Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

RESIST: Oh, So This Is How New Jersey Is Going To Keep Trump Off The Ballot In 2020...
Townhall ^ | February 22, 2019

Posted on 02/22/2019 6:22:44 AM PST by SMGFan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last
To: ObozoMustGo2012
[But who cares? There’s no way NJ elects Trump so this has just been an effing waste of taxpayer money.]

As a NJ resident, I care.

If Trump is not on the ballot, then whatever Repubs that are left won’t bother voting at all, guaranteeing all down-ballot races to be at risk for Democrats to win, including reliability consistant Republican cities and townships.

If Bernie or Howard Schultz (or both) run as third-party candidates, Trump could win with more electoral votes and fewer popular votes than last time.

But, no, this is clearly unconstitutional. It my not even pass muster under the New Jersey constitution. All this is is another stupid, meaningless NeverTrump gesture.

21 posted on 02/22/2019 7:06:32 AM PST by Sooth2222 ("Every nation gets the government it deserves." -Joseph de Maistre)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

Agreed, but New Jersey should show proof that the previous Presidential candidate (Soetoro) was really 35 years old and an NBC....with verifiable documents.


22 posted on 02/22/2019 7:08:23 AM PST by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

When will this state FINALLY burn to the ground!


23 posted on 02/22/2019 7:12:38 AM PST by The Toll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trebb

“Gonna be interesting to see them Dem tax returns....”

Exactly! This bill will not pass because there is no way the Democrat candidates are going to release their tax returns for the last five years. They seem to think that this knife doesn’t cut both ways.


24 posted on 02/22/2019 7:17:21 AM PST by TIElniff (Autonomy is the guise of every graceless heart.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

That’s nice - they cannot do so. Only the Constitution sets the requirements !


25 posted on 02/22/2019 7:40:45 AM PST by Pikachu_Dad ("the media are selling you a line of soap)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

NJ politicians need to be held to this standard now, even if it doesn’t survive. That gang of corrupt thieves all have unexplainable income, you can bet on that. If Trump can’t run in NJ without releasing his returns, nobody else can at any level.


26 posted on 02/22/2019 7:50:56 AM PST by pepsi_junkie (Often wrong, but never in doubt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan
Pulling one candidate off the ballots in selected states so one candidate is getting votes in 50 states and the other in 49 or 48 or 47. Then saying whoever gets the most votes nationwide automatically wins thos other states regardless of the votes in them.

This is truly one step away from just eliminating elections. Suppressing votes by legal fiat, then not even worrying about what the votes actually say, just awarding the prize based on some criteria.

People said we were nuts when we said democrats were just america hating communists hidden behind spin tested lies. Then Black Lives Matters and the rise of things like Green New Deal made it obvious we were 100% right all along. They want to deal death and destruction to their enemies, end elections and crush us all under an iron boot. Say I'm crazy for saying that now, but in time if they get the opportunity it will happen.

27 posted on 02/22/2019 7:57:53 AM PST by pepsi_junkie (Often wrong, but never in doubt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

“meanwhile Blue states trying to control Electoral College by planning to award EV to candidate winning nationwide popular vote.”

Could you provide a link or two?

That seems insane, because (just for instance) Trump might win the popular vote in 2020. Such an approach would make landslides much more likely...


28 posted on 02/22/2019 7:59:35 AM PST by PreciousLiberty (Make America Greater Than Ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PreciousLiberty

https://www.nationalpopularvote.com/written-explanation


29 posted on 02/22/2019 8:01:48 AM PST by SMGFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

Can anyone point out where disclosure of tax returns is an eligibility requirement to run for President?

“No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty-five years, and been fourteen years a resident...”


30 posted on 02/22/2019 8:04:37 AM PST by Sasparilla ( I'm Not Tired of Winning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

The state will so very much be sued back to the stone age.


31 posted on 02/22/2019 8:37:48 AM PST by USCG SimTech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sasparilla

As I read this part, it seems that the phrases “natural born citizen” and “citizen of the United States” only refer to those persons alive at the time of the adoption of the Constitution. They’re all dead now, so all bets are off.


32 posted on 02/22/2019 8:45:10 AM PST by catman67 (14 gauge?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan
If Trump is not on the ballot in NJ, that reduces his national total of popular votes...possibly leading to a repeat of 2016 where he won a majority of the electoral votes but Hillary had more popular votes (but not a majority).

In 1968 the Peace and Freedom Party candidate for President was less than 35 years old. In California his name did not appear on the ballot, only the name of the vice-presidential candidate. Of course that did not affect the outcome of the election.

Could the Republican Party have a line on the ballot with "unpledged electors"? Some Southern states had unpledged electors on the ballot in 1960.

33 posted on 02/22/2019 9:00:07 AM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino
They cannot place additional qualifications beyond the Constitutional requirements.

They can't even enforce the Constitutional ones.

34 posted on 02/22/2019 9:36:21 AM PST by itsahoot (Welcome to the New USA where Islam is a religion of peace and Christianity is a mental disorder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

Yep, The law is toast before the ink is dry...


35 posted on 02/22/2019 9:39:18 AM PST by phs3 (MAGA - Winning a little more every day!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Pikachu_Dad
Only the Constitution sets the requirements !

Actually the Constitution defines who is eligible but it also says the State picks the electors any way they see fit. That is what some states are winner take all and others are apportioned.

36 posted on 02/22/2019 9:41:43 AM PST by itsahoot (Welcome to the New USA where Islam is a religion of peace and Christianity is a mental disorder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

Trump should release the three years that he has been President. Gave away almost all his salary and had already divested himself of his businesses.


37 posted on 02/22/2019 10:25:30 AM PST by Revolutionary ("Praise the Lord and Pass the Ammunition!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TangledUpInBlue

“It’s gonna pass. But who cares? There’s no way NJ elects Trump so this has just been an effing waste of taxpayer money.”

Darn it all, I was so sure that NJ would go for President Trump in 2020.


38 posted on 02/22/2019 10:53:25 AM PST by BatGuano
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

Of course it is unconstitutional. Does that matter to NJ dems or nationwide idiots that have never read the document? No.


39 posted on 02/22/2019 10:56:09 AM PST by BatGuano
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TangledUpInBlue

There is a forgotten fact. When the Constitution was written, there was no income tax, therefore no tax returns. The Founders avoided that as they avoided slavery. Thanks to the “Progs.” the Sixteenth Amendment nailed us to our fate.


40 posted on 02/22/2019 11:02:51 AM PST by BatGuano
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson