Posted on 04/04/2019 8:35:22 PM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
The New York Times relied on anonymous, secondhand sources for a Wednesday report pushing the narrative that Attorney General William Barr is mishandling special counsel Robert Mueller’s report on Russian collusion.
The Times’ story Wednesday alleged that members of special counsel Robert Mueller’s team believe that the report is actually much more damaging to President Donald Trump than Barr indicated in his summary of the report’s principal conclusions last weekend.
In making this claim, however, the Times seemingly did not interview anyone from Mueller’s investigatory team who is unhappy. Instead, the Times spoke to “government officials and others familiar” with the team members’ frustrations — all anonymously. None of the sources for the article are further characterized and none were directly quoted for the piece.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
Doesn't matter, the crowd that thinks the Times matters all walk around with one thumb in their mouth sucking their thumb like an infant and the other thumb up their butt. When the NYT blows the whistle, their target audience just swaps thumbs and keeps on sucking.
Misinformation to stir the shxx.
That would be the guy Nicole Wallace left her hubby of 14 years for. Both infected by the Trump Derangement Virus.
Red flags at the NY Times? Send a SWAT team and confiscate their presses!
The Ministry of Propaganda just can’t give up on Russia, Russia, Russia.
I would not be surprised if some of Mueller’s hillary donors want to release stuff that could be used in dnc talking points. But the NYT didn’t even interview the Mueller team.
Hey, both of these are anonymous second hand sources. I guess they have about as much credibility as the NYT. Actually I'd give either of these sources more credibility than the NYT. At least these people genuinely believe what they are saying, aren't knowingly lying.
translation Comey and Brennan are still butthurt
I wouldn’t believe the NY Slimes if they said that Peter Indabutt was a homo.
“This just might be the NYT pushing gossip or lies.”
The Old Gray Prostitute turned into the National Enquirer a long time ago.
“This just might be the NYT pushing gossip or lies.”
The Old Gray Prostitute turned into the National Enquirer a long time ago.
And Samantha Guthrie, lying sack and married to a high level DNC operator, led the Today Show with this smear.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.