Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

One Trump Victory: Companies Rethink China
NY Times ^ | 04-05-2019 | Keith Bradsher

Posted on 04/05/2019 8:22:15 AM PDT by NRx

BEIJING — Whatever deal Washington and Beijing reach over the trade war, President Trump has already scored a big victory: Companies are rethinking their reliance on China.

The two sides are nearing an agreement, with Mr. Trump saying on Thursday that an “epic” trade pact could be weeks away and that he may soon meet with President Xi Jinping, China’s top leader. But already, spurred by tariffs and trade tensions, global companies are beginning to shift their supply chains away from China, just as some Trump administration officials had wanted.

The move, known as decoupling, is a major goal of those who believe the world has grown far too dependent on China as a manufacturing giant. As Beijing builds up its military and extends its geopolitical influence, some officials fear that America’s dependence on Chinese factories makes it strategically vulnerable.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: china; trade
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last
Even the Times is conceding that Trump is on the cusp of a major foreign policy and trade victory.
1 posted on 04/05/2019 8:22:15 AM PDT by NRx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NRx

American business has a very short memory.


2 posted on 04/05/2019 8:25:16 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NRx

Other countries are used to dealing with the USA like it is run by morons.

Now that Trump wants FAIR trade deals they are upset at not being able to take advantage of the USA anymore.


3 posted on 04/05/2019 8:31:10 AM PDT by Mr. K (No consequence of repealing Obamacare is worse than Obamacare itself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

In a way blind greed does indeed make one stupid.


4 posted on 04/05/2019 8:33:55 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

We appeared to have a ‘battered wife syndrome’, or whatever you’d call it. Hopefully no longer.


5 posted on 04/05/2019 8:35:28 AM PDT by PfromHoGro (Orwell was overly optimistic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NRx

Next...decoupling with Mexico. Maybe that’s why Trump gave Mexico a year to stop the drugs. Does he want to give our car parts manufacturers time to get up to speed?


6 posted on 04/05/2019 8:36:01 AM PDT by ryderann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
Other countries are used to dealing with the USA like it is run by morons.

I remember the memorable line in Peter Lynch's book "Beating the Street" where he suggested the principle of investing in companies that any idiot could run because sooner or later some idiot will be.

As I age and grow wiser I think Lynch was way too optimistic.

7 posted on 04/05/2019 8:36:31 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson
You whould be correct in that assumption.
8 posted on 04/05/2019 8:53:07 AM PDT by rdcbn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NRx

Why is it that we had to go from 1992 until 2019 for people to grasp what we were financing in China?

It boggles the mind how poor our assessment is.

Once again, since 1992 I have been saying that China would become exactly what it has become, with our help.

Do we even have a long range planning agency any longer?

I asked the same question after 09/11.


9 posted on 04/05/2019 9:09:27 AM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NRx

Next:

NO Chinese PhD students on PRC scholarships in the sciences at US Universities.

That would be great.


10 posted on 04/05/2019 10:07:53 AM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

Many many science & engineering departments would whine & cry and claim they would have to close down if that happened.


11 posted on 04/05/2019 10:14:14 AM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NRx

ChiComs now have the R&D advantage


12 posted on 04/05/2019 10:18:44 AM PDT by combat_boots (God bless Israel and all who protect and defend her! Merry Christmas! In God We Trust!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reily

I don’t doubt you AT ALL.

And we should face the truth sooner than later, when it’s worse.

Chinese students, often spies, are smart and they are having the effect of papering over the failure of the publeck ejucashun sistum.


13 posted on 04/05/2019 10:19:05 AM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: NRx
The move, known as decoupling, is a major goal of those who believe the world has grown far too dependent on China as a manufacturing giant.

Even the ny slimes gets it right {once in a while}.

WINNING, I AM NOT TIRED OF WINNING!!!

14 posted on 04/05/2019 10:20:10 AM PDT by USS Alaska (Nuke all mooselimb terrorists, today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

“....Other countries are used to dealing with the USA like it is run by morons ...”

One of Trumps 2016 campaign statements was that we have been indeed governed by morons!


15 posted on 04/05/2019 10:23:59 AM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Why is it that we had to go from 1992 until 2019 for people to grasp what we were financing in China?

I think many people did grasp it, but during the Slick Willie years, commercial interests in DC were give decision making authority that had been exercised by the Defense Department before. China was given MFN status during Slick's terms and sponsored for WTO membership. Then China began to work its way into supply chains that even included some US military materiel and equipment.

Commercial interests (globalists) have far too much influence over our government's decisions. I never thought the US should have gone beyond basic diplomatic relations with Red China until it stopped being Red China.

16 posted on 04/05/2019 10:34:46 AM PDT by Will88 (The only people opposing voter ID are those benefiting from voter fraud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots

“ChiComs now have the R&D advantage”

Yep.... they’ve made huge strides in Thorium reactor tech. among other things.


17 posted on 04/05/2019 10:37:02 AM PDT by A Voice (MSM = Enemy of the People)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: NRx

There’s another big reason to decouple; one day the wheels will fall off their Marxist/Fascist economic system. When that day comes the more dependent the world is on China the harder it will hurt everyone.


18 posted on 04/05/2019 10:42:02 AM PDT by jdsteel (Americans are Dreamers too!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NRx

China would never survive without stealing everyone’s stuff and their Leader looks like Yogi Bear so there


19 posted on 04/05/2019 10:45:27 AM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
Other countries are used to dealing with the USA like it is run by morons.

Between January 21, 1988 and January 21, 2017, it pretty much was.

20 posted on 04/05/2019 10:48:57 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (The politicized state destroys all aspects of civil society, human kindness and private charity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson