Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal judge permanently blocks citizenship question from census
KION ^ | Jul 16, 2019 | Jessica Schneider

Posted on 07/16/2019 2:15:42 PM PDT by artichokegrower

A New York federal judge has issued an order definitively blocking the Trump administration from adding a citizenship question to the 2020 census in any form, despite the administration's insistence it has abandoned plans to add a question on the census.

(Excerpt) Read more at kion546.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: census; clownbammyjudge; fedjudgepresident; jessefurman; newyork; obamajudge; obamajudges; obamaposjudge
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 next last
To: artichokegrower

The Constitutionality of it has already been ruled on.

Awaiting only the procedural/process rule.


81 posted on 07/16/2019 3:59:11 PM PDT by LS ("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Ruled by New York Judge.

FU New York! Go F yourself.

We are not ruled by arrogant New York.


82 posted on 07/16/2019 4:02:14 PM PDT by TheNext (Diversity: Darker Replaces Lighter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scott from the Left Coast

Looks like we’re gonna need a bigger GITMO???


83 posted on 07/16/2019 4:03:39 PM PDT by Oscar in Batangas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

Cannot these guys have an accident.


84 posted on 07/16/2019 4:03:46 PM PDT by Mouton (The media is the enemy of the people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp
" Federal judge permanently blocks citizenship question from census Tell that f***ing @$$wipe to go F*** himself, and then put the question on there anyway. I'm tired of these little bitches thinking they run something. "

Way past time for this. Put the damn question on there and tell the courts to pound sand. I think we are in some ways doing this to ourselves by putting so much emphasis on judicial nominations. We should be putting our effort into taking power back from the judicial branch, making judges accountable through impeachment and getting rid of lifetime appointments.

85 posted on 07/16/2019 4:04:20 PM PDT by precisionshootist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

“I’m just going to write in “citizen” at the top of my census form.”

I did that for the 2020 census where it asked for my ethnicity. However, I was more specific: I wrote AMERICAN citizen.


86 posted on 07/16/2019 4:22:30 PM PDT by ought-six (Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

87 posted on 07/16/2019 4:26:59 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

As Ayn Rand asked on a different issue/policy: BY WHAT RIGHT? The Judiciary is completely out of its league on this.


88 posted on 07/16/2019 4:29:46 PM PDT by ReleaseTheHounds ("The problem with Socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money." M. Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower
A New York feral judge.
89 posted on 07/16/2019 4:31:48 PM PDT by windsorknot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Amendment10

Not the point.

We still want the question in the (bleeping) Census.


90 posted on 07/16/2019 4:33:03 PM PDT by Pikachu_Dad ("the media are selling you a line of soap)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

Once the superior court decides on a question of law, they send it back to the inferior court to decide based on the superior court ruling. Anyone know what the SCOTUS decided? Any inferior court decision against the superior court decision cannot stand.


91 posted on 07/16/2019 4:46:11 PM PDT by SgtHooper (If you remember the 60's, YOU WEREN'T THERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

Once the superior court decides on a question of law, they send it back to the inferior court to decide based on the superior court ruling. Anyone know what the SCOTUS decided? Any inferior court decision against the superior court decision cannot stand.


92 posted on 07/16/2019 4:46:12 PM PDT by SgtHooper (If you remember the 60's, YOU WEREN'T THERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

He was appointed by god: “President Barack Obama nominated Furman”


93 posted on 07/16/2019 4:47:51 PM PDT by antidemoncrat (yawn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519

The attorneys who argued the case at SC messed up by saying it was for Voter Act. All they had to say it was on there for 100’s of years until 2000 when previous President removed it. I personally believe the attorneys sabotaged the case on purpose and thus the reason DOJ fired them and wanted to replace them with new attorneys.


94 posted on 07/16/2019 4:50:59 PM PDT by Engedi (ui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower
"We are ruled by non-elected judges "

The best solution, IMHO, is to import and distribute (strategically) about 300 of those classic Soviet/Russian umbrellas...

95 posted on 07/16/2019 4:57:08 PM PDT by SuperLuminal (Where is Sam Adams now that we desperately need him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower
At the end of the Census form:

Signed: _______________________________

Citizen of the United States of America.

:)

96 posted on 07/16/2019 4:59:54 PM PDT by Does so (A mysterious nuclear explosion would have the fingerprints of Uranium One!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519

Census workers only contact a small percentage of homes...those that do not return their survey....it is about 10% or so.


97 posted on 07/16/2019 5:06:45 PM PDT by Dave W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Do it anyway, Mr President. Absolve, in advance, those who will implement, but do it!

It’s well past time for a showdown with these activist judges legislating from the bench.


98 posted on 07/16/2019 5:08:41 PM PDT by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. Mr Trump, we've got your six.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Checks and Balances are gone:

Any Federal Judge can check anything or anyone in the Executive Branch immediately and categorically, and the entire Executive Branch has no viable recourse - except lengthy lawfare lawsuits that further the left’s purposes.

Where is Andrew Jackson?


99 posted on 07/16/2019 5:14:25 PM PDT by YogicCowboy ("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - J. R. R. Tolkien)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

WRITE IT ON THE FORM.


100 posted on 07/16/2019 5:28:01 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (Denounce DUAC - The Democrats Un-American Activists Committee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson