Posted on 03/10/2019 12:34:21 PM PDT by Kaslin
On this past Friday, the Democrats finally found a way to demonstrate their all out contempt for the sacred process of American elections.
In doing so they closed a circle on a public strategy.
In doing so they telegraphed their future intent.
In doing so Americans face a crossroads.
It was a simple amendment that Republicans wished to add to the Democrats first major attempt at legislation. H.R. 1 attempts to bring about voting reforms that Democrats feel are important. Claiming prejudice, mistreatment, and a need to “open up” elections to a broader swath of voters, Democrats passed a measure that make elections less secure, open to greater fraud and subject less accountability to the integrity of the process.
Let’s be very clear: Democrats don’t want fair elections. They want cover to cheat. They want cover to steal.
Before the vote for final passage however, Republicans used a little tool to give themselves an opportunity to impact the legislation—a motion to recommit. In doing so the GOP sought to add an amendment banning the opportunity for illegal aliens to vote in American elections.
It should have been an easy vote. After all what should Democrats, Republicans, and even the Democratic Socialists in Congress have to lose by insuring that American elections be decided by only—Americans?
Yet the Democrats defeated the measure.
So for the first time, a majority vote was cast, by the majority party in the House of Representatives, to give the power of electoral outcomes into the hands of those who are not citizens.
As reported by the Washington Times the vote was 228-197.
It comes as little surprise to see the Democrats take such action. They have rigorously and consistently fought to make elections more vulnerable.
By openly supporting porous borders they create a flow of potential streams of new voters that seem endless in supply.
By offering freebie entitlement programs they magnetize the earnings of American workers to pay for the vote bribery they seek to entice.
By opposing any form of voter identification (and thus verification of citizenship) they encourage the worst form of corruption to a free society’s most sacred act.
And now, by openly voting in favor of illegal aliens having the “right” to vote in an election for a nation they have no stake in, much less rights to, they are pursuing illegitimate outcomes.
Ironically almost to a person these Congressional Democrats also believe that some Russian placed facebook ads in 2016 caused actual American citizens to hypnotically change their votes in the rust belt. And while they also believe Hillary Clinton did nothing wrong in storing some 2000+ confidential and top-secret emails on a server she may have purchased at Wal-Mart, they claim to believe that Wikileaks somehow releasing those same emails should send the lawfully elected President to prison.
They painfully lack awareness of what secure elections should look like.
They sermonize from the House floor as to why Americans have nothing to worry about. They imply that Americans who use words like “fraud, integrity, fairness and legality” are bigots. They condemn people who seek accountability in how elections are executed. They claim near-civil-rights-era offense when someone mentions identification or verification.
But now they are on the record themselves seeking to supplant American votes with votes of people who have no legal right to be here.
And that friend, sounds to me like, a bonafide national emergency!
Cruz had a lower percent of the Texas vote than ROMNEY did in 2012.
You can’t really use Cruz as a benchmark.
If Cruz had been the national R candidate in 2016, Hillary would be POTUS now.
But it shows what they depend on to win elections - illegals. And other election fraud. Anyone with a couple of brain cells should take note and be concerned, since a lot of election fraud already takes place, including illegals voting, even with this bill which of course will not (at the present time) become law.
Majority of Likely Voters Agree with Trump: ‘We Have People in Congress that Hate Our Country’!
By Craig Bannister | March 8, 2019 | 11:32 AM EST
In its national survey of 1,000 likely voters, conducted March 5-6, Rasmussen asked:
“Do you agree or disagree with the following statement – ‘We have people in Congress, right now that hate our country’?”
While slightly more than half of likely voters agreed with the statement, only about a third disagreed that some members of Congress hate America:
Agree: 51%
Disagree: 34%
Undecided: 14%
Don't worry. Huber talked to Barr, or something. And there is going to be a "BOOM!", I guess. And then "March Madness!" - even though that was supposed to be last year. And then, "PAIN IS COMING!", or so I hear.
Just don't expect arrests or anything.
We’ve known for a long time.. Now we FINALLY have a President to fight for us.
The Dems really don’t have to pass this
legislation, as they’re getting pretty
good at voter fraud. They’ve turned
many seats with vote harvesting, illegals
voting, and magically appearing ballots.
I wonder what percentage of Americans truly understand how they just lost an important right, thanks to the Democrats.
Like it says, cancels votes. Crazy, just crazy.
No outrage, no blowback, not even a harsh reaction.
The dems played Americans masterfully; beat them down to a submissive pulp with outrage fatigue, then move in for the easy kill.
Only way to find out if anyone cares as much as you is to take the first shot....are you willing to lead the way?
I’d wager that if you actually thought about the above, you would know why we don’t rise up....fear of being made an example of as everyone else stands by.
And where o’ where is the Libertarian Champeeen, Rand Paul?
Championing his Libertarian Bullsh*t to the detriment of the country, so he can stroke his own ego. I used to be a fan, no mas.
If he’s such a Libertarian and is also against the National Emergency Declaration, knowing full well that our border is explosive(in more ways than one), he’s a smart guy, so why isn’t he proposing some legislation that takes away the lure for all the illegals?
Why isn’t he proposing legislation to take away Birthright Citizenship....the main reason they all com?
Why isn’t he calling for an end to the refugee programs and the public funds that go to the refugee resettlement companies that get rich bringing 3rd world ugly to the US?
Why isn’t he calling for mandatory EVerify and stiffer penalties for businesses that hire illegals?
Why isn’t he calling for more money to secure the border in an attempt to reduce the drugs pouring into our country? Drugs that have plagued Kentucky and everyplace else?
Does it take shooting to get the point across? Whatever happened to mass protests the Democrats seem to be able to organize? How do they do that? We have to work for a living. At least, I do.
And there you have it - we who wonder why we don't have any real effect in the war for FReedom have more important concerns to take care of....we tell ourselves if a real leader came along we would follow but we will not tale definitive action because it's too inconvenient. I'm not any different than you (except I'm retired and probably a bit older) but was trying to point out why we talk a lot but accomplish so little while the other side goes balls to the wall.
Everyone needs the cheap underpaid leafblowers!!!!!!
Bush League Republicans have been helping.
We got 30 million illegal aliens over 30 years as a bipartisan effort to flood the country with foreigners.
/SARC
:/
It’s only costing US our country..........
All true.
However, Bee Toe?
The (R)'s were content to site back and allow that guy to become their senator?
All true.
However, Bee Toe?
The (R)'s were content to site back and allow that guy to become their senator?
If the (R)'s in Texas disliked him that much, why didn't they nominate someone they liked more?
They darn near shot themselves in the foot by letting Beto "tear down this wall" O'Rourke become their senator.
Either that, or Texas really is on path back to going blue.
No, not saying Robert Francis was a better alternative at all.
I would have voted for Ted.
Some people obviously didn’t.
I will never vote for ineligible Presidential candidates, though.
Lurk....Lurk. I didn't say YOU said/thought Bee Toe was better. But if the Texas (R)'s couldn't find a Senate candidate that they preferred more that Cruz, they darn well should have come out more to vote for him, cause the alternative...
"I will never vote for ineligible Presidential candidates, though."
And neither would I, as I think my record on FR can attest to that bigly, as well as the time and money spent off the keyboard helping to uncover the history and trying to get my elected "officials" and others in positions of power to actually do something beyond folding like a cheap suit.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.