Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/10/2018 9:05:26 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last
To: SeekAndFind
Here's the bottom line:

The Russia Probe Becomes a Banal Sex Scandal


2 posted on 12/10/2018 9:06:12 AM PST by SeekAndFind (look at Michigan, it will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Meanwhile, the Clintons continue to walk free for decades of horrendous crimes.


4 posted on 12/10/2018 9:13:53 AM PST by Old Yeller (Auto-correct has become my worst enema.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

More lies & distortion of the truth by The Shadow Government .....the one, we ‘little people’ are all expected to ignore as a non-existent fantasy of ‘conspiracy theorists’.

The vast Shadow Government has yet to ceed power to the duly elected President of the United States,....

......Daily, the BS CIA MSM floods the American People with BSCIA Operation Mockingbird disinformation. Blatantly, propagandizing the dumbed-down population in their seditious war against Constitutionally vested authority....

....The CIA has installed Presidents all over the world,......this time, we elected one of our own.

And, they have broken many federal statutes to reverse the expressed will of the People.


5 posted on 12/10/2018 9:17:50 AM PST by Trump_vs_Evil_Witch (Meuller, Rosenstein,....co-conspirators to Obstruct Justice over Uranium One)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Attempts to “impeach 45” shall turn out to be exercises in futility. It ain’t going ANYWHERE, folks. Oh, the Democrat majority in the House, under Nancy Pelosi, might have a piece of paper, but unless it is soft and absorbent, not much they can do with it.

This could turn out to be FUN for Team Trump, throwing back the charges at the instigators in the various House committees that seem to think, “Oh, boy, we got him NOW!”

They been saying that since sometime in 2015, when Trump rode down the escalator and made his public announcement.

Reports of the imminent demise of Donald J. Trump are greatly exaggerated.


7 posted on 12/10/2018 9:20:04 AM PST by alloysteel (Man does not live by bread alone. He needs chocolate cake too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

According to Kim Clement, he will NOT be impeached. If he is, then Clement was a false prophet.


8 posted on 12/10/2018 9:20:31 AM PST by Dogbert41 (When the strong man, fully armed, guards his own dwelling, his goods are safe. -Luke 11:21)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

If candidate Trump used his own money to pay off these scumbag broads, there is no violation.

And the president denies having sex with either one of these two sluts.


10 posted on 12/10/2018 9:22:27 AM PST by july4thfreedomfoundation (Hey liberals! Trump in 2020. Because, 'eff you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

on what grounds?


11 posted on 12/10/2018 9:23:10 AM PST by Chickensoup (Never count on anyone, ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Actually they will need 20 Republican senators to vote to convict, won't they?

The Democrats seem to think that the impeachment process and the media publicity will damage Trump so much that he will be easy to beat in 2020. They probably don't really expect to be able to remove him from office or get him to resign.

At least that may make it less likely they will try assassination--thinking that it would be easier to defeat Trump in 2020 than to face Pence.

12 posted on 12/10/2018 9:23:46 AM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
IMO, most likely impeached by a Rat House, but not convicted by the R Senate.

The real damage: the 24/7 impeachment circus filled with all manner of outrageous, unsupported allegations of every foul deed known to man which continues right up to the eve on the 2020 R primaries...designed solely to support Trump's competition in those primaries.

13 posted on 12/10/2018 9:23:52 AM PST by frog in a pot (Result of many state bailouts? Taxpayers elsewhere in America get to finance the Left's growth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

More of the usual scat from Rick Moron


17 posted on 12/10/2018 9:26:03 AM PST by Dartoid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Everyone calling this out is complicit in their OWN indescretions
19 posted on 12/10/2018 9:27:49 AM PST by knarf (I say things that are true; I have no proof .... but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

If the Democrats and never Trumper Republicans get their way and impeach him, this Republic is DEAD!


21 posted on 12/10/2018 9:28:17 AM PST by antidemoncrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

The democrats view impeaching Trump as just another strategy to weaken him so they can regain power. And it is throwing red meat to the MSM.


27 posted on 12/10/2018 9:32:34 AM PST by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

The democrats won’t wait for an indictment to try to impeach Trump. To them, it would be just icing on the cake.


28 posted on 12/10/2018 9:33:43 AM PST by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

30 posted on 12/10/2018 9:35:15 AM PST by red-dawg (Climate change caused the end of the Ice Age. Did man play a part in it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
the payments to the women were made “in coordination with and at the direction of” the candidate for federal office – Donald Trump.

All perfectly legal, as long as Trump

1. Paid off said women with his own money, (He did).
2. Would have paid off said women whether he was running for president or not. Trump, a married man, would have paid off any women he may or may not have had a liaison with, to prevent such info from reaching hie wife.

31 posted on 12/10/2018 9:37:40 AM PST by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind; All
The key to the whole thing that McCarthy ignored in his article is whether the two expenditures actually were campaign expenditures as defined by the statute. Most important, the statute and regulations exempt "personal expenditures" from reporting and generally define them as expenditures a candidate makes to cover non-campaign debts. Those debts definitely can include hush money payments to inconvenient former paramours or wannabe paramours. Indeed, if a campaign even makes such payments with the candidate's knowledge, that candidate can be prosecuted for making illegal personal expenditures from his campaign, as happened with the late Bill Scott, a former IL governor.

Thus, if PDJT had reported the two settlements as campaign expenditures, he'd have immediately admitted committing two felonies, for which he could be impeached, convicted, and prosecuted. By making those expenditures entirely from his personal funds he actually avoided committing campaign finance violations. IOW he is now being attacked for doing his best to comply with, and complying with, campaign finance law.

32 posted on 12/10/2018 9:39:42 AM PST by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

The goal is not impeachment,which the libs know is a non starter,the goal is to overwhelm America with bullshit aimed towards the 2020 election


33 posted on 12/10/2018 9:39:54 AM PST by Paddyboy (Roma Omnia Vincit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind; 1_Rain_Drop; 3D-JOY; Abbeville Conservative; Abby4116; acoulterfan; aft_lizard; ...

You can’t indict a sitting president. This has been established now, twice. They can call him an “unindicted co-conspirator,” or whatever, but all they can do is use this to try to impeach him.

The 40-seat advantage in the House means impeachment is likely. Had it just been 4-5 seats, pressure on some of the red-state Ds would be too powerful. But Botoxic will “release” enough of them to maintain the margin to impeach and still let them out of it.

So, the senate. I count about 39 pretty strong Trump votes. I count another 7 who are squishes, who could go either way. There are about 7 I think will vote for removal, including Minion, Burrito, Mel Tillis, MurCowSki, Tom Collins, and perhaps two others.

In other words, McConnell would likely have enough votes for an immediate “dismissal” on no grounds rather than a trial.

The election of Braun, Hawley, Scott, Blackburn, and Cramer are going to prove absolutely KEY to keeping Trump. Honestly, I don’t think Heller or McSally would help us. I would not be sure either would be a full Trump supporter. Rosendale would have and Renacci would have. But we should have more than enough.


34 posted on 12/10/2018 9:47:20 AM PST by LS ("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

I do not believe the Dems are so stupid as to vote impeach DJT. Yes, some of them will, but they don’t have a big enough margin of safe seats to pull this off. And they don’t have the votes in the Senate. And they know this.

They are hoping to dirty him up, cause him to throw in the towel. He is losing $$ every day he is in office.

My gut tells me he is going to tell him to F themselves.

:)


37 posted on 12/10/2018 9:54:03 AM PST by Dana1960
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson