Ben Rhodes Breaks Silence On Spygate… Looks Very Nervous (VIDEO)

citizenfreepress.com ^ | 4/27/19 | Kane

[a little elbow grease]

It’s not to late for Ben Rhodes to back to grad school and finish that creative writing degree - Dave Burge (Iowahawk) April 30, 2018 ----

__________

see # 18

[poconopundit]

Would love to see the Body Language Ghost analyze this little interview. She’s the one who got 3.6 million hits analyzing Ford accusing Kavanaugh.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uGxr1VQ2dPI

Clearly Rhodes seems nervous, but I’m not a body language expert. I imagine women are much better at this analysis, because she’s so good at reading me when I lie about eating an extra donut :- )

[Ann Archy]

Is that TRUE? Like REALLY TRUE?

[b4me]

self deluded man. we did not wrong. we were perfect, blah, blah. orange man bad. all the while he has an attitude of laughing it off. so why does he sit there for interview if he thinks it such a waste of time?

[jmacusa]

Yeah, I saw that too. A lot of looking away as if trying to run a ‘’program’’ in his ind so he can divert the reporter away from the questions with a question of his own or just some pure bs.. Lot of arms waving about as if he’d wish this guy would go away. The guy clearly knows he’s in trouble and no doubt is thinking he’s going to be made the fall guy.

[AndyJackson]

This asinine smug jerk needs to be hung outside the town gates and lef to rot to encourage the others.

[magua]

The guy asking the questions was not prepared. Anyone that reads Free Republic could’ve asked far better questions. Bad luck to Ben because the walls are closing in on your arrogant attitude.

[KevinB]

If you have the facts on your side, argue the facts. If you have the law on your side, argue the law. If you have neither, pound the table.

[JonPreston]

This will take one indictment, and one flip, to get the ball rolling. Get ready for the biggest show on earth!

[sphinx]

Ben Rhodes' line of defense here is that the Obama White House did not originate the dossier. That is probably technically true. The dossier was paid for by the Clinton campaign and the DNC. It was disseminated throughout government, spread around the Hill and shopped to the media by various means that involved senior Obama appointees in the intelligence community, DOJ, and the FBI. The individuals involved all worked for Obama but not in the White House. Rhodes seems to be insisting that investigators will not find White House fingerprints on any of this. It's too bad the interviewer did not raise Susan Rice's memo to the file where she placed BO in the room, or the Paige-Strzock exchance noting the POTUS wanted to know everything.

So: if Ben wants to insist that Brennan, Clapper, Comey, Lynch, et. al. were all independent actors and that none of them communicated with the White House, and that the White House never communicated with the Clinton campaign or the DNC, and that the White House was unaware of intelligence entanglements with the UK, Australia and perhaps others … well, let's get him under oath testifying to that, and then see what a thorough search of his records might turn up.

[a little elbow grease]

"Is that TRUE? Like REALLY TRUE?"

____________

LOL

Ben like really likes, ......... "literally likes" the word like.

[a little elbow grease]

"'A lot of looking away as if trying to run a ‘’program’’ in his ind so he can divert the reporter away from the questions with a question of his own or just some pure bs.. Lot of arms waving about as if he’d wish this guy would go away. The guy clearly knows he’s in trouble and no doubt is thinking he’s going to be made the fall guy."

___________

.... a very successful interview for Ben.

/s

[a little elbow grease]

"This will take one indictment, and one flip, to get the ball rolling."

___________

[a little elbow grease]

"So: if Ben wants to insist that Brennan, Clapper, Comey, Lynch, et. al. were all independent actors and that none of them communicated with the White House, and that the White House never communicated with the Clinton campaign or the DNC, and that the White House was unaware of intelligence entanglements with the UK, Australia and perhaps others … well, let's get him under oath testifying to that, and then see what a thorough search of his records might turn up."

_________

lol

Very good idea.

[bert]

At least one sealed indictment exists

There are likely several flips

We are waiting for the public announcement

The delay is likely the result of many other cases in process

[JonPreston]

Rhodes is an investigators dream; ask one question and back away while he spills his guts. That’s the first rule of the game. Never, ever do a Hannity.

[gogeo]

I imagine women are much better at this analysis, because she’s so good at reading me when I lie about eating an extra donut :- )

It's the sprinkles on your shirt.

[FreedomPoster]

He hasn’t posted in almost a decade, but custom says you should ping a FReeper when you mention him.

[boycott]

Criticizing Trump for questioning a 2+ year phony investigation that did harm to his presidency? Is this guy a complete idiot?

This coup attempt started under obama. But we’re wrong to look into it? Demos are all evil sleazebags.

[palmer]

So: if Ben wants to insist that Brennan, Clapper, Comey, Lynch, et. al. were all independent actors and that none of them communicated with the White House, and that the White House never communicated with the Clinton campaign or the DNC, and...

"Mistakes were made" "Ben didn't know the Dossier was opposition research" "Ben should have done due diligence" and/or "FBI counterintelligence withheld information and lacked candor"

I see a couple wagons circling and Ben might be close to the wheels. But I doubt Ben Rhodes, the Iran deal liar, is going to go down because he is a potential WH link and will be protected in the end.