Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ukraine fears forced concessions at talks with Russia
AP by Yahoo ^ | September 13, 2019

Posted on 09/15/2019 8:10:21 AM PDT by NorseViking

KYIV, Ukraine (AP) — The Ukrainian president's envoy for peace talks with Russia-backed separatists expressed concern Friday that the leaders of France and Germany will push Ukraine to make unacceptable concessions to Russia.

Ukraine and Russia have been locked in a bitter standoff since 2014, when Russia annexed the Crimean Peninsula and threw its weight behind separatists in eastern Ukraine. Hopes for a solution to the separatist conflict in eastern Ukraine, which has claimed more than 13,000 lives, were revived after political novice Volodymyr Zelenskiy was elected Ukrainian president in April.

But his envoy, Leonid Kuchma, told The Associated Press he is concerned that France and Germany, who are mediating the talks, will push President Zelenskiy to make trade-offs, such as approving a plan for the separatists to hold local elections in the areas they control without any oversight by the Ukrainian government.

(Excerpt) Read more at yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; Russia
KEYWORDS: ukraine
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last
To: NorseViking

Ukraine wants in NATO now. But they still have to meet reform standards.

Pres. Zalensky who won with 73% of vote, met with NATO in June.

In time, they will join NATO, like most of Russia’s former allies.

Poland, Czech, Hungary, etc...


21 posted on 09/15/2019 9:34:27 AM PDT by rbmillerjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr
In fact Ukraine wishes to be in NATO, because of Russia, lol.

Gobbledegook.

Most of the residents of Austrian Lemberg (Polish Lwow, Ukrainian L'viv) and its hinterlands (Galicia and Volhynia) identify with globohomo and want to be part of the West. The rest of the population are spiritually Russian.

The idea of a unitary Ukrainian state encompassing these two very different peoples - different in religion, different in philosophy of life, different in views of the West - is foolishness.

22 posted on 09/15/2019 9:34:43 AM PDT by Jim Noble (There is nothing racist in stating plainly what most people already know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr

Ukraine doesn’t qualify for NATO for a reason of ongoing territorial dispute, just like Georgia. Even if they would award DNR&LNR Confederacy de-jure autonomy and de-facto independence they still claim Crimea for their own. It is disqualifying factor especially in light of fact that NATO mostly wanted Crimea to start with.


23 posted on 09/15/2019 9:44:41 AM PDT by NorseViking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

Also Hungarians and Romanians in the Southwest.


24 posted on 09/15/2019 9:53:16 AM PDT by NorseViking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: NorseViking

Does this mean you think the Hungarians are wrong to vividly remember the Muslim threat and massacres of the 16th century?


25 posted on 09/15/2019 9:54:59 AM PDT by ColoCdn (Neco eos omnes, Deus suos agnoset)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ColoCdn

Non-sequitur. Currently they face the suppression of their culture by the Ukrainian government as well.


26 posted on 09/15/2019 10:01:43 AM PDT by NorseViking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Reily

“argument for Russia reabsorbing Ukraine”

We hear these type of totalitarian arguments all the time. La Raza wants to reabsorb the US southwest and Al Qaeda wants to reabsorb Spain.

The company you keep...


27 posted on 09/15/2019 10:06:10 AM PDT by romanesq (8Chan and its child porn, violence and murders are kaput. So is the QAnon grift with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NorseViking

Poor response. Hungary’s response to muslim migration as promoted by EU globalists is definitely rooted n their memories of the past. Are you some quasi Russian troll from Tallinn or something?


28 posted on 09/15/2019 10:07:04 AM PDT by ColoCdn (Neco eos omnes, Deus suos agnoset)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ColoCdn

The response fit the Non-sequitur question. There are no parallels between these situations.


29 posted on 09/15/2019 10:12:57 AM PDT by NorseViking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: romanesq

You guys are making a strawman. Once again I am all for an independent Ukraine. The argument was about Ukrainian nuclear status which is a pure insanity.


30 posted on 09/15/2019 10:15:59 AM PDT by NorseViking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: NorseViking

Now you’re backtracking. In post #13, you argued that Ukrainians didn’t hate the Russians, and that any such suggestion was a dated opinion. You even provided anecdotal evidence. My suggestion that you read a recent book was posted to indicate that there was evidence to the contrary. And now you’re for Ukrainian independence? Choose a side, mate!


31 posted on 09/15/2019 10:33:20 AM PDT by ColoCdn (Neco eos omnes, Deus suos agnoset)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: romanesq
We hear these type of totalitarian arguments all the time. La Raza wants to reabsorb the US southwest and Al Qaeda wants to reabsorb Spain

Or, the US could absorb Sonora and Chihuahua, and Spain could repossess Morocco.

Is it your view that borders don't change?

They change all the time.

32 posted on 09/15/2019 10:41:26 AM PDT by Jim Noble (There is nothing racist in stating plainly what most people already know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: NorseViking

I see a possible precedent here. Its a take over border issue. Khrushchev gave the parcel to Ukraine for saving Russia’s ass in WWII. Now they want it back? The German borders were moved back westward stopping at the Oder river. How long before they’ll want their eastern territory that is now Poland?


33 posted on 09/15/2019 10:45:36 AM PDT by Bringbackthedraft
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColoCdn

Now you mixed three things into one instead of earlier two and tries to make argument out of it.
That’s illogical.

Issue #1 Ukrainian independence.

Issue #2 Ukrainian nuclear status.

Issue #3 Ukrainian hatred of Russians.

Is it correct? I guess it is.

Now tell me what makes direct correlation between these issues?
Correct answer is nothing.

Ukraine might be independent without nukes and hatred or Russians.

Or it might be dependent with nukes and hatred of Russians.

And the whole lot of other combinations possible based on simple algebraic principles.

Don’t fool yourself and everybody else.


34 posted on 09/15/2019 10:53:52 AM PDT by NorseViking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Bringbackthedraft

Khruschev didn’t gave parcel over WWII. Khruschev gave Crimea because the bridge between Crimea and mainland Russia was destroyed in 1944 and there was no connection. It was easier to administer from Ukraine because it is a peninsula and has indeed land connection to Ukraine. It wasn’t a problem since Ukraine and Russia were both states of a single federation.

If you are to go deeper in history Ukraine in current form NEVER existed as a nation-state before 1992.
It didn’t exist ever in any form before 1920 and then only briefly. Any source claiming otherwise is a Bolshevik propaganda designed to ruin Russian Empire by inspiring any kind of secessionist movement and later its adaptations by Nazi Germans mainly for the same purpose but targeting USSR.

Once again all of the above don’t exclude the possibility of Ukrainian independence as a fact recent reality.


35 posted on 09/15/2019 11:05:16 AM PDT by NorseViking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: NorseViking

All we’re trying to find out, bucko, is where you stand on all this. The more you text, the more you obfuscate.


36 posted on 09/15/2019 11:06:24 AM PDT by ColoCdn (Neco eos omnes, Deus suos agnoset)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr
The Ukrainians hate the Russians

Outside of neo-fascist strong holds like Liviv, this is simply not true.

There are literally millions of Ukrainians living and working in Russia.

37 posted on 09/15/2019 11:10:10 AM PDT by mac_truck (aide toi et dieu t'aidera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ColoCdn

I made it very clear. I am for independent Ukraine, without nukes, and without hatred of Russians based on that three parameters you have set.
When I say independent I mean truly independent but not in a sense that it is independent of Russia but dependent from something else.


38 posted on 09/15/2019 11:11:40 AM PDT by NorseViking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

I agree the Senate never signed anything.
However see

Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budapest_Memorandum_on_Security_Assurances

If I was Ukraine I would think we had been “guaranteed”!


39 posted on 09/15/2019 11:15:20 AM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Reily

Probably so, unless you have background in international law. On the other hand Ukraine still exists and it means guarantees worked.


40 posted on 09/15/2019 11:18:22 AM PDT by NorseViking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson