Posted on 05/02/2019 8:58:26 PM PDT by Liz
Update: In response to a question Tuesday from NBC News reporter Andrea Mitchell, former Obama White House National Security Adviser Susan Rice denied that she prepared spreadsheets of surveilled telephone calls involving Donald Trump and his aides. The Daily Caller News Foundation Investigative Group, however, reported that Rice ordered the spreadsheets to be produced.
In addition, former U.S. Attorney Joe DiGenova, one of TheDCNFs sources, said Tuesday in response to Rice that her denial would come as quite a surprise to the government officials who have reviewed dozens of those spreadsheets.
Former President Barack Obamas national security adviser Susan Rice ordered U.S. spy agencies to produce detailed spreadsheets of legal phone calls involving Donald Trump and his aides when he was running for president, according to former U.S. Attorney Joseph diGenova.
What was produced by the intelligence community at the request of Ms. Rice were detailed spreadsheets of intercepted phone calls with unmasked Trump associates in perfectly legal conversations with individuals, diGenova told The Daily Caller News Foundation Investigative Group Monday.
The overheard conversations involved no illegal activity by anybody of the Trump associates, or anyone they were speaking with, diGenova said. In short, the only apparent illegal activity was the unmasking of the people in the calls.
Other official sources with direct knowledge and who requested anonymity confirmed to TheDCNF diGenovas description of surveillance reports Rice ordered one year before the 2016 presidential election.
Also on Monday, Fox News and Bloomberg News, citing multiple sources reported that Rice had requested the intelligence information that was produced in a highly organized operation. Fox said the unmasked names of Trump aides were given to officials at the National Security Council (NSC), the Department of Defense, James Clapper, President Obamas Director of National Intelligence, and John Brennan, Obamas CIA Director.
Joining Rice in the alleged White House operations was her deputy Ben Rhodes, according to Fox.
Critics of the atmosphere prevailing throughout the Obama administrations last year in office point to former Obama Deputy Defense Secretary Evelyn Farkas who admitted in a March 2 television interview on MSNBC that she was urging my former colleagues, to get as much information as you can, get as much intelligence as you can, before President Obama leaves the administration.
Farkas sought to walk back her comments in the weeks following: I didnt give anybody anything except advice.
Col. (Ret.) James Waurishuk, an NSC veteran and former deputy director for intelligence at the U.S. Central Command, told TheDCNF that many hands had to be involved throughout the Obama administration to launch such a political spying program.
The surveillance initially is the responsibility of the National Security Agency, Waurishuk said. They have to abide by this guidance when one of the other agencies says, were looking at this particular person which we would like to unmask.'
The lawyers and counsel at the NSA surely would be talking to the lawyers and members of counsel at CIA, or at the National Security Council or at the Director of National Intelligence or at the FBI, he said. Its unbelievable of the level and degree of the administration to look for information on Donald Trump and his associates, his campaign team and his transition team. This is really, really serious stuff.
Michael Doran, former NSC senior director, told TheDCNF Monday that somebody blew a hole in the wall between national security secrets and partisan politics. This was a stream of information that was supposed to be hermetically sealed from politics and the Obama administration found a way to blow a hole in that wall, he said.
Doran charged that potential serious crimes were undertaken because this is a leaking of signal intelligence.
Thats a felony, he told TheDCNF. And you can get 10 years for that. It is a tremendous abuse of the system. Were not supposed to be monitoring American citizens. Bigger than the crime, is the breach of public trust.
Waurishuk said he was most dismayed that this is now using national intelligence assets and capabilities to spy on the elected, yet-to-be-seated president.
Were looking at a potential constitutional crisis from the standpoint that we used an extremely strong capability thats supposed to be used to safeguard and protect the country, he said. And we used it for political purposes by a sitting president. That takes on a new precedent.
The coverup and obstruction that followed were even bigger crimes.
The whole Russia hoax was part of a massive conspiracy to coverup crimes and obstruct any potential investigation of those crimes.
Well, she didn’t prepare them.
She had them prepared
There is a difference.../S
My brother and I watched with baited breath that night and when they South Carolina we jumped for joy
Forget the sarcasm tag. That’s probably just the semantic dodge she’s relying on.
I don’t care if they don’t go to jail but their lives and lying narratives need to be exposed and financially ruined forever, no profiting from the crime and the Democratic party needs to be destroyed.
The dam is breaking and information is going to honest DOJ and Inspector General offices. This is going to be a scandal that will shake the foundations of our Republic and probably bury the Democrat party.
It might also threaten the Republic itself...the criminal political establishment will not go down without resorting to extreme sustained violence...in the streets. And they have the money and organization to conduct it across the nation.
Zactly
They already have the brown shirt thugs of Antifa organized and in the streets, but I don’t think those masked wannabes have it in them to face up to bikers, red neck deplorables and NRA members.
When the balloon goes up, where do you figure the Clintons and Obamas will flee to.???
When the balloon goes up, where do you figure the Clintons and Obamas will flee to.???
Id put short odds on New Zealand.
Dear my future self for no suspicious reason: The President emphasized we were to do everything BY THE BOOK, extra for sure.
Noooooothing suspicious about THAT.
Nope...’ we could spy on 100s of Trump associates,wiretap their offices, infiltrate their groups....BUT IT WOULD BE ILLEGAL’
‘I am writing this morning to document that I am NOT going out drinking with friends tonight, and that is NOT the reason I won't be home until late.'
> Rice ordered one year before the 2016 presidential election
Suddenly the official version of when this got started just got shoved back another six months.
More likely than Obama would be the Persian serpent Valary Jarrett.
There is a 100% chance that she was also looking at other presidential candidates not just Trump. Because who knew Trump was going to be the winner? All of them were spied upon.
ping
And the chances that these zero-ethics, zero-respect-for-law cretins didn’t ALSO spy on the Romney campaign in 2012 are very very very close to zero.
These people full-spectrum weaponized the entire government. There should be thousands of heads on pikes, with all the people who must have participated.
My bet is they were surveilling Trump even before his formal announcement....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.