Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP triggers 'nuclear option' to speed up Trump picks
The Hill ^ | April 3, 2019 | Jordain Carney

Posted on 04/03/2019 1:15:59 PM PDT by jazusamo

Senate Republicans deployed the “nuclear option” on Wednesday to drastically reduce the amount of time it takes to confirm hundreds of President Trump’s nominees.

Senators voted 51-48 to change the rules for the amount of time it takes to confirm most executive nominations with only a simple majority of the chamber. GOP Sens. Mike Lee (Utah) and Susan Collins (Maine) joined with Democrats in opposing the rules change.

Republicans are expected to trigger the “nuclear option” for a second time later Wednesday to force through the same change for district court nominations.

The combined actions will result in most nominations that require Senate confirmation needing only two hours of debate after they’ve defeated a filibuster that shows they have the votes to ultimately be confirmed. Before Wednesday’s rules change they faced up to an additional 30 hours of debate.

Supreme Court picks, appeals court judges and Cabinet nominees will not be affected by the rules change and will still face the lengthier Senate floor debate.

But the move will let Republicans hit the gas on confirming nominations, a top priority in an era of divided government that has left lawmakers without big-ticket legislative agenda items.

Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) argued shortly before triggering the hardball procedural tactic that the Senate needed to go back to a “more normal and reasonable process” for confirming nominations.

“Our colleagues across the aisle have chosen to endlessly relitigate the 2016 election rather than actually participate in governing,” McConnell added. “This problem goes deeper than today. We’re talking about the future of this very institution and the future functioning of our constitutional government.

Republicans have set a record for the number of appeals judges confirmed during an administration’s first two years, but they’ve accused Democrats of using the chamber’s legislative rulebook to slow down lower-level executive and judicial nominations.

Of 715 “key positions” tracked by The Washington Post and the Partnership for Public Service, 435 have been confirmed by the Senate. An additional 131 are awaiting confirmation, 12 need to be formally nominated and 140 positions still need nominations.

And, according to the same tracker, some departments still have substantial vacancies in their Senate-confirmed positions.

The Interior Department, for example, has 41 percent of its Senate-confirmed employees in place, the Justice Department has 48 percent and the Department of Labor has 50 percent.

It’s the second time Republicans have gone “nuclear” to make it easier to confirm Trump’s nominees in as many years. In 2017, Republicans nixed the 60-vote filibuster on Supreme Court nominees, mirroring the action Democrats took in 2013 on lower-court and executive nominees.

Republicans made a last-ditch effort on Tuesday to pass the rules change as a standing order, which would have required 60 votes. But Democrats and Lee voted against the resolution, preventing it from getting the necessary support to pass.

The resolution was widely expected to fail the earlier test vote but was aimed at assuaging concerns from within the GOP caucus about moving forward with the nuclear option without at least trying to pass it with Democrats. The caucus held a meeting on Tuesday evening to walk through the plan for Wednesday.

“I think we had to convince 51, at least 51, of our members that we’re doing everything possible to try to do this through regular order,” said Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) about the point of Tuesday’s vote.

Republicans say they reached out to try to negotiate an agreement with Democrats to try to reach a deal to avoid Wednesday’s floor drama but found little interest. Sources familiar with the negotiations told The Hill last week that Democrats have tried to negotiate a deal with McConnell, with suggested changes such as postponing the rules change until 2021, applying it only to executive nominees or restoring the “blue slip” for circuit court picks but were unable to reach an agreement.

Democrats are bristling over Republicans decision to invoke the “nuclear option,” arguing that they can’t simultaneously complain about the pace of nominations while setting a record for some court nominees.

A similar resolution passed the Senate in 2013 that cut debate time for most executive nominations to eight hours and district judges to two hours. But that resolution, which passed with bipartisan support, only controlled the 113th Congress.

Democrats argue that the dynamic around nominations has changed dramatically since then. Democrats nixed the 60-vote filibuster in 2013 for most nominations and Republicans followed suite in 2017 on Supreme Court nominations.

Republicans have also moved circuit nominations over the objections of home-state senators.

“The way my colleagues on the other side talk about the issue, you’d think Democrats delayed every nominee for as long as possible. That just doesn’t remotely resemble the truth,” said Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.).


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 116th; braking; constitutionaloption; debatetime; leadermcconnell; nuclearoption; slamdunk; trumpjudges; trumpjudiciary; trumpnominees; ussenate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-127 last
To: Williams

Why use words, when two middle fingers will do just fine?


121 posted on 04/04/2019 10:28:15 PM PDT by SecAmndmt (Arm yourselves!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Given the far Lefts call to destroy this nation by any means necessary, including eliminating the ELECTORAL COLLEGE, lowering the voting age to 16, flooding this nation with “undocumented voters”........and the list goes on.

Harry Reid opened that door, and the GOP is wise enough to create a “red wall” or in this case, I guess the phrase, “Insurance policy” applies.

If the courts are to be “packed” I would much rather the rules be bent in order to pack the courts with Conservatives rather then activists.

122 posted on 04/05/2019 5:47:01 PM PDT by patriot torch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

Support for the Constitution is “partisan.”

Does 10% of our citizens have the slightest idea about the Constitution?

I have been thinking differently about Patronage. It has always been thought bad “to the Victor belong the spoils.”

But it appears that allowing change of personnel with change of administration would impede the creation of the Deep State bureaucracy.

Or powerful bureaucracy may be unavoidable.


123 posted on 04/05/2019 9:28:21 PM PDT by arrogantsob (See "Chaos and Mayhem" at Amazon.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

Romney yes, Lee no....Alice, welcome to Wonderland.


124 posted on 04/07/2019 4:26:00 PM PDT by BigEdLB (BigEdLB, Russian BOT, At your service)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

People can say what they want about McConnell, but he’s done yeoman’s work in getting these nominees through the Senate.


125 posted on 04/08/2019 10:02:48 AM PDT by ScottinVA (The most urgent gathering threat to America: the Democrat Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA

That post is contrary to Free Republic dogmatic doctrine.


126 posted on 04/08/2019 10:05:50 AM PDT by bert ( (KE. NP. N.C. +12) Honduras must be invaded to protect America from invasion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA; bert

Agreed!


127 posted on 04/08/2019 10:23:41 AM PDT by jazusamo (Have You Donated to Keep Free Republic Up and Running?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-127 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson