“Schiff personally never knew the whistleblower’s identity. That’s hardly ‘orchestrating’ the complaint,” he added. The denial here is Schiff never personally knew the identity of the whistleblower.
If Schiff didn't personally meet with the whistleblower did he communicate via phone, email, text, etc? Did they communicate incognito?
To: yesthatjallen
Who changed the rules to permit “hearsay”?
2 posted on
10/02/2019 6:42:10 PM PDT by
a fool in paradise
(Denounce DUAC - The Democrats Un-American Activists Committee)
To: yesthatjallen
NYT.....fact check.....snort...guffaw..
L
3 posted on
10/02/2019 6:43:26 PM PDT by
Lurker
(Peaceful coexistence with the Left is not possible. Stop pretending that it is.)
To: yesthatjallen
Isn’t it amazing how the media will rush to defend a Democrat, “without evidence” for any of their shady dealings
4 posted on
10/02/2019 6:44:56 PM PDT by
digger48
To: yesthatjallen
“Schiff personally never knew the whistleblower’s identity. That’s hardly ‘orchestrating’ the complaint,” he added.If he didn't know the identity, or didn't orchestrate this, how was he able to fill in the gaps for his infamous "parody"? Did he just pull it out of his ass?
6 posted on
10/02/2019 6:48:36 PM PDT by
fhayek
To: yesthatjallen
Whenever I hear or see the word "factcheck" these days, I just totally ignore what follows.
Works great.
8 posted on
10/02/2019 7:05:58 PM PDT by
kiryandil
(The Media & the DNC tells you who you're gonna vote for. We CHOSE Trump.)
To: yesthatjallen
Chain of Command...plain and simple. They violated it by going outside whatever agency they work for. Severe enough of a violation that deserves serious discipline.
9 posted on
10/02/2019 7:08:02 PM PDT by
mass55th
("Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway." ~~ John Wayne)
To: yesthatjallen
The whole thing stinks. I can’t believe the Repubs are nit hollering now!!!!
11 posted on
10/02/2019 7:13:54 PM PDT by
BunnySlippers
(I Love BULL MARKETS!)
To: yesthatjallen
No one believes this. Schiff Knew. No doubt about it
To: yesthatjallen
“The whistleblower went to an intel committee staffer with a vague account of the complaint,”
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
IOW, he first went to Congress with the complaint. Does that remove his whistleblower protection?
13 posted on
10/02/2019 7:21:22 PM PDT by
Ken H
(2019 => The House of Representin')
To: yesthatjallen
14 posted on
10/02/2019 7:26:17 PM PDT by
rolling_stone
(no justice no peace and leakers)
To: yesthatjallen
Maybe I’m just getting to be a mean old man.
I think the NY Times is lying.
17 posted on
10/02/2019 7:54:18 PM PDT by
TigersEye
(This is the age of the death of reason.)
To: yesthatjallen
NYT is getting their information from Shifty.
19 posted on
10/02/2019 8:02:46 PM PDT by
OrioleFan
(Republicans believe every day is July 4th, Democrats believe every day is April 15th.)
To: yesthatjallen
Schiff4Brains said “we” many times. We, like royal we, or all wee-weed up?
21 posted on
10/02/2019 8:06:22 PM PDT by
SERKIT
("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.......)
To: yesthatjallen
I am not going to the NYT and read what the reporter wrote but from what I read here it doesn’t sound like rigorous fact checking.
Talking to staffers is not much in the way of fact checking.
Did he get to review meeting notes or desk calendars?
Did he get to review phone logs?
Taking staffers at their word as to what really happen doesn’t add up to fact checking in my book.
26 posted on
10/02/2019 8:32:52 PM PDT by
Pontiac
(The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit)
To: yesthatjallen; Lurker
History rhymes.
37 posted on
10/03/2019 4:15:31 AM PDT by
Travis McGee
(EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson