Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ginsburg Missing Supreme Court Arguments for 1st Time
NYT ^ | 7 January 2019 | AP via NYT

Posted on 01/07/2019 6:38:29 AM PST by NautiNurse

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 201-216 next last
To: allendale
Chuck Schumer is not having a good day.

Yeah - and I'll smile for hours at that thought.

121 posted on 01/07/2019 9:48:52 AM PST by Charles Martel (Progressives are the crab grass in the lawn of life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jpsb
Who ever Trump nominates better have thin skin, the battle over Ruth’s seat will be epic and might even be bloody.

They knew that Roberts would go squishy on any case important to the Left, and vote with the leftist justices, and yet still opposed Kavanaugh with everything they could do.

A replacement which would ACTUALLY shift the Court to conservative? They will go insane.

122 posted on 01/07/2019 9:48:57 AM PST by PapaBear3625 ("Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." -- Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse
Hiya jpsb! Happy New Year!

Thanks Nauti, and back at ya. :)

123 posted on 01/07/2019 9:50:09 AM PST by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625
They are NOT going to persecute a woman.....particulary since the Senate has the majority.

In fact, the Dems might just play ka with Barrett.

124 posted on 01/07/2019 9:55:55 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
They tried their best at Barrett's confirmation hearings. While it was ugly to watch them go after her for being a believing Catholic, it was no where near as ugly as the smear job they pulled on Kavenough(sp).

It appears the Dem's game plan is to make confirmation hearings so ugly no decent person would willingly put themselves thru that process.

125 posted on 01/07/2019 9:57:29 AM PST by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse

I wouldn’t be surprised to see the news outlets confused the date the docs discovered her tumors and the date they did the surgery.

Probably at least a week between the 2 dates given the vagaries of scheduling major surgery around the holiday season....even for someone as important to keep alive as a SCOTUS justice.

Probably had to cancel several planned vacations to get her surgery scheduled.....not to mention prepping and clearing an elderly person for such an invasive procedure.


126 posted on 01/07/2019 9:57:31 AM PST by TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig (We need a consent decree for the FBI like Obama was slapping on all those police agencies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Old Retired Army Guy

Yes.

Rehnquist ruled and wrote majority opinions on cases he did not personally hear.

There is no rule preventing Kavanaugh from doing the same, even though he wasn’t on the Court. But it’s not likely to happen, as there is an option of simply rehearing the case with Kavanaugh present. The USSC generally doesn’t like to do things without precedent.


127 posted on 01/07/2019 9:58:37 AM PST by jjotto (Next week, BOOM!, for sure!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: jjotto

would be nice to know what drugs she takes while she’s working on cases.


128 posted on 01/07/2019 9:59:12 AM PST by morphing libertarian (Use Comey's Report; Indict Hillary now; build Kate's wall. --- Proud Smelly Walmart Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse

Ruth, Ruth. Its time to wake up honey. You have to go take your seat for the oral arguments. That’s right dear, put your robe on. Where’s your walker. You can take a nap after you get back.


129 posted on 01/07/2019 9:59:42 AM PST by Opinionated Blowhard (When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
They are NOT going to persecute a woman.....particulary since the Senate has the majority.

And yet they did not hesitate to put a black man, Clarence Thomas, through hell.

They had no problems with harassing Sarah Sanders, and Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen. Earlier, they had no problems going after Sarah Palin.

Do not underestimate what they are capable of doing. I expect Amy's family will be put through hell, with daily death threats against her kids.

130 posted on 01/07/2019 10:01:01 AM PST by PapaBear3625 ("Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." -- Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse

First time?

IMO, RBG has never NOT “missed” the point of any legal argument ever set before her. A bag of hammers has more clear understanding of the Constitution.


131 posted on 01/07/2019 10:02:46 AM PST by JME_FAN (If you lived here, you'd be home by now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pfflier

I don’t think she knows that she’s there even when she is there.


132 posted on 01/07/2019 10:03:16 AM PST by b4its2late (A Liberal is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse

She shouldn’t get to vote if she doesn’t hear the arguments. Imagine if one of the conservative justices did that!


133 posted on 01/07/2019 10:04:55 AM PST by CottonBall (We are not represented, we are ruled.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aMorePerfectUnion

Let the riots begin - I have lots of ammo, and could use more practice on moving targets.


134 posted on 01/07/2019 10:05:33 AM PST by JME_FAN (If you lived here, you'd be home by now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse

Ruthie definitely has a problem. Two malignant lesions in a lung after prior colon and pancreatic cancers suggests metastatic disease. This lung cancer is certainly locally metastatic.

Her doctor’s should know more about her prognosis based upon histology/biomarker testing of these new lesions. Of course, this type of information will be kept from the public. However, they cannot hide her missing work.

Many unknowns, hoping for the best, but this is likely a poor outcome for Ruthie...


135 posted on 01/07/2019 10:06:08 AM PST by MCEscherHammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cowboy Bob

That’s a story going around.....that she dead. I couldn’t find anything on it, so I’m sure it’s fake...BUT, she’ll still vote. All dead democrats still vote, ya know.


136 posted on 01/07/2019 10:07:20 AM PST by TribalPrincess2U (0bama's agenda�Divide and conquer seems to be working.?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: elcid1970

If the Dems turn the House into Romper Room filled with dung flinging psychotic chimps, fine.


Don’t you go degrading dung flinging psychotic chimps. I’d rather one of these than McCain.


137 posted on 01/07/2019 10:10:55 AM PST by Hieronymus ((It is terrible to contemplate how few politicians are hanged. --G. K. Chesterton))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: CottonBall
She has access to every bit of the procedures. She is just not participating....which to me means....she is hooked up to a respirator to help her with her breathing.

I believe she is dying....Don't see much on the family.

138 posted on 01/07/2019 10:11:05 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
Amy will be a hard target, being a mom and all. She her resume' is untouchable.

Barrett graduated from St. Mary's Dominican High School in New Orleans in 1990. In 1994, Barrett graduated magna cum laude with a Bachelor of Arts in English literature from Rhodes College, where she was a Phi Beta Kappa member.] In 1997, she graduated summa cum laude from the Notre Dame Law School with a Juris Doctor, where she was executive editor of the Notre Dame Law Review.

After graduation, Barrett served as a law clerk to Judge Laurence Silberman of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. She then spent a year as a clerk to Associate Justice Antonin Scalia of the Supreme Court of the United States from 1998–99.

She was a member of the Federalist Society from 2005 to 2006 and 2014 to 2017.Barrett continues to teach as a sitting judge.

139 posted on 01/07/2019 10:12:40 AM PST by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse

“At best, there are 52. Romney has made his anti-Trump intentions crystal clear.”

Not even 50. Romney, Murkowski and Collins. We can lose those 3 and Pence breaks tie. That why FLA was so important. Especially since the Rats were allowed to steal the AZ and Montana Senate races.


140 posted on 01/07/2019 10:16:08 AM PST by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 201-216 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson