Sens. Dianne Feinstein and Kamala Harris push White House for deal on judicial nominees

The Washington Times ^ | November 19, 2018 | Gabriella Munoz

[jazusamo]

Sens. Dianne Feinstein and Kamala Harris, both members of the Judiciary Committee, called on the White House Monday to make a deal to fill court vacancies.

~snip~

They offered accepting Judge James Rogan, a Trump pick, as long as their choice — Judge Lucy Koh — is also confirmed. They also proposed that each party select a nominee from the other’s list to confirm.

[klsparrow]

Sens. Feinstein and Harris, of the Judiciary Committee, the WH Monday to make a deal to fill court vacancies. Offered to accept Judge Rogan,a Trump pick, as long as their choice Judge Koh is confirmed. Each party to select a nominee from the other’s list to confirm who is that dumb?

[DoughtyOne]

So true...

[sarge83]

We have the votes, the can coitus themselves and their fellow horse that road in with them.

[grobdriver]

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAhahahahahahahahahahaha! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !.....

This is something G.W. might have done, trying to be all bi-partisan and such... but President Trump? HELL NO.

[5th MEB]

Make that every 1500 miles of REAL WALL and I will consider it.

[StAnDeliver]

Well, DiFi, you’re off the Christmas card list after Trump tells Kim Chi to pound sushi.

[Stanwood_Dave]

"Then in 2018 whoever gets the most senators gets to confirm."

Yea, but according to that witch or is it that bitch on Joy Behar on The View, "Republicans won the U.S. Senate seats only because of Gerrymandering."

“It is better to be thought a fool and remain silent, than to speak up and remove all doubt.” {Attention Joy Behar of the View} Abraham Lincoln 16th president of US (1809 - 1865.)

[5th MEB]

Just FUND IT my ASS, we can talk AFTER IT IS BUILT FROM THE PACIFIC OCEAN TO THE GULF OF MEXICO!

I have seen to many things “funded” that NEVER GET DONE!

[rlmorel]

Heh, I was going to put “Chutzpah” in there too, but I always feel that somehow I will misspell it or use it incorrectly!

But your post defines them to a “T”...

[Missouri gal]

Kamala Harris should be in jail for her attacks on Center for Medical Progress, the Planned Parenthood whistle-blowers, while she was Attorney General for California. I agree about Feinstein. She should be thrown off the Judiciary committee and out of the senate for that matter. There appears to be no such thing as a Democrat who respects the law.

[Verginius Rufus]

Today’s the anniversary of Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address, but I don’t remember that line as being part of it.

[FLT-bird]

Ha Ha Ha Ha! No. How about President Trump picks all the nominees and the Turtle rams them all through. You Kamala and DiFi can just shove it. How about that?

[wiseprince]

Just no...this stuff has to stop. The president nominates, the Senate confirms. Don’t like someone, vote them down. Don’t have the votes...too bad

[Figment]

Did these two idiots see the numbers in the senate elections?

[Lysandru]

After the Kavanaugh Debacle, Feinstein should be told where to go and what to do with herself when she gets there. We owe her no favors.

[wiseprince]

Blackburn, 100%

[SunkenCiv]

Guess again.

[Trump20162020]

Anything proposed by Kamala Harris should be instantly discarded. That woman is cuckoo and openly insinuates ICE is the KKK.

[familyop]

A big no to that. No picks based on sex, race or any other unreasonable basis. Nominate the best man for protecting our Second Amendment, and leave the illogical paradigm behind.

Don Willett would probably be the best choice, unless there's a law against non-Catholics being Supreme Court justices. I've done quite a bit of research. The very few who would highly likely support the Second Amendment (not only hunting/sports) are good with the other important constitutional issues and would not be judicial activists.

Support any candidate with sole reliance on the abortion issue at your peril. There lie some stealth socialists from feminist allegiances. They're against abortion, alright, with the understanding that men and marriage are the "root" of the problem. I've researched those organizations thoroughly, too.

[familyop]

There is no woman candidate for now with anywhere near the experience of the very few best candidates who are men. They just don’t have enough decisions behind them to be reliably originalist in regards to the Constitution. Keep that in mind.