Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Mystery of the Missing Husbands
freebeacon ^ | SEPTEMBER 10, 2019 | Charles Fain Lehman

Posted on 09/10/2019 12:31:06 PM PDT by RomanSoldier19

A startling number of young women are unable to find a spouse, and new research from a group of economists suggests their would-be partners are just not up to snuff.

(Excerpt) Read more at freebeacon.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: end; family; marriage; the; toxicfeminism; women
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360361-377 last
To: kearnyirish2

Intelligent, discerning men of good character will continue to marry because the benefits outweigh the risks. The unfair family courts are an outlying risk.

The real reason young people aren’t marrying is because they don’t know how. Marriage and family has been denigrated in popular culture since the 50’s.

No man in the 19th century would have referred to a wife as a ‘ball and chain’. It would have been considered vulgar and crass and a man with such an attitude would have been ostracized from polite society.

Feminism/Playboyism (and they are inextricably linked) tore down the pedestal women used to occupy in the name of free love/sex and now people don’t even know what gender they are.

Until men (as a group) rebuild that pedestal and put women back on it and eschew irresponsible sex and vulgar living the beatings will continue.


361 posted on 09/12/2019 8:33:39 AM PDT by Valpal1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 359 | View Replies]

To: Valpal1

Completely wrong. Until divorce is no longer a lob sided arrangement favoring women and until feminism dies down, marriage will continue to decline. Intelligent men are the ones opting out of marriage and only the ones that want kids at all cost, marriage risk be damned, are getting married. How old are you out of curiosity? You have no idea how much younger women have changed even in the last 15 years! Study after study shows after two partners women have a harder time bonding permanently and nearly every attractive college educated woman has had at least 30 partners by the time she gets married at 25, 30 years of age.


362 posted on 09/12/2019 9:29:57 PM PDT by rb22982
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 361 | View Replies]

To: rb22982

I have one millennial daughter (married 10 years) and 2 gen Z daughters (one just married, one still in college).

I question the validity of your statistic and source. Sounds like something from a MGTOW website.


363 posted on 09/12/2019 10:20:04 PM PDT by Valpal1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 362 | View Replies]

To: Valpal1
Which part do you not believe? That pair bonding is weaker after many partners or that today’s younger women are having an insane number of partners? The first there are plenty of studies out there showing it and the second you wouldn’t believe unless you were an alpha 20-45 year guy out on the market. Many of the women at my office have started talking to me now that I’m back on the market and one of them yesterday said “thank God my husband has no idea how much ‘fun’ I had from 18-25.” It won’t completely replicate it because in person game matters even more than online game but the closest you’ll be able to see how women act with hit alphas is to post an online profile with a bunch of pics of a hot 25-30 guy and learn some game. It will be a real eye opener. And the later hubby doesn’t know, I promise you her daddy doesn’t.

No, I am not a mgtow guy, just have taken the red pill.

364 posted on 09/13/2019 3:58:05 AM PDT by rb22982
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 363 | View Replies]

To: Valpal1

Sure, those men will marry - but they are a small subset of the population. Groups that supported marriage have been successfully marginalized or subverted by the left - with the Catholic Church first among them.


365 posted on 09/13/2019 4:16:48 AM PDT by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic warfare against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 361 | View Replies]

To: rb22982

Not the pair bonding, it’s true for men as well although the effect is somewhat stronger in females.

I question the validity of the “insane” number of partners. The studies are all over the map, but the ones with the highest numbers are mostly garbage online types which have zero controls and self selected participants.

And just like the divorce rate is driven by a small core of serial marriers, the partner average is driven up by a small subset of sexually hyperactive

20% of men are not getting 80% of the women. It’s more like 20% of women are doing 80% of the men.


366 posted on 09/13/2019 3:04:46 PM PDT by Valpal1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 364 | View Replies]

To: Valpal1
The studies will always be wrong, because women lie like crazy about their N count, if they even know it, once they get to 5. Unless you've never been a 22-40 year High SMV male in the single market, you just won't believe what these women will admit to their FWB guys. I have, and several of my buddies are cleaning up shop, and the church girls are usually the freakiest ones, even the married ones once they get that 7 year itch.

20% of men are not getting 80% of the women. It’s more like 20% of women are doing 80% of the men.LMAO This is seriously the craziest thing I've ever seen written on FR. You have no idea what you are talking about. I'll see if I can find the dating website survey from a few years ago where men rated women on the site a near perfect bell-curve for women while women rated the top 20% 8-10s and everyone else 1-4 with nothing in between. Again, if you want to even get a taste of what the top alpha guys get, setup a profile on all the dating sites (match, bumbl, plenty of fish, tinder, etc) of a super hot 25 year old guy, write something a**holish in your profile and just see what happens. And that's without ANY "game" which is 3/4 of the battle.

367 posted on 09/14/2019 4:58:04 AM PDT by rb22982
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 366 | View Replies]

To: rb22982

You realize that “Dating website surveys” are the worst form of social science data? It is no way representative of the population as a whole.

Not how science works.

Apparently you have immersed yourself in this virtual milieu and confused it with reality. Googles says that half of young adults use dating apps. Other research says 1/3 of that half use them for hook ups. In reality land, that is 16% of young adults behaving as you describe.

Technology has not changed basic human nature.


368 posted on 09/14/2019 1:58:58 PM PDT by Valpal1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 367 | View Replies]

To: Valpal1

You continue to ignore what I’ve said over and over again that in person game is more important than dating apps, but given you can’t turn your body into a 25 super hot male that has learned game, the closest you see would be the dating app with a fake profile. And the dating app bell curve, or lack thereof, plays out the same in real life. You can pretend women’s behaviors aren’t changing and I’ll keep watching the marriage rate continue to drop


369 posted on 09/15/2019 12:02:12 PM PDT by rb22982
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 368 | View Replies]

To: CardCarryingMember.VastRightWC

I like it, thanks.


370 posted on 09/15/2019 5:31:19 PM PDT by Herakles (Diversity is applied Marxism!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 312 | View Replies]

To: rb22982
"Women ... seem to just absolutely be obsessed with shopping"

Someone once said on the difference between sexes:

A man will pay $10 for a $5 item he needs.

A woman will pay $10 for a $20 item she doesn't need.

371 posted on 09/15/2019 7:19:22 PM PDT by CardCarryingMember.VastRightWC ("Blessed are the young, for they shall inherit the national debt" - Pr. Herbert Hoover)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 347 | View Replies]

To: Valpal1

So true. Great comments in your post #359.


372 posted on 09/15/2019 8:02:02 PM PDT by Cedar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 361 | View Replies]

To: Valpal1

Sorry, meant to say your post #361.


373 posted on 09/15/2019 8:03:22 PM PDT by Cedar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 372 | View Replies]

To: Cedar

Thank you. Very few want to hear it.


374 posted on 09/15/2019 8:48:56 PM PDT by Valpal1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 373 | View Replies]

To: Valpal1

Frantically rebuilding the mound, I see.

Why pay full retail new-cow prices for a used cow who’s been giving her milk for free, to other farmers, for decades?


375 posted on 09/28/2019 7:40:47 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 361 | View Replies]

To: kearnyirish2
Under the guise of liberalism, Hollywood has reduced women to little more than sex objects (pretending it is “power”).

Pope Paul VI predicted this in Humanae Vitae back in 1968.

376 posted on 09/28/2019 7:44:40 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 360 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

“Pope Paul VI predicted this in Humanae Vitae back in 1968”

Sure - and nobody will admit he was correct. I couldn’t imagine having a daughter today; the pressure on them (inflicted by Hollywood women, not men) is intense...


377 posted on 09/30/2019 4:22:10 AM PDT by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic warfare against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 376 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360361-377 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson