[RummyChick]

he walked it back
there are three possibilities

Guilty but we didnt indict because of OIC - leiu interpreation

we decided..Not Guilty

Maybe yes may no who knows we didnt look because of OIC...his walk back

maybe another interpretation I havent thought of

[FlingWingFlyer]

Where the heck did they find this idiot, Speier? Mueller is up there participating in the conspiracy to overthrow the president and she calls him “the greatest patriot”? Must be another one of those Democrat “values” one of the prior idiots talked about.

[Yardstick]

Guilty but we didnt indict because of OIC - leiu interpreation

---

This is still Mueller’s position, with the minor correction that “we didn’t indict” was the wrong phrasing since Mueller obviously didn’t have the power to indict.

Rush just played Mueller’s correction and it’s clear it was just a minor correction, not a major walkback.

Mueller is still saying the only thing that kept him from recommending indictment was the OIC guideline. So he is standing by his main point.

This still puts him at direct odds with Barr, who said Mueller told him repeatedly that the OIC guideline was NOT the only reason.

[monkeyshine]

See #1530 - NImerc has a different interpretation and if he’s right then I agree the recanting is a bigger deal than I originally thought. It sort of depends on what Lieu asked and what the answer was (obviously). Perhaps I didn’t fully understand what Lieu asked and received in reply.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3766336/posts?page=1530#1530