Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AOC says only a 'sea sponge' would believe her '12 years' doomsday remark, but most Dems bought it
Fox News ^ | 5-23-19 | Lukas Mikelionis

Posted on 05/28/2019 4:48:55 AM PDT by SJackson

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s claim that the world will “end in 12 years” unless climate change is tackled was accepted as a fact by two-thirds of Democrats, even though she said herself that only those with the “social intelligence of a sea sponge” could actually believe it.

The New York Democrat drew mockery from Republicans after she made the doomsday warning in a bid to convince people that radical action against climate change is needed.

“Millennials and people, you know, Gen Z and all these folks that will come after us are looking up and we’re like: ‘The world is gonna end in 12 years if we don’t address climate change and your biggest issue is how are we gonna pay for it?'” Ocasio-Cortez said. A few months later she repeated the claim again.

Earlier this month, however, Ocasio-Cortez backtracked on the gloomy forecast and instead blamed the Republican Party for taking her humor and sarcasm literally.

"This is a technique of the GOP, to take dry humor + sarcasm literally and 'fact check' it," she wrote.

But it appears that more than two-thirds of surveyed Democrats took her literally.

A Rasmussen poll, conducted earlier this week, found 67 percent of Democrats believing that the U.S. has only 12 years to avert the “disastrous and irreparable damage to the country and the world” stemming from climate change. Out of all total likely voters, 48 percent of respondents believed the apocalyptic claim.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aoc; crazywomen; envirowhackos; greennewdeal
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last
To: All

AOC will be (cough) glad to know all of her campaign finances are being fact-checked — smirk.

AOC has a lot more in common with Bernie than socialism.

Besides socialism (gag)....AOC’s COS used to be Bernie’s....wait for it.....”Director of Organizing Technology.”

BACKSTORY: “Justice Democrats” and “Brand New Congress” are a group of Bernie Sanders ex-staffers who decided 2018 midterms
should be all about Bernie’s policies, finding 400 Bernie carbon copies to dump into races. They held auditions. AOC was hired to run in NY.

NOTE
<><> “Brand New Congress” mastermind is Saikat Chakrabarti
<><> “Justice Democrats” is Cenk Uygur, a Turkish-born Muslim.
Making a pile of money musta been a huge incentive. Read on.

FAST FORWARD TO TODAY.......an FEC complaint was filed alleging AOC’s COS, Saikat Chakrabarti, created multiple
private companies—LLCs—to siphon off campaign contributions from her various PACs for personal use......

AND THIS—Saikat Chakrabarti, is a proven tech expert.
(A) He co-founded a web design tool,
(B) He built up the product team at the payment processor “Stripe”.........
(C) He then came to the Sanders campaign after (cough) growing disillusioned with the tech world.
Saikat Chakrabarti was Bernie’s Director of Organizing Technology. Even old man Bernie knew enough to hire a tech expert.

So, I guess (smirk) Chakrabarti’s tech skills musta come in mighty handy when donations to Bernie were
wire-transferred to the DNC and ended up in 2016 candidate Hillary’s account.
Debbie W/S headed the DNC at the time and was ousted b/c of her bias for Hillary.

Course, none of us heard about any of this, but.....
<><> Chakrabarti-the-tech-whiz did find out about the DNC theft, didnt he?
<><> Chakrabarti did speak to D/W/S about it, or to Debbie’s tech expert, Imran Awan, didnt he?
<><> Chakrabarti did tell Bernie he was fleeced, didnt he?
<><> Chakrabarti WAS working for Bernie, wasnt he?

Now the stunning details about that FEC complaint:

The FEC complaint asserts that AOC’s COS, Saikat Chakrabarti, early on established two PACs that raised big bucks for AOC’s campaign:
<><> the “Brand New Congress PAC,” and,
<><> the “Justice Democrats PAC.”

After mucho money was raised, Chakrabarti systematically transferred $885,000+ in PAC contributions to his private companies with similar names:
<><> the “Brand New Campaign LLC,” and,
<><> the “ Brand New Congress LLC.”

Saikat Chakrabarti’s private companies, unlike PACs, are exempt from reporting all of their significant expenditures.

NOTE WELL: it’s a much-used criminal act to enrich oneself, to open bank accounts using similarly named
entities to siphon off money, to hide it from partners, associates, investors etc.

SIPHONINGS A CINCH It’s easy to siphon off money for oneself by putting checks into the new accounts with similar names, depositing checks that were made out to
the original entity. Even your bank advises that if a check-writer “mis-spelled” your name, to just endorse the check with the correct name.

AND PRESTO: a check made out to Brand New Congress PAC, is deposited in the Brand New Congress LLC account.

ANALYSIS -— Chakrabarti’s companies appear to have been set up for the sole purpose of obscuring how AOC’s donations were used. The arrangement skirted reporting requirements and may have violated the $5,000 limit on contributions, according to the FEC complaint filed by the National Legal and Policy Center, a government watchdog group.

Campaign finance attorneys described the arrangement as “really weird” and an indication “there’s something amiss.” They said there was no way of telling where the political donations went — meaning (A) the donations could have been pocketed, or, (B) used by the LLC’s to pay for off-the-books campaign operations.-—SNIP-—SOURCED FROM FR.

JUST WONDERING .....does Chakrabarti have a reputation among Democraps for facilitating the conversion of campaign donations?

Maybe we should ask millionaire landowner Socialist Bernie (smirk)?


41 posted on 05/28/2019 6:20:38 AM PDT by Liz ( Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
This is a technique of the GOP, to take dry humor + sarcasm literally and 'fact check' it," she wrote.

I think it is actually a technique of the progressives - to issue a serious statement and when it is found to generate public ridicule claim you were being sarcastic and the other side are idiots for not understanding the “nuances” involved.

42 posted on 05/28/2019 6:22:15 AM PDT by Mr. Jeeves ([CTRL]-[GALT]-[DELETE])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

She is an actress reading a script.


43 posted on 05/28/2019 6:24:06 AM PDT by DungeonMaster (Prov 24: Do not fret because of evildoers. Do not associate with those given to change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

We’ve heard the same “10-15 years til the end of the world” for four decades. It is a TROPE for them.

U.N. predicts disaster if global warming not checked - June 29 1989, Peter Spielman
https://www.apnews.com/bd45c372caf118ec99964ea547880cd0

UNITED NATIONS (AP) _ A senior U.N. environmental official says entire nations could be wiped off the face of the Earth by rising sea levels if the global warming trend is not reversed by the year 2000.


44 posted on 05/28/2019 6:29:27 AM PDT by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JudyinCanada
She misstated the “12 year time frame” comment which has gone round and round in the news. And that means she just plagerizing other folks....which is what she does on a continuous basis. Not an original thought in that pea brain.
45 posted on 05/28/2019 6:34:44 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: All
This is also being fact-checked in case the tax dollars "accidentally" went to a French Polynesia numbered bank account.

SOURCE: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/jan/18/barack-obama-transfers-500m-to-green-climate-fund-in-attempt-to-protect-paris-deal

Obama transfers $500m from State Dept to Green Climate Fund to protect Paris deal;
Obama used "executive powers" bypassing Congress and public scrutiny

The Guardian, Michael Slezak, Tue 17 Jan 2017

Obama sent a second $500m instalment to the Green Climate Fund just three days before exiting office. Photograph: Evan Vucci/AP

Barack Obama has heeded calls to help secure the future of the historic Paris agreement by transferring a second $500m instalment to the Green Climate Fund, just three days before he leaves office.

The money $500M tax dollars is being drawn from the state department, the same way that the first transfer was,
allowing it to be done using executive powers without congressional support.

The fund was a key aspect of the Paris agreement signed in 2015, which aims to keep global warming “well below” 2C and aspires to keep warming to 1.5C. Established in 2010, it is financed by wealthy countries and used to assistdeveloping countries with adaptation and mitigation. It was widely seen as a key measure to bring both rich and poor countries to the negotiating table.

The US committed to transferring $3bn to the fund. The new instalment leaves $2bn owing, with the incoming president, Donald Trump, expected to cease any further payments. The move followed a large campaign, with more than 100 organisations and nearly 100,000 people calling for Obama to transfer the full $2.5bn owed to the fund.

“The Obama administration is refusing to let president-elect Trump’s posse of oil barons and climate deniers dictate how the world responds to the climate crisis,” said Tamar Lawrence-Samuel, of Corporate Accountability International, which led the campaign.

“Tens of thousands of people around the world called on President Obama to step up before Trump takes the keys of our government and tries to reverse decades of climate progress,” she said. “This victory is the climate justice movement’s opening salvo to the Trump presidency. And we’re not going away.”

46 posted on 05/28/2019 6:47:29 AM PDT by Liz ( Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Does anyone else remember those little sea sponges in Diane Feinstein's office?

Nobody corrected them or called them fools.
Not AOC (until now), not even Diane.

47 posted on 05/28/2019 6:54:24 AM PDT by lewislynn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
"This is a technique of the GOP, to take dry humor + sarcasm literally and 'fact check' it," she wrote.

Sort of like when candidate Trump says "Russia, if you're listening, I hope you can find Hillary's emails" at a Presidential debate, and you open a Russian Collusion investigation.

48 posted on 05/28/2019 7:34:39 AM PDT by Yo-Yo ( is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

49 posted on 05/28/2019 7:37:49 AM PDT by HotHunt (Been there. Done that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JudyinCanada

And, if it really were a joke, then “climate change” is obviously not a serious issue.


50 posted on 05/28/2019 7:43:24 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Liz

2017/jan/18/barack-obama-transfers-500m-to-green-climate-fund-in-attempt-to-protect-paris-deal.

So Paris is his new code name.


51 posted on 05/28/2019 8:34:16 AM PDT by Vaduz (women and children to be impacIQ of chimpsted the most.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I wish it were a joke. AOC is just covering her stupid ass for an asinine statement. The impact on Lefties is quite telling.

Just a couple of weeks ago, my DH and I attended the Maker Faire in San Mateo, CA. It’s an interesting exhibition of people and companies that make cool stuff, with a heavy emphasis on everyday technology. Lots of Silicon Valley people attend who are considered curious and intelligent. We passed by a speaker on one of the stages who was talking about the “fact” that we have about 12 years to go before the earth is uninhabitable.

I just shook my head and thought “the fear programming to sell a product or induce panic amongst supposedly smart and not so smart people is strong.” Thanks AOC and the Globalist idiots who brought us Climate Change to drum up more tax dollars and keep the populace afraid.


52 posted on 05/28/2019 10:45:34 AM PDT by demnomo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

So she called a large portion of her constituents sea sponges, just to slam people on the right who questioned her ridiculous rant. Yeah, we want her in charge of nukes, not.


53 posted on 05/28/2019 11:23:04 AM PDT by justa-hairyape (The user name is sarcastic. Although at times it may not appear that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
in other words, her core constituency
54 posted on 05/28/2019 2:40:22 PM PDT by Chode ( WeÂ’re America, Bitch!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chode

Think about it, she’s 30. Trump loses in 2020 when she’s 32, she won’t defeat an incumbant, she’ll have to wait till 2028 when she’s 39. The world ends 2031, if history continues, she’ll be in office at the end of the world. In I think may be the likely event President Trump wins a second term, she’s still waiting till 2024. Gives her two years to win a second term, to preside over the death of the planet. From warming. How can you make a movie about the world ending over warming. I won’t begin to mention the end of the world movies, we usually win, global warming movie starring AOC won’t make it.


55 posted on 05/28/2019 5:31:04 PM PDT by SJackson (If youÂ’re wondering whatÂ’s wrong with capitalism, itÂ’s made in Hong Kong, B. Sanders, when in Rus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

100%


56 posted on 05/28/2019 5:45:13 PM PDT by Chode ( WeÂ’re America, Bitch!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson