Or: "Could it be possible that all of this earthquake activity is leading up to NOTHING?" (Could, may, might, possibly effect.)
Link goes to zerohedgefund which is disallowed. But, we all know that this was caused by expansion due to glowbull warming/discombobulation. Heck even manbearpig can figure this one out.
1 posted on
07/12/2019 8:30:35 AM PDT by
rktman
To: rktman
I’m all shook up...hey hey hey...
To: rktman
I guess Gaia is expressing her outrage of all the migrants coming into the USA.
3 posted on
07/12/2019 8:33:09 AM PDT by
Cowboy Bob
("Other People's Money" = The life blood of Liberalism)
To: rktman
Is that was has Nancy Pelosi trembling these days?
4 posted on
07/12/2019 8:34:02 AM PDT by
a fool in paradise
(TDenounce DUAC - The Democrats Un-American Activists Committee)
To: rktman
Pack-up the U-Haul, Edna!
5 posted on
07/12/2019 8:34:14 AM PDT by
Carriage Hill
(A society grows great when old men plant trees, in whose shade they know they will never sit.)
To: rktman
I followed a link here the other day that showed a wave of earthquakes across the nation after the second one hit in Ridegcrest.
6 posted on
07/12/2019 8:34:46 AM PDT by
JohnnyP
(Thinking is hard work (I stole that from Rush).)
To: rktman
I am of the opinion that a lot of little shakes are way better than one big one.
8 posted on
07/12/2019 8:36:07 AM PDT by
taxcontrol
(Stupid should hurt - dad's wisdom)
To: rktman
I think there is mining done in many parts of Nevada.
Hopefully these these quakes are inhibiting operations or threatening mining altogether.
Also, there used to be testing of atomic bombs deep under Nevada desert I think? Does that still go on? That may be a non-natural contributor to the quakes.
Just asking a question; not making any statements or pretending to have any special knowledge in this area.
9 posted on
07/12/2019 8:36:28 AM PDT by
MichaelCorleone
(Jesus Christ is not a religion. He's the Truth.)
To: rktman
This is just re-settling.
Before the 1906, there were 4-6 major quakes 20 years before scattered around this area, LA and north of SF.
The two recent ones are an indicator something is changing but not necessarily a Big One indicator as they were not on the San Andreas.
Now if we get a 7 on the San Andreas midway between LA and SF in 2-4 years, ok now its time to worry.
10 posted on
07/12/2019 8:37:00 AM PDT by
Zathras
To: rktman
..... I think .... (And this is just a theory) .... That there have been so many people flowing into Southern California from south of the border that the added weight of all of those Illegals caused the state to “Crack.”
12 posted on
07/12/2019 8:38:24 AM PDT by
R_Kangel
("A nation of sheep will beget a nation ruled by wolves")
To: rktman
A bunch of fearmongering from WND.
There are earthquakes every day.
To: rktman
we all know that this was caused by expansion due to glowbull warming/discombobulation.
I take a different Approach:
The expansion from Global Warming has been Preventing Earthquakes, only after AB32 the Global Warming Solutions Act rammed thru by the Girly Man, did the earthquakes start happening, they were caused by the Artificial Cooling created by California's Aggressive CO2 Action.
16 posted on
07/12/2019 8:41:51 AM PDT by
eyeamok
To: rktman
Maybe we in Arizona will soon have that beachfront property
20 posted on
07/12/2019 8:45:03 AM PDT by
clamper1797
(We are getting close to the last "box")
To: rktman
Maybe it’s the CO2........./s
22 posted on
07/12/2019 8:51:36 AM PDT by
Lurkinanloomin
(Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here Of Citizen Parents_Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
To: rktman
I've been watching the Caltech site for years searching for patterns. Right now, the San Andreas pattern is pretty normal showing little popcorn quakes. The Ridgecrest quake is showing lots of aftershocks, not new activity.
One thing that is a precursor to activity in SoCal is a big quake off of Petrolia in Northern California. There always seems to be a reciprocal quake in SOCal or Nevada when one of those occur.
23 posted on
07/12/2019 8:54:29 AM PDT by
pfflier
To: rktman
I have seen that map show 8,000 for a week even though none were reported. They just have a lot every week anyways, mostly small ones never felt. But over 10k is probably close to the record.
To: rktman
It’s called a gradual release and reduction of pressure deep within the erf. It should be called a good thing. The alternative is scary.
29 posted on
07/12/2019 9:07:53 AM PDT by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi - Monthly Donors Rock!!!)
To: rktman
I had very bad news from our local news station yesterday.
The reporter said absolutely that the current spate of earthquakes would not cause California to fall into the ocean.
Very bad news, indeed.
39 posted on
07/12/2019 9:52:55 AM PDT by
righttackle44
(Take scalps. Leave the bodies as a warning.)
To: rktman
Well the Kalifornians understand this is all Trump’s fault
53 posted on
07/13/2019 9:36:02 AM PDT by
okie 54
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson