Who uses Google for that?
There were studies that suggested Google’s prejudicial oppression of conservative content and voices swung the election 1% to the left.
Reason 316 why Google is not welcome, in any form, into my home.
On a related issue about bias online, I went to the online Webster dictionary to look up the definition of the old-time English insult ‘mountebank’ (frauds and swindlers) and here are the examples of usage provided. Bias against conservatives, indeed:
Examples of mountebank in a Sentence -
Recent Examples on the Web:
He was ignored on almost every major issue by the incredible cast of fools and mountebanks with whom the president* has surrounded himself. — Charles P. Pierce, Esquire, “The Rex Tillerson Story Is Full of Holes,” 13 Mar. 2018
Laying it off on senior administration officials will no longer fly given the liars, hustlers, incompetents, poseurs and mountebanks who dominate this West Wing. — David Zurawik, baltimoresun.com, “Press gives Trump ‘fake news’ ammo when it predicts things that don’t come to pass,” 9 Mar. 2018
These example sentences are selected automatically from various online news sources to reflect current usage of the word ‘mountebank.’ Views expressed in the examples do not represent the opinion of Merriam-Webster or its editors. Send us feedback.
I doubt that “Google employees debated whether to bury conservative media outlets in the company’s search function”
My guess is that the debate was just over the best way to do it, and how to get away doing it.
Search at FR is your friend
In the debates, when Hitlery said:”Google it.” I knew the fix was in. I rechecked some facts I saw the week before, and...LO! They were GONE! Replaced with irrefutable, SNOPES verified BS.
How could that be? </sarc>
I admit to not knowing what the term ‘docksing(sp)’ means, but I am curious what all those weasels at google would do, if, as an academic exercise in thought only, all the conservatives in the nation chipped ONE DOLLAR AND NO MORE, to hire a private investigator to obtain just ONE snapshot of each of the employees, as they were, oh say, at the hair place, the gas station, the supermarket, a cinema, a mall, or wherever they just might happen to be found, and then publish all the pictures at once?
Mind you, I did not mention any activity which would breach their “privacy”.
Gooebbelggle or any variation where you can fit Goebbels name in it because the censorship they’re committing would of made him proud.
I admit to not knowing what the term ‘docksing(sp)’ means, but I am curious what all those weasels at google would do, if, as an academic exercise in thought only, all the conservatives in the nation chipped ONE DOLLAR AND NO MORE, to hire a private investigator to obtain just ONE snapshot of each of the employees, as they were, oh say, at the hair place, the gas station, the supermarket, a cinema, a mall, or wherever they just might happen to be found, and then publish all the pictures at once?
Mind you, I did not mention any activity which would breach their “privacy”.
I buried Google. I use duckduckgo now.
They have done it.
Further, they keep posting liberal crap in their news feed I would prefer to ignore - like the great “Read my lips Bush” demise.
I stopped using Google at least 2 years ago.
Start typing “Infowars”, slowly, letter by letter, into Google and see how many letters it takes before Infowars is suggested.
Then try the same with Bing, DuckDuckgo, and Yahoo.
You’ll have your answer as to whether Google is ‘adjusting’ search results if you do that.
So they don’t really do it, they just talked about it? Yeah, who believes that? Facebook is fair-minded about conservatives and respects everybody, too—in the land of NOT.