The very definition, in fact, since they are 1) unidentified, 2) flying, and 3) an object of some kind
As to anything else, who can say?
Posted on 11/04/2019 7:00:28 AM PST by RoosterRedux
In what could be a precursor to further stunning developments, the U.S. Navy has publicly acknowledged that the advanced aircraft depicted in several recently declassified gun-camera videos are UFOs, or what the Navy prefers to call “Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon” (UAPs). “The Navy designates the objects contained in these videos as unidentified aerial phenomena,” acknowledged Joseph Gradisher, spokesman for the deputy chief of naval operations, referring to the bizarre vehicles that have brazenly operated in restricted U.S. military airspace.
Strangely, this shocking announcement seems to have scarcely been noticed by Congress or the Trump administration. Is the information too jarring and radical to process? Are U.S. government officials in denial? One can only wonder, given the glaring disconnect between the Navy’s announcement and the limited government actions to protect U.S. military personnel and the nation as a whole.
The vehicles observed and recorded by U.S. Navy fighter pilots seem impervious to altitude or the elements; they are able to maneuver above 80,000 feet; they can hover and then instantly accelerate to supersonic and even hypersonic speeds; they have very low radar cross-sections and use a means of propulsion and control that does not appear to involve combustion, exhaust, rotors, wings or flaps.
Since the Navy asserts these are not U.S. aircraft, we are confronted by the daunting prospect that a potential adversary of the United States has achieved the ability to render our most sophisticated aircraft and air defense systems obsolete...
*snip*
I’ve interviewed numerous active-duty and retired military personnel who have encountered these mysterious vehicles. Without exception they express grave concern for their colleagues and near disbelief that our government is not reacting more vigorously.
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
If UFO’s could be blamed on Trump in a damaging way, we would be hearing about them from every nook and cranny in the Capitol and DC.
When the B2 was being developed People were always calling in UFO sightings around the desert and Tehachapi area.
They are US expiremental aircraft. They now have a cover story to explain their presence when not expected. If this were tech that our military didn’t know about shit would be hitting the fan right now and we would know something really threatens us.
The Feds aren’t making much of it because those ‘UFO’s aren’t alien - they’re ours. Why else would they be allowed to operate within military airspace without being fired upon?
Allot of military guys ( especially radar guys) saw all kinds of unexplained stuff and their info was taken by the men in black coats.
How do you know they weren't?
That "Need to Know" doesn't include us peons.
*ping*
Perhaps extra planetary, could also be extra dimensional (parallel dimensions, or timelines), extra temporal (deep past or deep future), spiritual (Good, bad, neutral)
Reports are that we lost a lot of pilots and planes when the rules of engagement were to shoot first.
Don't start nothin' there won't be nothin'...
So why are they so often seen in populated areas instead of where they wouldn’t be observed?
And why has there never been a leaked photo or even a sketch or even a drunken call to George Noory by someone who’s worked on these secret projects? People love to tell secrets...
Probably true, but it's also true that they aren't here to be our enemies either.
If they were, given the level of raw power they control, we wouldn't be here!
UFOs = Test Planes
Quix would have loved this thread.
Congress is full of UFOs.
> the U.S. Navy has publicly acknowledged that the advanced aircraft depicted in several recently declassified gun-camera videos are UFOs, or what the Navy prefers to call “Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon” (UAPs) <
That sentence contradicts itself. The Navy has NOT acknowledged UFOs. They have acknowledged UAPs. Is there a difference? You bet.
A UFO is generally thought of as something from another planet. It’s an alien ship. A UAP is simply something that the Navy cannot - or will not - identify. A UAP could be some kid’s toy drone that wandering into government airspace.
“So why aren’t they on Washington’s radar?”
Because the seditious scum traitors haven’t figured out how to cash in on it yet. Maybe a UFO tax will keep them away...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.