Replies

>>Joe the God Denier says, “By the way, you may wonder why I bring up Holocaust denial. One reason is, when I read this from Kalamata, it is almost word-for-word the language of Holocaust deniers I debated nearly 20 years ago. They pretend they’ve already scored points, won the argument and so do their little end-zone victory dance. Of course that’s absurd and they’re actually dancing in their own endzone!”

You are a shameless liar, Alinsky Joe.

I now know why you brought it up. I could not understand why someone claiming to be a Freeper would stoop as low as a CNN anchor, so I did a little background research from the works of those you admire — well-known bigots such as Dawkins, Shermer, Prothero, et al.. I soon learned that the act of applying the label of “holocaust denier” to those who reject the foolishness of evolutionism/atheism was the easiest way of dehumanizing them. That is, by marginalizing or dehumanizing those who believe in the creation narrative of Moses, athiests have been successful in suppressing opposition to the alternate creation narrative given to them by their prophet, Charlie Darwin.

That is exactly the same tactic the radical left uses against conservatives when they play the Race Card or the Nazi Card; and that is exactly the same tactic the Nazis used against the Jews. You will find a lot of holocaust deniers in that mix, but they are okay with Joe as long as they do not criticize Darwin.

When you get tired of trying to dehumanizing me, perhaps you will take the time to show us some scientific evidence for evolutionism.

Mr. Kalamata

Kalamata: "You are a shameless liar, Alinsky Joe."

No, I'm a shameless truth-teller, but you have yet to violate even one of my discovered "Rules for Deniers", post #272 above.

Kalamata: "I now know why you brought it up.
I could not understand why someone claiming to be a Freeper would stoop as low as a CNN anchor, so I did a little background research from the works of those you admire — well-known bigots such as Dawkins, Shermer, Prothero, et al.."

Calling atheists "bigots" is a bit rich, setting that aside:

"Prothero": never heard of before you named him.
"Dawkins": did hear of, never read, from what I know, Dawkins is an atheist whose theological views I disagree with.
"Shermer": have read, liked & used his book opposing Holocaust deniers, nothing else.

Kalamata: "I soon learned that the act of applying the label of “holocaust denier” to those who reject the foolishness of evolutionism/atheism was the easiest way of dehumanizing them.
That is, by marginalizing or dehumanizing those who believe in the creation narrative of Moses, athiests have been successful in suppressing opposition to the alternate creation narrative given to them by their prophet, Charlie Darwin."

Here's what I know for certain: nearly 20 years ago, when I debated at length Holocaust deniers, they were vastly more vulgar than Kalamata, but that aside, the rest of their tactics, techniques & patterns were the same as yours. FRiend.
In post #272 above I tried to boil down those similarities into a set of practices I'm calling, "Rules for Deniers".

Kalamata: "That is exactly the same tactic the radical left uses against conservatives when they play the Race Card or the Nazi Card; and that is exactly the same tactic the Nazis used against the Jews.
You will find a lot of holocaust deniers in that mix, but they are okay with Joe as long as they do not criticize Darwin."

I'm saying this: as long as you follow my "Rules for Deniers", you're a denier, period.
Do you want to stop being a denier??
Then break my "rules"! Tell the truth! Stop substituting insults for data.

Kalamata: "When you get tired of trying to dehumanizing me, perhaps you will take the time to show us some scientific evidence for evolutionism."

You can find evidence in any natural-history museum.
You can find explanations in any text book on the subject.