Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ambassador leaks are a 'matter of regret', Britain tells U.S.
Reuters ^ | 07/08/19 | Staff

Posted on 07/08/2019 10:11:51 AM PDT by yesthatjallen

Britain’s government has told Washington that leaks of memos in which the UK ambassador described U.S. President Donald Trump’s administration as “dysfunctional” were a matter of regret, the Prime Minister Theresa May’s spokesman said on Monday.

The memos from Kim Darroch, the ambassador to Washington, were leaked to a Sunday newspaper, annoying U.S. President Donald Trump and triggering demands on the British side to find out who had disclosed them.

“Contact has been made with the Trump administration setting out our view that we believe the leak in unacceptable. It is, of course, a matter of regret that this has happened,” May’s spokesman told reporters.

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: britain; darroch; england; europe; trump; trumpuk; ukambassador
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last
To: taxcontrol

Its not the point. The ambassador can say whatever he likes. After all, it was never for public consumption. HMG don’t have to accept or believe his comments, but he is there as their “inside man” and they really have to back him up. The fault lies with whoever has leaked these messages. That has several affects. Firstly obviously its very embarrassing for the Ambassador and HMG; but secondly if ambassadors get the idea that they cannot speak freely because their comments will get leaked, they are not going to express themselves freely, particularly if the precedent is established of HMG throwing them under the bus.

I think personally his position is now untenable, but because Trump tweeted his displeasure to all and sundry, they can’t recall him. My guess is that he will be “asked” to resign. Apparently he was due to retire at the end of the year anyway.


41 posted on 07/08/2019 4:34:53 PM PDT by Vanders9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

That’s silly. And its untrue. None of the countries you mentioned HAD to back the US in Desert Storm.


42 posted on 07/08/2019 4:36:03 PM PDT by Vanders9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Ouchthatonehurt

They most certainly did not. Whoever did it should be up on a treason charge. Unless of course it was the Russians.


43 posted on 07/08/2019 4:37:26 PM PDT by Vanders9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: catnipman

No thats not true. They did say they didnt agree with the Ambassador’s comments. But they can’t disavow them or it will look subservient.


44 posted on 07/08/2019 4:39:07 PM PDT by Vanders9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson