Poor Chris, he is trying so hard to be relevant.
Wallace should actually watch the whole thing sometime.. It gets interesting once the other side gets to tell their story.
I’ve been on a few juries. The opening statements are very convincing for both sides. Eventually only one side is true.
Only in Wallace World.
This was like days 1 and 2, a disaster for Shifty Schiff.
Wallace is a rat hack but Sondland did just that. I heard the rats just withdrew the boycott that had organized on Sondland wife’s business.
As I am monitoring every now and then the cross examination it looks to me that Chrissy and other liberal scum have had a case of premature ejaculation as things are not as they originally reported. The optics were a flash in the pan.
Chris, your slip is showing.
Seems Chris is the one with the tread marks on his face.
Do I have to say it again? Okay. Here goes. Wallace you look and act like a weasel. Thank you.
Another reminder that FOX IS NOT OUR FRIEND Go to One America News for real news. OAN is what Fox used to pretend to be when it pretended to care about the truth.
Nancy Pelosi on Smear Tactics (1:13 min.)
The article is fair and makes Chris look silly.
Media trying to conflate an ethical trade: visit, for an unethical one: aid.
Maybe Wallace should think about this a little. He has certainly lost credibility with me.
Wallace got his talking point and found no need to listen to anything else,
How early in the day did Wallace say this.
I saw Sondland slaughtered by GOP cross examination until the Dems were able to deflect to lesser points of real interest.
But...I could not watch the whole thing because it was making my blood boil.
I believe we all know where Chrissy’s nose is whenever he’s around Lachlan Murdoch.
I don’t know what he means by ‘took out the bus”.
The Headline did not match the testimony he made and Wallace did not even provide anything from his testimony to show how he “took out the bus” ( his words ).
But let’s for the sake of argument, grant that Sondland proved Wallace’s case ( which he did not ).
THIS IS THE WORST CASE SCENARIO FOR TRUMP.
The Democrat’s accusation is this — Trump used the condition that Ukraine investigate Joe Biden’s influence peddling by withholding promised US foreign aid as leverage.
Let’s say, worst case, that this accusation can be proven (it has not ). Why is this impeachable?
1) It is a known fact that Joe Biden threatened to withhold foreign aid to Ukraine if they did not fire the prosecutor investigating Burisma’s corruption.
2)It is a known fact that Joe Biden’s son sits on the board of Burisma and was receiving over $80,000 a month for a position he was not qualified for ( confirmed by Lt. Col. Vindeman himself ).
3) It is a known fact that Joe Biden OPENLY BOASTED (we have the video) that he had the prosecutor fired USING US foreign aid as leverage.
4) It is a known fact that the foreign aid was given AFTER the prosecutor was fired.
WHY SHOULD TRUMP, WHO IS SUPPOSED TO BE CONCERNED WITH UKRAINE’s CORRUPTION AS THE CHIEF ENFORCER OF OUR LAWS NOT WANT TO HAVE THIS INVESTIGATED?
Unlike Mueller’s probe, this isn’t even a fishing expedition. The evidence is already there ( heck I haven’t even mentioned China yet ).
So, even if Trump used this as a quid pro quo to withhold foreign aid ( which he did not ), he is well within his authority to do so.
The fact that an investigation would benefit him since Biden is a political opponent is incidental. The more important point is THERE IS EVIDENCE OF CORRUPTION and it must be investigated.
There is nothing impeachable here. If any, Joe Biden should be disqualified from running until this whole thing is cleared up.
Well I see the “lisper” is trying to stay in the good graces of the left.......ain’t working with those with a brain....
Is THIS the End of Trump?