Posted on 08/21/2019 4:09:25 AM PDT by Kaslin
On her weekly Sinclair TV show, "Full Measure," on Aug. 18, former CBS News correspondent Sharyl Attkisson interviewed pollster Scott Rasmussen about journalists' standing in the public square. They're about as trusted as Wikipedia, the website considered so unreliable that school teachers often tell students they can't cite it as a source for their research papers.
Only 38 percent said national political coverage is accurate and reliable, while 42 percent said it is not. "We asked about national political reporters. Are they credible? Are they reliable?" said Rasmussen. "And you know, a little more than 1 out of 3 people say yes. When we ask about Wikipedia, we get the exact same answer. So what's -- what's happening is we have a world where people look at journalists like they look at Wikipedia."
You hear the media elites often break out the nostalgia for an era when the American people had "shared facts." Translation: a time when all Americans had the "mainstream" media to tell them what the "facts" were, and when those in that "mainstream" enjoyed a monopoly in their industry. Facts always seemed carefully arranged for political impact. For example, the TV anchors told us the Vietnam War was an unwinnable quagmire. Watergate was the worst scandal in American history. The Soviet Union only wanted peace. The wealthy were greedy. Planet Earth would succumb to global warming. And Planned Parenthood cares about children.
All this created a national hunger for alternative sources of information. The addition of Fox News, conservative talk radio, and conservative news websites and blogs in the '90s is decried as the dawn of a new era of "misinformation."
The media's dramatic tilt has clearly taken a toll on their image. Rasmussen told Attkisson that 78 percent of voters say reporters don't report news so much as they promote their agenda: "They think they use incidents as props for their agenda rather than seeking accurate record of what happened. ... Only 14 percent think that a journalist is actually reporting what happened."
That result is just devastating. The "news" media no longer exist.
Then Rasmussen added a layer of public cynicism: "If a reporter found out something that would hurt their favorite candidate, only 36 percent of voters think that they would report that." The public sees the media for what they are: flagrant activists manipulating the democratic process.
Attkisson also interviewed former CNN anchor Frank Sesno to react to this massive credibility problem. Sesno toed the company line and, in so doing, tripped over his own tongue. "The public understands fundamentally what journalism should be," he said. "They don't understand how it's actually practiced." What does that mean? The public isn't well-informed enough to know how well-informed it would be if it were to trust the press?
If media organizations really wanted to improve their image, they would address public skepticism seriously, taking some very simple steps. Stop trying to bury every bit of good news for President Trump and every bit of bad news for Bernie, Biden & Co. Try to acknowledge that policy debates have two sides. It is fair to question climate change, support our national identity and oppose the abortion industry trafficking human carnage.
Is it too late? Conservatives have walked away from these networks and newspapers, which means that their audiences are now mostly liberals who reject everything conservatives champion. Obviously, from all we've witnessed, liberal journalists are much more sensitive to criticism from fellow liberals than they are to the American public. That's unlikely to change, so the credibility crisis will only deepen.
I cannot use the W/Post or NYT as cat pan liners. Cat refuses to go there.
Anyone read the article last week in the Washington post where this slimebag - Luke O’Neil - claimed Trump blamed the El Paso victims for their own deaths? I couldn’t believe it, just a flat out outrageous lie and I actually found this absolute d-bag O’Neil on Twitter and wrote to him, asking him where the hell he gets off writing such BS, that he’s a prime example of everything wrong with the media today and Twitter BANNED ME!!
I don’t know in what order to put politicians, used car salesmen and msm anymore in terms of trust.
Credibility problem? First they would have to have any for it to be a problem. The MSM has shown itself to be so agenda driven, so blinded by politics that they now have zero credibility, zero integrity. If they said the sky was blue I’d still go check for myself. MSM “journalist” ... snort ... they should consider moving up in the world, maybe to pimp or something...
Facebook and Twitter, I’m told, are a huge part of the misinformation problem. I can’t speak firsthand because I don’t follow either.
The only consequences for not reporting the truth is low ratings. Cable subscribers still pick up the tab for CNN and MSNBC, regardless of how many people actually watch. Reporters reporting their own Trump hatred is not the news.
Answer:
Used car salesman. Having once been one, I can tell you, all the used car salesman wants to do is sell you a car/make money. He has no hidden agendas.
Quickly the nation is returning to thirds
The leftist newspapers are polluting the planet.
They need to stop it now!
It’s AMAZING how much profit is built into the price.
I threw out a Ridiculous price on a used camaro once and then just started to go so the guy said ok.
It was advertised for like 17k, i offered 13k and he said yes.
And he STILL made a profit, didn’t he?
Always lowball on used cars.
That could describe any fundraiser thrown by bill and Hillary.
Back in the 90s, I subscribed to Time magazine. I cancelled this subscription when the lead editorial announced with great fanfare their change in policy. Time would continue to report the news but they would also begin to tell me what I should think about the reported news. I had no need to be told ‘what to think’.
It is not that the news media is biased, it has always been biased. It is that there is so little counter balance to their point of view.
The media is used to shut down any opposition by use of intimidation, harassment and name calling.
So Rush Limbaugh is not to be trusted but Walter Cronkite was a saint. Phooey, they both have agendas, but at least Rush is open about his views while Uncle Walter pretended to be fair as he lied either directly or by omission to the American people.
“trust” at this point, applies less and less, everywhere.
Read about how Walter Cronkite was a raging liberal in private and it’s easy to understand that the news has ALWAYS been cooked. Thank God for the Internet to get around the filters.
Example of fake news.
Sinclairs soldiers, I believe 44 news stations, all saying the same thing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_fHfgU8oMSo
I dropped the content portion of my cable subscription a couple years ago and now use it only for internet access. I know it still goes into the same pot but now there is less of it to feed the presstitutes and bilge merchants.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.