Posted on 03/09/2019 7:17:55 PM PST by Aquamarine
After it claimed no such document existed, the Justice Department just unearthed a letter Matt Whitaker delivered to the Utah U.S. attorney directing a review of how the department handled the Clinton Foundation and the Uranium One issues.
Then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions wrote the letter on Nov. 22, 2017 for Utah U.S. Attorney John Huber. Matt Whitaker, who was Sessions chief of staff at the time, emailed the letter to Huber that day, writing, As we discussed. He also sent Huber a copy of a letter the Justice Departments Congressional affairs chief sent to the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee on Nov. 13 of that year.
The existence of a letter documenting Sessions directive that the DOJ revisit probes of Trumps top political foe is a surprise because a department lawyer said in court last year that senior officials insisted it didnt exist. The liberal nonprofit American Oversight obtained the letter through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request they filed on Nov. 22, 2017the same day Whitaker emailed Sessions letter to Huber.....
(Excerpt) Read more at thedailybeast.com ...
A LETTER directing Huber to look into it is not the same as Huber actually looking into it.
No leaks could simply mean there was nothing to leak because nothing has been happening, ergo, nothing to leak.
This is jibberish.
By Debra Heine August 30, 2018
Lots can happen in six months, wouldn't you agree? Even if Toensig was trying to keep her whistle-blower client alive by not giving him up.
Remember, snitches get stitches and wind up in ditches, in Hillary land.
You make an excellent argument.
Were you on the debate team?
Looks like he talked to somebody.
A debriefing is an interview, isn't it?
The article implies it is. She says he was interviewed.
Perhaps he wasn't needed to say anything more to Huber
as his evidence and prior interviews spoke loudly enough?
I read the article...
(excerpt)
Obviously the House did talk to Ohr.
Read the article again and maybe you'll understand it.
A LETTER directing Huber to look into it is not the same as Huber actually looking into it.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
You BELIEVING Huber isn’t doing anything isn’t the same as Huber isn’t doing anything...
ironic huh?
-
Yes, the person that went undercover has Cancer, and the Obama Appointee from the land of Glenn Beck / Romney financing must think its contagious.
Huber, the Fraud, has done nothing.
Ask Manafort and Papadopoulos.
Ask Flynn. Ask Roger Stone.
Ask CNN if they were invited to any 4:00 am raids of the Clinton Foundation.
Why were at it, where are the indictments of McCabe, Comey, Simpson, Yates, and Strzok?
There is a pattern here.
Hubers DoJ donated heavily to Hillary Clinton for President
.
That's true, actually.
By that same token, just because the sun came up yesterday, doesn't guarantee it'll come up tomorrow.
So your conspiracy theory then is that Huber, having been specially appointed and directed by the Attorney General to investigate certain specific and "other" matters, refused.
Is that your position?
Of course, you BELIEVING Huber IS doing something isnt the same as Huber actually doing something...
.
The hyper technical arguments are troll stuff.
Toensing has said many times in the last 90 days that Huber has done nothing, that its a sham Op.
The number of backstabbers, insubordinate aholes and outright traitors that managed to infect the Trump administration is mind boggling. From his white house counsel to his AG... It’s a g-damn greek tragedy.
You're still not following the conversation. It wasn't my article, two other posters were talking about it.
Lots can happen in six months, wouldn't you agree? Even if Toensig was trying to keep her whistle-blower client alive by not giving him up.
Hey anything is possible, but I doubt it.
And the identity of Tonsing's whistle-blower was long ago given up. I believe in was back in November of 2016.
That's the most likely scenario, given the facts.
To believe otherwise is to be a conspiracy theorist.
How many criminal referrals has Congress made to DOJ that just disappeared into the mists? Lots.
The House has voted to hold AG Holder in contempt of Congress over his failure to turn over documents related to the Fast and Furious scandal, the first time in the nation’s history that Congress made such move against a sitting Cabinet official. What happened? Nothing.
Directives from the President to declassify information were ignored.
Nobody in Washington is held to account for disobeying orders from another branch or even from your boss.
Washington DC is not like the rest of the world where you get fired for such insubordination.
So, is it likely or even probably Huber ignored his directive? Of course it it.
Three debriefings of William Campbell in 2015.
Note her own statement as well therein.
Somebody fed you some BS.
I was.
Very successful at it.
Has she? Really?
And if so, does she have reason to not "give up" her "rat" client?
Think about it. No really, THINK about it.
Quoting the other article nice try
“Department of Justice official Bruce Ohr has not been contacted by special counsel Robert Mueller or U.S. Attorney John Huber for interviews.”
So tell us genius, what is rule 804b regarding previous testimony especially testimony before congress?
You want to take a stab at what rule 804b is regarding previous testimony?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.