Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/23/2019 3:39:23 AM PDT by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: knighthawk

More criminal leftists in black robes.

JoMa


2 posted on 10/23/2019 3:46:30 AM PDT by joma89
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

Good old unconstitutional obamacare


4 posted on 10/23/2019 3:47:22 AM PDT by 2banana (My common ground with islamic terrorists - they want to die for allah and we want to kill them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

Well, there are THREE nominees for the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals that are pending before Lindsey Graham’s Senate Judiciary Committee.

Maybe Lindsey could get more focused on processing Trump’s Judicial nominees and spend a little less time running toward every camera and microphone he sees. And maybe he could get rid of the Blue Slip process for Federal District Court nominees while he’s at it.


5 posted on 10/23/2019 3:49:19 AM PDT by House Atreides (Boycott the NFL 100% — PERMANENTLY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

go to en banc and then wait it out for notorious rbg to croak


6 posted on 10/23/2019 3:50:41 AM PDT by SteveH (intentionally blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

I specifically remember Obama allowing exemptions for Congress because Obamacare gave the executive branch carte blanche on exemptions...

Am I remembering this incorrectly??


8 posted on 10/23/2019 4:17:23 AM PDT by reed13k (For evil to triumph it is only necessary that good men do nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

On to the SCOTUS.


10 posted on 10/23/2019 5:45:55 AM PDT by Wizdum (The Dems are not afraid a wall won't work, the Dems are TERRIFIED a wall WILL work.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

Hasn’t the USSC already ruled on this?


12 posted on 10/23/2019 5:49:13 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

But it was not a mandate by the legislation itself. It was a rule by Obama’s HHS. This is ignorance writ large on the part of the court. If one administration can enact a rule based on its understanding of how a law is to be put into practice another administration can do the same. Especially if the change is more in line with current laws- such as the RFPA act.


17 posted on 10/23/2019 7:04:35 AM PDT by lastchance (Credo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

8 out of 10 rulings by the Ninth Circuit Court get overturned most of the time,they studied law between lunch and dinner.


18 posted on 10/23/2019 8:17:28 AM PDT by Vaduz (women and children to be impacIQ of chimpsted the most.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson