Posted on 02/05/2019 2:40:14 AM PST by RoosterRedux
While Democrats may not be happy with Northam for dragging out the inevitable and hurting their brand in the meantime, the uproar over Northam’s past succeeded in diverting attention from media’s focus on the party’s extreme abortion position.
Yet, even without the straight-talking Northam to expose the barbarity of late-term abortions, the extreme laws the Democratic Party supports remain unchanged. And those laws are even more horrific than even Northam’s comments revealed.
Those comments came last week in a radio interview, when Northam was asked whether he supported state Del. Kathy Tran’s late-term abortion bill, which, as Tran acknowledged during committee debate, would allow an abortion at full-term even if the mother had already started labor.
Northam told the radio host: “If a mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen. The infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother.”
The sub-committee tabled Tran’s bill. But many fail to realize that Northam’s statement that “the infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired” applies equally to Virginia’s current abortion law. Under both current law and Tran’s proposed amendment, following an abortion, if there is “any clearly visible evidence of viability,” the abortionist must provide “life support.”
(Excerpt) Read more at thefederalist.com ...
Dems are the party of the KKK and abortion. They have hiden their racist nature. Most abortions are Black babies.
The very people the blacks are surgically attached to are the very people who are their enemies. Why cant they see this?
There is another class of coloured people who make a business of keeping the troubles, the wrongs, and the hardships of the Negro race before the public. Having learned that they are able to make a living out of their troubles, they have grown into the settled habit of advertising their wrongs — partly because they want sympathy and partly because it pays. Some of these people do not want the Negro to lose his grievances, because they do not want to lose their jobs.
You better believe that the Democrats will do and say anything to stop the truth from getting out. That the Demon Rats want infanticide of children of American Citizens is a well known fact. They want to insure that the Criminal, Illegal Alien Terrorists population grows and that they will vote Democrat (ILLEGALLY, AND WITH DEMOCRATS HELP AND SUPPORT) and with the help and blessing of the DemonRatic Party. Has ONE DEMOCRAT SAY ANYTHING THAT THIS IS WRONG. I DOUBT IT. They are so immersed in their lust for power and control. That these sick, perverted, demented POS’s don’t care what they do!!!!!
The Democratic party is anti-white. So, there you go.
Those two policicies are historically united under Margaret Sanger. Instead.. post Sangersxwords everywhere you see either of these articles. Sanger’s eugenics creed is clearly stated in her speech My Way to Peace” (1932).
Well stated!
His graphic and clinical description of killing babies has been replaced by his graphic and comical description of life as coonman.
I think we can handle both vociferously calling for an end to infanticide and the removal of Northam.
“Look! Squirrel!” With attention thus diverted, the truly obscene and racist actions of the enablers of the agenda in Virginia may yet be able to slip this beneath the scrutiny of the public, as it is certainly well below the scrutiny of most of the mainstream media.
Ralph Northam may well be able to dance and artfully dodge the question of his history of racism, innocuous though it may have been. If he steps aside, the duties of governor will fall to the lieutenant governor, who has some questionable skeletons in his own closet. But all the time, it is to protect the previously concealed agenda of abortion on demand up to the point of infanticide.
Who was the yearbook editor? I think that person holds the answers. I never approved a yearbook page. I thought that was usually done by a team of editors. Maybe those guys have a checkered pants past.
All the fuss is not over a picture. It’s generated to distract from the revelation of the truth that democrats want baby killing at any time, even after birth. The media initially did all it could to hide that fact. It wasn’t enough, so they seized on the picture and turned it into one of their monthly obsessions.
Killing live babies = OK
Dressing in blackface = worse than Hitler.
Democrats are baby killers. Go read their party platform.
JoMa
I don’t care about his ‘racism’. OTOH his abortion stance is despicable.
Republicans and conservatives won't adopt that strategy though, despite being beat over the head with similar strategies in the past.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.