Posted on 10/08/2019 11:15:02 PM PDT by knighthawk
John Kerry's comments on foreign leaders during 2004 election season resurface amid Trump-Ukraine controversy
After former President Bill Clinton’s request for help from a foreign official resurfaced Monday, now it's John Kerry’s turn in the spotlight.
On Tuesday’s edition of “Tucker Carlson Tonight,” the host flashed back to a 2004 comment from Kerry, then a candidate for president, claiming foreign leaders told him how much they wanted him to oust then-President George W. Bush.
“John Kerry has been talking to anyone who will listen about the president’s shocking behavior with Ukraine,” Carlson said on his show Tuesday night, before turning his attention to the former secretary of state.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Kerry also met with some foreign arms dealer during the DNC convention that year, some guy from the Balkans, I think. He was also playing footsie with the head of Sein Fein...
It’s often amusing....all this fantastic effort by literally hundreds of Democrats...talking to dozens of country leaders or pretender-leaders. Why not use some of that time and effort here in the US? Or did the theme and message simply not resonate with the general public?
If you have a half-baked political message that Americans mostly won’t buy into....going off to foreign lands to whine and talk over your woes make you look like some weak political figure....like a drunk Irishman at a pub.
" (Libertad Digital) The president of the government, - then, on 3/11, Socialist candidate- and the director of EL MUNDO kept a telephone conversation – the third that day – at 10:00 PM on the day of the attacks in Madrid. José Luis Rodríguez-Zapatero maintained before Pedro J. Ramírez that there were suicide terrorists on the trains and that this information came from “inside”. “Look, we have ruled for 13 years and we have people inside”, emphasized the then Socialist candidate, probably trying to grant more credibility to his words, according to the context of the dialogue reconstructed by the director of EL MUNDO. Zapatero also boasted before Ramírez of having sources in the White House by intercession of the Democrat candidate John Kerry. “They have moles in the White House”, he plotted. From one of those alleged “moles” came, according to the confidences of Zapatero to Ramírez, the White House’s certainty, reached that same afternoon of 3/11, that Al Qaeda had perpetrated the attacks. "--http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1821681/posts
To: AZLiberty In summary, the Socialist Zapatero got himself elected in a close election by claiming that the conservative incumbent was lying when he said that ETA (the Basque terrorist organization) was responsible for the train bombings. Instead, he said it was Muslim terrorists, the ETA had nothing to do with it, and he was responsible for getting Spain bombed because he was helping the US in Iraq. Zapatero was elected on this claim that his opponent had lied about the terrorists. But, it turns out, he himself was lying, and has been covering up ever since. The ETA WAS responsible for the bombing. Possibly Muslim terrorists were involved as well, but in any case the ETA was certainly involved. This was important to us because the Socialists (virtually Communists, with a violent history) took over Spain and pulled out of the GWOT. Spain went over to the Dark Side. 5 posted on 4/22/2007, 5:26:58 PM by Cicero (Marcus Tullius) [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 |
Let’s keep in mind John Kerry met with the N Viets during the war, while he was still in the army, our actual wartime enemy. He was publicly calling for our defeat so he certainly encouraged the enemy in those talks. To this day I believe he will not reveal what he said in that meeting.
So talk about collusion with foreigners! He was an out and out traitor.
I am pretty sure the latest oil tanker and attacks on Saudis by the Iranians were the works of that scumbag Kerry, asking the Iranians to trap Trump in a difficult situation there, making him make mistakes and take risks with our troops.
The word ‘traitor’ gets thrown around a lot in our politically charged climate, but in Kerry’s case it’s dictionary accurate.
Kerry, a corrupt, lying, traitorous bastard? Oh no, tell me it isn’t so.
That John Kerry - NEVER MIND!
We sank his traitorous ass back in 2004. Done by a great band of brothers and other Vietnam vets/researchers - “Unfit for Command”.
What has that traitor been up to?
Three months in Nam.
Three Purple Hearts...
What’s a Drudge?
Don’t forget Ted Kennedy’s attempt to get the Russians involved in our elections back in 1983 in an attempt to hurt Reagan’s reelection chances.
In 2016 the DNC, Clinton campaign and 0bama administration were all lining up in Ukraine and Russia to dig dirt on Trump and Manafort.
Then there are the dems who want to flood the country with illegal aliens to help sway elections to the dems. That’s also foreign interference.
One of the few good things GWB ever did was stopping this anti- American 60’s communist.
What’s a Drudge?There is no Drudge. Drudge sold the website to GOOGLE...
Drudge is now a(nother) GOOGLE propaganda machine...Nuff said?
Yep.
Kerry’s campaign and Clinton-installed CIA agents were coordinating with elements of the intelligence community in Britain, Italy, Germany, France, Syria, and Iran (among others), including some of the same people involved in the current efforts against Trump.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.