Posted on 11/14/2019 8:39:05 AM PST by Hojczyk
I think it can fairly be said that the public phase of Adam Schiffs impeachment inquiry didnt quite go as Democrats had hoped. Aside from being a snoozefest of epic proportions, bereft of dramatic outbursts and smoking guns, it also made very clearat least to those willing to sit through itthat the case against the President relies almost exclusively on the opinions of career bureaucrats about conversations to which they werent even a party, rather than on any kind of hard evidence. If anything summed up the disaster that
Democrats are slowly beginning to realize they face, its Illinois Representative Mike Quigleys hilarious spin, [C]ountless people have been convicted on hearsay. Hearsay can be much better evidence than direct.
Now consider that Ukraine has been a major focus of Attorney General Bill Barrs investigation into the origins of the Trump-Russia collusion hoax. Also consider that Barr and U.S. Attorney John Durham have spent a lot of time in Kiev interviewing Ukrainian officials as part of that investigation. And now, finally consider that the Department of Justice has recently shifted that investigation over to a criminal probe.
Seen in this light, the rush to impeachment can only be viewed as a panic move on their part. By attempting to cast Donald Trump as the corrupt actor in the Ukraine saga, theyre truing to divert attention from themselvesand then set up the spin, when the results of the Barr-Durham probe become public, that Trump is trying to cover up his own corruption by going after Biden, Kerry and other Obama administration figures. Its a tried and true Democrat tactic: accuse the other side of doing what they themselves are guilty of, with the mainstream media acting as crisis management.
Batten down the hatches, because its gonna get ugly.
(Excerpt) Read more at noqreport.com ...
“Seen in this light, the rush to impeachment can only be viewed as a panic move on their part. By attempting to cast Donald Trump as the corrupt actor in the Ukraine saga, theyre truing to divert attention from themselvesand then set up the spin, when the results of the Barr-Durham probe become public, that Trump is trying to cover up his own corruption by going after Biden, Kerry and other Obama administration figures. Its a tried and true Democrat tactic: accuse the other side of doing what they themselves are guilty of, with the mainstream media acting as crisis management.”
THAT is exactly what is going on.
The article says Barr and Durham have spent a lot of time in Kiev interviewing Ukranians.
It does indeed.
Also consider that Barr and U.S. Attorney John Durham have spent a lot of time in Kiev interviewing Ukrainian officials as part of that investigation.
That's made up BS.
Again, show me, don't tell me. Prove it to be wrong reporting.
That's not how it works.
They made a claim and offer no evidence, and no other news organization that I can find even mentions Barr or Durham going to Ukraine.
As I said in my original post, it's possible that they have a huge scoop but I think that's about as possible as proving a negative, which you asked me to do.
For sure. Typical bureaucrats that look down the people they are supposed to work for and do the best for.
Since the MSM hasn't reported on it (cough, cough...Amy Robach...cough, cough) you call it BS.
Got ya.
Maybe it should be called "The Eric Ciaramella Effect" (TECE).
Everybody knows about it but nobody wants to talk about it.
I'll remain skeptical and yet keep an open mind at the same time.
Perhaps I'll "read between the lines" a little closer.
Maybe use some of that deductive reasoning human beings are endowed with.
Either way, it'll all be fleshed out in time.
I said no other news organization, not just the MSM.
I couldn't find anything on Breitbart, Washington Examiner, Federalist, Gateway Pundit, Fox, or OAN.
Surely you aren't so simplistic to claim that anything other than NOQ Report is MSM.
Or are you?
What was your first clue, Einstein?
GOP Senators Ask DOJ About Ukrainian Documents Reportedly Contradicting Biden
Much like parents, We The People are usually the last ones to know some things.
And one more reading between the lines consideration...
US Attorney John Durham looking into Ukrainian involvement in 2016 election
A Department of Justice team led by U.S. Attorney John Durham is separately exploring the extent to which a number of countries, including Ukraine, played a role in the counterintelligence investigation directed at the Trump campaign during the 2016 election, DOJ spokeswoman Kerri Kupec said Wednesday.
Would "the team" be synonymous with Dunham himself?
Could they go and would it still be considered as Dunham himself going?
...not Dunham.
Maybe by the idiots at NOQ Report.
And you, apparently.
#33 why has no one asked Obama if he knew or authorized it?
No reporter has asked obama about Benghazi in 7 years.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.