[Boomer]

It was Pelosi’s job to vette obama and she is now speaker again so it will be her job to vette this witch.

[research99]

"It was Pelosi’s job to vette obama and she is now speaker again so it will be her job to vette this witch.

The difference is, this time we will have the documents.

[Electric Graffiti]

“It was Pelosi’s job to vette obama and she is now speaker again so it will be her job to vette this witch.”

Good point. Kamala is good to go.

[bert]

Actually, it was the Democrat convention’s job of to vette the candidates.

Pelosi did not vette, she certified the results of the nominating comittee as to who was nomiated.

I have the letter Pelosi sent to the Tennessee Elections Comission telling them who was the Democratic nominee

[poconopundit]

I’m glad this issue is being brought out, and the issue will probably not be resolved or 2020.

However, the controversy about this will cause any candidate who doesn’t meet the requirement to lose votes and take a lot of public criticism.

I welcome that, and it would a dream to see Harris get the nomination. I think she’s a long shot for the nomination, but Trump would easily dispose of this arrogant Leftist.

[Drew68]

It was Pelosi’s job to vette obama and she is now speaker again so it will be her job to vette this witch.

Where in the Constitution is the Speaker of the House designated the task of vetting presidential candidates?