Posted on 11/14/2019 7:46:46 AM PST by BlackFemaleArmyColonel
Tomorrow. The former Obama ambassador for Ukraine that Trump removed. Last names starts with Y.
You could say that Congressional opposition to the impeachment inquiry is BIPARTISAN, while the inquiry itself is wholly partisan.
That would be correct, factually.
Of course, not one mainstream news media org reported THAT.
What would they have said if two or more Republicans voted FOR it?
Because she, heard it from a friend, that heard it from a friend, who heard It from another that Trump's been messin' a---round.....
They have DINOs like we have RINOs. Not sure why you are surprised.
>>>I have a question. Even if the above statement is true, how is it Illegal?<<<
“Evidently, American citizens are allowed to go overseas and commit crimes with impunity”.
Sorry, I don’t get what your Post means. Are you talking about Shotgun Joe and his Son or POTUS Trump?
I hope that more Democrats see the light.
It’s difficult to observe any light when one’s head is firmly planted up one’s asp.
Anti-Trumper Paul Ryan was the worst - the pre Trump GOP was idiotically inept.
“Where’s the upside to all this to those vulnerable Democrats? They don’t see it.”
That’s why there’s all the avoidance to hold an impeachment proceedings vote. The Lawfare crew came up with this “inquiry” BS and tried to use it to obtain subpoenas.
The Court should not give them that allowance. This could go on for months with no actual vote on impeachment proceedings which may be the Rat fallback position.
CBS news radio just reported at high noon there is a second staffer that supposedly overheard the call. This is total BS.
What I thought of when I heard the testimony live yesterday was, wait, so Sondland called Trump from his cell phone in a coffee shop or I think Taylor said a restaurant, and one of Taylor’s staff could hear President Trump during the call. Two thoughts, 1. Sondland calls POTUS from his cell phone and bam, he’s on the phone with him just like that? 2. Did Sondland put POTUS on speaker, while Sondland and Taylor’s aide were at a restaurant/coffee shop?
All quite fishy, imo.
I think there was some speculation that President Trump is still being wiretapped.
Scenario #1) “I know what the President said on the phone because I wiretapped him.” — this doesn’t sound good (it’s illegal).
Scenario #2 “I know what the President said on the phone because … uhhhhhh … I was in the coffee shop and … uhhhhh … Sondlund called the President and … ahhhhh … put him on speaker and … uhhhhhh … I heard every word. Yeah. That’s it. That’s how it happened.”
I don't believe that. The Democrats have been the visibly anti-American party at least as long as I have been politically aware, and that was sin the '60s. Anyone who doesn't see that is either a)stupid, b)evil, or c0 a damn fool.
Holy shit this guy ought to be a RINO, at least we’d get one more vote for caucusing...
Touché
If you look it up in Fisch’s NY Evidence, the definition fits Taylor’s testimony like a glove, and doesn’t differ substantially from any 13th Century English case that discusses the term. It’s inadmissible in a court of law, and of questionable credibility in any context. So what.
Thank you for the info!
No it isn't! You just dealt with it!
“It’s hearsay,” Van Drew said after Wednesday’s impeachment inquiry hearing. “It’s really difficult dealing with this because it’s he said-she said.”
Where is the difficulty?!
Does the difficulty come from being told to toe the Party impeachment line
when you know it's plainly BS and doing so could cost you your office if you do?
Ewwwwww...somebody had their snake swallow their head?
/just kidding with you on a funny typo
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.