Skip to comments.
A Mississippi wedding venue rejected an interracial couple, citing ‘Christian belief.’
Washington Post via MSN ^
| 9/3/19
| Allyson Chiu
Posted on 09/03/2019 5:28:06 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 next last
I'd say "I smell a rat" except that apparently the venue has removed their social media presence so it seems to be true. But if that's their deeply held beliefs then regardless how repugnant they may seem to people then they should have a right to adhere to them in the running of their business.
To: DoodleDawg
Does the Nation of Islam receive the same tenacious coverage from our agitprop generating media?
2
posted on
09/03/2019 5:32:33 AM PDT
by
The_Media_never_lie
(Please, oh pretty please let Crazy Uncle Joe Biden be the nominee.)
To: DoodleDawg
Homosexuality is clearly a sin in Christendom, but I don’t recall anything about skin colour being “sinful”. I think they’re just using the term “Christian belief” instead of what it really is....that they just aren’t in favour.
3
posted on
09/03/2019 5:32:51 AM PDT
by
JudyinCanada
(Aim low, avoid disappointment.)
To: DoodleDawg
Riiiiiight. I smell a setup.
4
posted on
09/03/2019 5:34:17 AM PDT
by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
To: DoodleDawg
I find this story as difficult to swallow as this
potage au gelee.
5
posted on
09/03/2019 5:35:39 AM PDT
by
Steely Tom
([Seth Rich] == [the Democrat's John Dean])
To: JudyinCanada
Ditto. If this is true, it will run into public accommodations law in short order. Christian teaching does not recognize race, so conscience is no excuse.
6
posted on
09/03/2019 5:36:22 AM PDT
by
hinckley buzzard
(Power is more often surrendered than seized.)
To: DoodleDawg
In an interracial marriage for 38 years, I endorse everyone’s right to find righteousness in their own understanding. My wife lost her job because her Catholic school principle was prejudiced, but my wife never plays the race card. Those who do are just using it as a pretext. Progressives never protest against Planned Parenthood locating population control outlets in minority areas. Transparent hypocrisy.
To: DoodleDawg; All
The woman later said she discovered she was wrong about Christianity forbidding interracial marriage, and she apologized, saying she was wrong.
8
posted on
09/03/2019 5:42:11 AM PDT
by
marktwain
(President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
To: The_Media_never_lie
Does the Nation of Islam receive the same tenacious coverage from our agitprop generating media? I don't know. Do Muslim venues deny service to interracial couples?
To: DoodleDawg
As I read the story, two good things: 1) the offended party went and talked to the owner and asked them to explain their position, not to an attorney to destroy them. 2) the owner, as. result, reexamined their position, and found that, as I thought, there is no Biblical or Christian induction against interracial marriage. It is something that a lot of people have a strong visceral reaction to, but that doesn’t rise to religious belief, and those things do change over time and with experience.
10
posted on
09/03/2019 5:45:26 AM PDT
by
_longranger81
(Speak up for those who cannot speak for themselves; defend the defenseless; care for the unloved.)
To: JudyinCanada
Yeah...
All the Bible study I did as a kid, and in my teens, and I seem to have missed the scripture that stated: “Thou Shalt Not Miscegenate.”
11
posted on
09/03/2019 5:47:19 AM PDT
by
Kriggerel
("All great truths are hard and bitter, but lies... are sweeter than wild honey" (Ragnar Redbeard))
To: marktwain
The woman later said she discovered she was wrong about Christianity forbidding interracial marriage, and she apologized, saying she was wrong. I was suspicious of the person making the complaint thinking the "...my Christian race, I mean my Christian belief" thing was a leeettle too convenient. But if the venue owner did, in fact, say that then I'll be just as suspicious of her apology and sudden "seen the light" claim as being just a leeetle too convenient as well.
To: DoodleDawg
How OLD is that news story? Here in present-day Kentucky, when a black and white couple get married, the rest of us barely even notice. As for the marriage being un-Christian, I would point to Numbers 12:1, where Moses married a “Kushite” (read: black) woman, and Aaron and Miriam used that as a excuse to challenge his authority. Because God backed Moses, while not saying a word about the marriage, it’s safe to say that God is neither for nor against interracial marriage. Finally, a case can be made that the woman in the Song of Solomon story was a black Egyptian.
13
posted on
09/03/2019 5:49:19 AM PDT
by
Berosus
(I wish I had as much faith in God as liberals have in government.)
To: _longranger81
...the offended party went and talked to the owner and asked them to explain their position, not to an attorney to destroy them. Went to the owner, then went to the press. That may mean the death of the wedding venue as well.
To: Kriggerel
It could be because there were no blacks in Samaria or Judea
15
posted on
09/03/2019 5:49:42 AM PDT
by
bert
( (KE. NP. N.btyC. +12) Progressives are existential American enemies)
To: DoodleDawg
I agree. Paid provocateurs.
16
posted on
09/03/2019 5:53:03 AM PDT
by
momincombatboots
(Ephesians 6... who you are really at war with)
To: bert
Are you certain about that?
To: DoodleDawg
Nation of Islam bigots probably do.
18
posted on
09/03/2019 6:02:45 AM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(Denounce DUAC - The Democrats Un-American Activists Committee)
To: Berosus
Haven’t activists told us that Moses was black? So how is that an interracial marriage?
19
posted on
09/03/2019 6:04:49 AM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(Denounce DUAC - The Democrats Un-American Activists Committee)
To: DoodleDawg
I suspect the Post is indirectly linking this to the Colorado baker, the Oregon couple, etc. To try and head off push back against gays forcing the religious to validate their (gays) life choices.
For now, the Post would never admit it, but I'd almost put real money on it.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson