Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump shrugs off future debt crisis: ‘I won’t be here’
Washington Examiner ^ | December 05, 2018 02:28 PM | Caitlin Yilek

Posted on 12/05/2018 8:09:09 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum

President Trump is dismissing the importance of paying down the national debt, saying he won’t be in office to take blame for the nation's fiscal crisis when it becomes even more unsustainable, according to a report Wednesday.

The national debt sits at $21 trillion and counting. As a candidate, when the national debt was $19 trillion, Trump promised to erase the entire debt “over a period of eight years.”

Senior administration officials showed Trump charts and graphics in early 2017 that illustrated a “hockey stick” spike in the debt in the coming years. Trump said the data showed the national debt would only become untenable after he left office, the Daily Beast reported.

“Yeah, but I won’t be here,” Trump said.

People close to the president told the news outlet that the national debt never actually bothered Trump, despite his public comments about it.

“I never once heard him talk about the debt,” one former White House official said.

White House spokesman Hogan Gidley said it’s also the responsibility of Congress to cut back on spending.

“While the president has and will continue to do everything in his power to rein in Washington’s out-of-control spending, the Constitution gives Congress the power of the purse, and it’s time for them to work with this president to reduce the debt,” he said.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 115th; debt; trumpbudget
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-130 next last
To: NELSON111
Trump was either lying or extremely naive himself if he thought for a second we would erase the deficit during 8 years of his presidency without radical government cuts

Wait let me get this straight, you think the govt is going to CUT spending but holding spending at a fixed baseline is impossible. You are the nut.

101 posted on 12/06/2018 5:48:21 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Crucial

Raising IMPORT tariffs will reduce the budget and protect US workers. win - win.


102 posted on 12/06/2018 5:49:20 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
you think a President can solve the entitlement/transfer payment (AKA debt) problem all by himself?

Well, gee..., his campaign promise in 2016 was that he would eliminate the national debt in 8 years. Now, his position is "screw it, let's just keep running trillion dollar deficits every year to infinity. I won't be here when it blows up".

Somewhere between those is a middle ground I could live with.

103 posted on 12/06/2018 5:50:08 AM PST by Poison Pill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

It’s actually worse than that. Under our current Fiat Currency system, All Monies are Loaned into Society with Interest attached. Only the Principle is created by the magic money machine, NOT the Interest. In other words, if you wrote a check today to Pay off the National Debt, it would consume every last Federal Reserve Note and Credit, but the Interest would still be Due and Payable to the Bankers. Interest can only be paid through the blood and sweat of Labor.

I know, Math is Hard.


104 posted on 12/06/2018 5:51:19 AM PST by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Reading comprehension problems? Lol! I didn’t say that. I don’t believe (nor did I say) it will happen either. It won’t. He was either lying or naive because he thought we could strictly grow our way out of it. We can’t and we won’t. There is zero way the government is going to be stagnant for 20 years and it’s not going to cut spending. So, please learn to read what people are ACTUALLY saying and not what you infer. Trumps thoughts or possible thoughts are not my thoughts. They are my thoughts on HIS thoughts. They are two different things. It’s not that hard.


105 posted on 12/06/2018 6:11:40 AM PST by NELSON111 (Congress: The Ralph Wolf and Sam Sheepdog show. Theater for sheep. My politics determines my "hero")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: NELSON111
We can’t and we won’t.

We could and we should. It would take 50 years but it could be done.

106 posted on 12/06/2018 6:15:25 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: central_va
Wait let me get this straight, you think the govt is going to CUT spending but holding spending at a fixed baseline is impossible. You are the nut.

Anyone who thinks either is politically possible is nuts.

107 posted on 12/06/2018 6:16:18 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I think what he means is he can’t do a thing about it. Trump submitted a budget that cuts spending by $58 billion and Congress rejected it.


108 posted on 12/06/2018 6:27:00 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
It would be nice to reduce government spending. It isn’t going to happen.

And that is why these United States of America will not celebrate a Tricentennial.

109 posted on 12/06/2018 6:35:46 AM PST by NorthMountain (... the right of the peopIe to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Disturbing, but essentially true.

The entire world economy is dependent on our printing presses and continuing to pretend that the dollar has value.

Since nobody can bear the thought of the alternative, I believe they can keep this game of Three Card Monte going long past the end of any of our lifetimes.


110 posted on 12/06/2018 6:41:16 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2
Trump submitted a budget that cuts spending by $58 billion and Congress rejected it.

...and then he signed the budget they gave him.

111 posted on 12/06/2018 6:42:40 AM PST by Poison Pill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Poison Pill

Yeh because Trump has realized both parties want spend and they won’t be thwarted.


112 posted on 12/06/2018 6:44:51 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2
Trump has realized both parties want spend and they won’t be thwarted.

A veto does the trick.

113 posted on 12/06/2018 6:49:47 AM PST by Poison Pill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

President Trump is dismissing the importance of paying down the national debt,

Paying down the debt? You mean the 21 TRILLION and climbing daily debt that the United States has? Since when did the media or ANY politician give a rats ass about paying down the debt? Our debt is never going to be paid down. Just paying the interest is more then we can do! Seriously. Just say you hate Trump and leave it at that Stop with the phony baloney attempts to provide reasons!


114 posted on 12/06/2018 6:55:24 AM PST by 48th SPS Crusader (I am an American. Not a Republican or a Democrat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 48th SPS Crusader

70% of federal expenditures are entitlements/transfer payments.

As soon as those checks stop, all Hell breaks loose.

FDR gave us social security. He started this mess. On purpose.


115 posted on 12/06/2018 6:58:28 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Democracy dies when Democrats refuse to accept the result of a democratic election they didn't win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I’m all for reducing entitlements. I’ve paid into social security for 40 years now. If they cut me a check for what I’ve paid in through the years, including interest first, then I’d vote to do away with it.


116 posted on 12/06/2018 7:03:34 AM PST by marajade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Inflicting pain on people for the sake of a long term goal is stupid. If anything, the Democrats intend to do the opposite.

Our president is AWESOME.

I was watching the funeral for Grabby Poppy yesterday with some Democrat friends.

I remarked that I had voted for Ross Perot, the first time, when I was young and didn't understand that government deficits didn't mean an effing thing.

117 posted on 12/06/2018 7:19:31 AM PST by kiryandil (Never pick a fight with an angry beehive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Trump’s not stupid...they want him to fall into a line of questioning that all Republicans fall for...

1. what are you going to do about the debt?

-> Reduce it

2. what programs are you going to cut?

-> babies and children will die

by saying that he won’t be here it gives them no ammo...lol


118 posted on 12/06/2018 7:22:19 AM PST by willyd (I for one welcome our NSA overlords)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: OIFVeteran
It hasn't been anything more than lip service for Republicans since Reagan.

No. The Contract With America House Republicans, led by Gingrich and Armey, actually balanced the budget, which Reagan never did. They were then moving towards market oriented reform of Medicare when Clinton, who was being dragged down by accumulating scandals, moved decisively left, ceased triangulating, and bunkered in with the hard core progressive wing of the Democratic Party, who were prepared to ignore the scandals as long as he toed the line on their agenda.

Bush 43 actually campaigned in 2004 for Social Security reform with private investment accounts, full funding and inheritability. There were never enough Republican votes in the Senate to break a filibuster so the Bush proposals never got much traction, but the commitment was clear.

Then came the Great Recession and Obama, who added a trillion dollars to baseline spending in his first year and made trillion dollar deficits routine. And now we have Trump, who shows no sign of concern with the question. Despite that, rank and file Republicans on the Hill would support entitlement reform if they saw a path to passage.

119 posted on 12/06/2018 7:23:44 AM PST by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

You’re right, the numbers have no meaning.

I have no practical idea at all what 21 trillion is.

It may as well be infinity.


120 posted on 12/06/2018 7:38:08 AM PST by chris37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-130 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson