his head, you instead request permission to do so. In any and all cases this request will be granted. To not do so is itself a violation of protocol by the superior officer.


93 posted on 11/25/2019 1:36:00 AM PST by billyboy15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Good - the MSM falsely stated he was threatening to quit and he came out and said those stories weren’t true...I think he realized he stepped in it via the ultimate insubordination and was hoping to keep the job he proved unfit for.
I remember when politics so polluted the officer and senior NCO ranks that a Sec AF did quit in disgust - at one time it was normal to stand up for your folks and protect them (I stood in front of a few commanders pleading to let me handle issues with my troops) and then it became political suicide to not slam the troops whose shoulders the brass walked to their positions on.


94 posted on 11/25/2019 3:40:53 AM PST by trebb (Don't howl about illegal leeches, or Trump in general, while not donating to FR - it's hypocritical.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

I agree.


95 posted on 11/25/2019 4:43:59 AM PST by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: redgolum
"Now all the perfumed princes are going to be gunning for trump."

They already are gunning for Trump, along with most of the DC establishment.

96 posted on 11/25/2019 5:08:02 AM PST by Widget Jr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: DrDude
"Seems like Sec. Spencer choose this hill to die on. Why was this so important, in the general scheme of things?"

I haven't followed this as closely as I would have liked, but it almost seems to me like a classic desk jockey bureaucratic resentment directed towards the guys who do actual warfighting, the Former Secretary's military service notwithstanding. I so wholeheartedly object to the Former Secretary of The Navy's behavior in this that I believe, regardless of what he may have done or might have been in the past, he completely shat himself in this business. When you serve as a leader in a government position in the military chain at the pleasure of the President, if his orders are not immoral or evil, you do his bidding...if not, you resign. Full stop. That this guy did what he did fills me with distaste for him.

97 posted on 11/25/2019 5:30:52 AM PST by rlmorel (Finding middle ground with tyranny or evil makes you either a tyrant or evil. Often both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

Your use of Navy Chief is incorrect language. What you mean is Secretary of the Navy.

I am pretty sure that Gallagher is in fact the Navy Chief, Chief Petty Officer


98 posted on 11/25/2019 5:36:37 AM PST by bert ( (KE. NP. N.C. +12) Progressives are existential American enemies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: usafa92
These ppl need to be reminded that the military is run by our elected civilian leaders,

Wasn't that the biggest problem we had in Vietnam?

99 posted on 11/25/2019 5:47:04 AM PST by Hot Tabasco (Never take a centipede shopping for shoes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco

Well no.

McNamara was a civilian who tried to run a war using the statistical evaluation of numbers. Systems analysis became the trendy guiding principle. Young systems analysts became heros


100 posted on 11/25/2019 5:51:30 AM PST by bert ( (KE. NP. N.C. +12) Progressives are existential American enemies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-113 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson