Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How College-Educated Whites Are Polarizing And Fracturing The Democratic Party, Pushing it Leftward
The Federalist ^ | 10/01/2019 | Warren Henry

Posted on 10/01/2019 8:16:39 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

Elizabeth Warren’s rise in the polls (and Joe Biden’s stumbles) will start obscuring what the first eight months of the presidential primary campaign revealed to many: the Democratic Party is fractured along lines of ideology, identity, and age (if age is not a subset of identity). A new survey suggests college-educated whites are driving fissures into the Democratic rank-and-file.

Even before the presidential cycle started in earnest, it was becoming apparent that Democrats have an “upstairs / downstairs” coalition, in which a relatively small elite drive policy in ways that do not always serve the interests of the party’s traditional working-class base.

The large-scale “Hidden Tribes“ survey conducted by the left-leaning More in Common group suggested “progressive activists”—the furthest-left 8 percent of Americans—were more white than all but the most conservative 6 percent of Americans. A follow-up study showed progressive activists have among the most distorted views of their political rivals.

Moreover, “Democrats’ understanding of Republicans actually gets worse with every additional degree they earn. This effect is so strong that Democrats without a high school diploma are three times more accurate than those with a postgraduate degree.”

White progressives have similar, if lesser, problems with their fellow Democrats. In the wake of the “Great Awokening,” white liberals have moved to the left of the black Democrats on some racial issues. The schism extends to other issues, including Israel, immigration, and gender identity.

These previous studies and polls left open the question of how big the divergence was between the median Democrat and the party’s far-left, disproportionately white elites. Echelon Insights, a political research and intelligence firm, recently conducted a survey matched against voter files that begins to lift the curtain further on whether and how the “Great Awokening” has affected Democrats overall.

Echelon created a “social and cultural values index,” based on Democratic and Republican responses to eight questions regarding immigration, marijuana legalization, the death penalty, abortion, reparations for slavery, and LGBTQ issues. By this measure, college-educated white Democrats (at -50.9) are further to the left than “Trump Republicans” are to the right (at 48.9).

They are further to the left than Democratic primary voters (at -37.1) and donors (at 44.4). And college-educated white Democrats are more than twice as far to the left as black (-24.6) or Latino (-24.3) Democrats are. Minority Democrats are much closer to the index score for non-college whites (-21).

The Echelon survey also reveals that Democrats are much less unified in their views on these social and cultural questions. For example, on the question of reparations, non-college white Dems largely oppose them (scoring 54 on the index), white college Dems less so (scoring 14), Latino Dems barely supporting them (at -2), and black Dems strongly supporting reparations (at -55). In contrast, Republicans overwhelmingly oppose reparations (all groups scoring in the 80s).

Various splits also arise on other issues in the index. White college and Latino Democrats oppose a ban on abortion after 20 weeks, while non-college whites and blacks mildly support one. White college Dems strongly oppose requiring transgender people to use bathrooms matching their birth sex, while black Dems mildly support it. And white college Dems are the only group opposed to the death penalty for murderers.

Echelon further asked Democrats how concerned they were about issues beyond those in the index, disclosing further splits between white college Dems and other demographics. President Trump’s policies are of extreme concern to 77 percent of white college Democrats, but only 58 percent of black Democrats. (There is a roughly similar split on “Trump’s offensive tweets.”) Climate change is of extreme concern to 71 percent of white college Democrats, while only 38 percent of black Democrats feel that way.

Conversely, 69 percent of black Democrats are extremely concerned about gun violence; a bit surprisingly, only 53 percent of college-educated whites agree. Seventy-three percent of black Dems are extremely concerned by police brutality, as opposed to 37 of college white Dems (and only 33 percent of white non-college Dems). Indeed, on the general topic of racism, 69 percent of black Dems are extremely concerned, while only 56 percent of white college Dems are (and a mere 40 percent of white non-college Dems).

Obviously, we should not read too much into the results of a single survey. But along with some prior polling, it appears that college-educated white Democrats as a group are much less woke than the party’s elites on racism and other issues of importance to black Democrats. This finding may support the theory that the “Great Awokening” among progressive elites is a phenomenon associated with (and perhaps driven by) Twitter and other forms of social media. But these results are in tension with prior polling regarding white liberals and bear further exploration.

More broadly, Echelon’s results suggest that college-educated white Democrats are the demographic most responsible for pushing the party leftward, particularly on social and cultural issues and “resisting” President Trump. They are an outlier within the Democratic Party, let alone the general electorate.

Given that the Democrats’ current electoral strategies are aimed more at college-educated whites than non-college whites, the party’s schisms are likely to continue in the medium-term.


Warren Henry is the nom de plume of an attorney practicing in the State of Illinois.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: college; democrats; education; leftism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: SeekAndFind

When they say “college educated” Democrats, that means a high proportion of social sciences and not engineers, scientists, business, accounting, etc.


21 posted on 10/01/2019 9:18:22 AM PDT by DaxtonBrown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus
If Warren is the nominee, how does she ensure high turnout by black voters?

Knowing Lizzie her rallies will be minstrel shows. Her median voting base is retired white female teachers previously dumped by their husbands

22 posted on 10/01/2019 9:21:23 AM PDT by Stentor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus

Warren cannot get high turnout by black voters—a black VP is _not_ going to get it done.

Blacks don’t trust her—and the optics of a black in an “inferior” position will just damage that trust even further.

It will be (correctly) seen as elite white pandering.


23 posted on 10/01/2019 9:57:32 AM PDT by cgbg (Vote Trump or you will _be_ Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mouton

“Cankles the wall street candidate no way runs with Warren as her running mate IMO. Cankles running is all in her head, the party has had enough from her.”

indeed. hillary’s already a two-time loser who pissed away two billion in losing to a neophyte reality show host ... Hillary as VP candidate would guarantee to drag down the ticket regardless of who was at the top ...


24 posted on 10/01/2019 10:25:16 AM PDT by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

bump


25 posted on 10/01/2019 11:16:00 AM PDT by Albion Wilde (It is fatal to enter any war without the will to win it. --Douglas MacArthur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

Lol!


26 posted on 10/01/2019 11:51:47 AM PDT by EvilCapitalist (It's Ok to be white.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: cgbg
Yes, they say that the VP nominee doesn't make much difference in the outcome.

2016 may have been different in that by picking Pence Trump helped himself with conservatives and evangelicals who were wary because of his earlier life. And picking LBJ may have made the difference in 1960--LBJ may not have made an effort to steal Texas for the ticket if he was not on it.

27 posted on 10/01/2019 12:07:11 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus

LBJ—lol:

https://www.amazon.com/Man-Who-Killed-Kennedy-Against/dp/1626363137


28 posted on 10/01/2019 1:11:32 PM PDT by cgbg (Vote Trump or you will _be_ Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: cgbg
Is Roger Stone trying to let the CIA off the hook?

I recall there was a Congressional investigation into the JFK assassination which (if I remember correctly) did not agree with the findings of the Warren Commission, but I don't remember if they did come up with their own theory of who was behind the assassination.

29 posted on 10/01/2019 1:58:08 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus

The CIA and the FBI play a prominent role in the book.

It is one of the best on the JFK assassination in my view—and I have read a _lot_ of them.

For info on that congressional investigation the best source is:

https://www.amazon.com/Last-Investigation-Gaeton-Fonzi/dp/151071393X

More detail on the CIA role can be found here:

https://www.amazon.com/Bond-Secrecy-Watergate-Conspirator-Howard/dp/1936296837/

In the last book E. Howard Hunt explains that he was in charge of CIA logistics for the JFK assassination. The Western Hemisphere division staff, agents, and contacts used standard operating procedure for the hit.

LBJ and J Edgar Hoover were in charge of the cover-up after the fact, with an assist from Operation Mockingbird agents in the mass media.


30 posted on 10/01/2019 2:14:07 PM PDT by cgbg (Vote Trump or you will _be_ Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson