Posted on 11/11/2018 12:47:56 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
November 5, 2018 (American Thinker) – In the 1960s, an informed but naïve undergraduate, I was walking across the campus of the University of Pennsylvania with the Chairman of the Chemistry Department, Prof. Charles C. Price. He told me that he was president of the United World Federalists, and asked if I knew what that organization was. When I said that I did not, he replied that they believed in a one-world government that would grow out of the United Nations. I was nonplussed as I had never heard anyone suggest that idea before. To me, the United Nations was a benevolent organization dedicated to pressuring the world community in the direction of peace, and to operating charitable programs to help the struggling, impoverished peoples of the world. I imagined the UN as a kind of United Way on a worldwide scale.
How would Prof. Price's vision of a new world government emerge? Although there was a socialistic thread in its founding document, the United Nations was formed based on a vision of human rights presented in the "Universal Declaration of Human Rights" (UDHR) which placed the concept of rights at the forefront for the progress of the world body. And rights are the mainstay for uplifting human freedom and the dignity of the individual. The UDHR document followed many amazing documents that presented rights as the central concept of the post-feudal world: the English Declaration (or Bill) of Rights of 1689, the U.S. Declaration of Independence with its important and forceful assertion of inalienable natural rights, the powerful U.S. Bill of Rights enacted in 1791, and the French Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen (1789).
The word "rights" appears in almost every sentence of the 1869-word UN document. The document is literally obsessed with rights, and one must assume they are likewise obsessed with the rights successes as manifested in the United Kingdom, the U.S., and France. However, there are some deviations from the rights usage we are all familiar with. In Article 3, Instead of the inalienable rights of "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness" found in our Declaration of Independence, the UN declares everyone's right to "life, liberty and security of person." Are they implying that security will bring happiness? Or are they implying that happiness is too ephemeral a value, and too Western? Perhaps more mundane survival goals are needed by most of the world.
Yeah its time for them to go back to brussels or dubai or wherever the fuch they wanna go.
UN OUT OF US...
I'd like them out in less than 12 minutes but would settle for 12 months.
Twitters color, Hitlery’s color, Demoncrats color = UNs color...no coincidences.
Yeah, I left off possessives...forgive me.
A simple google will show it, albeit mostly through a laundered point of view. GHWB managed to wangle a resolution to support Gulf War I through it. It hasn’t been “nothing.” But it has had screamingly inglorious moments like when Che Guevara was allowed to rant in it on behalf of Cuba.
Just being factual.
I was just going to say, this one world government thing, sounds like it is right out of the book of Revelation.
The UN’s Greatest triumph:
Trick or treat for UNICEF.
The rest has been all trick, no treat.
This is ok.
I’ll still be in fighting shape for the next 12 years.
So. Yeah. Do that.
.
Guess what UN!
Yeshua comes to gather his bride at the end of the 70th Sabbath, in the fall of 2024.
That will be the end of all “kingdoms of men,” especially the foolish idea of men ruling the world.
Suck up buttercup!
.
Even if they have done nothing good, I work with several lefties that are waiting for a one world government. They have a Utopian vision where everything is free and everything us perfect. I don’t talk to them much. They lack the ability to reason.
When “the One who restrains” (the Holy Spirit) is “taken out of the way” we’d see this and more.
One puzzle to me is what ever happens to America in the Revelation. The New World simply isn’t mentioned in unambiguous terms. All the big action has centered back in the Old World.
Here’s where I’ve dabbled in prophecy and just suppose this — that America immediately pre-rapture turns out to have a faith revolution like has never been seen. God will have seeded the whole place with the elect, no matter how unlikely it seemed. Now, poof, they’re gone. All that’s left to hold the fort is some animistic American Indians who don’t want the old white man ways. Result: America supremely unimportant.
And my head boggles like mad at the notion. And it’s a wild guess based on circumstance. God forgive me if I am way, WAY wrong here.
To all those (most;y on the left) that laugh at us who say “our thoughts and prayers are with you” because we beleive in God................well our thoughts and prayers are with you” as you go through the 7 year tribulation the Bible talks about when the one world government takes place. Bible said it 2000 years ago, I beleive it and those that reject it are so...well thoughts and prayers to you all
I can’t.
They made English the international air traffic control language. 😁😆 I don’t know how that helped me, as a controller, but beyond that, I can’t think of anything they have done right. 👎
Many people on this forum, posting today actively worked to help bring this about.
Pretty ambiguous statement, there, Mr Edd....why don’t you fortify it with some actual facts and back up?
Sounds like the lib version of ‘Many people say that so and so does such and such’.
George HW Bush signed US up for this.
.
>> “If Jesus returns for His Church, the UN will probably have their way shortly thereafter.” <<
Do you even own a Bible?
When Yeshua returns, that is the end of all governments of men. The 10 days after his return will be the bowl judgements, where fire will fall from the sky along with asteroids as big as islands.
Its not far off.
If there ever is a “one world government” it will be ruled by muslims who make up the largest block of the UN General Assembly.
Most of the member countries can’t or won’t adhere to much of anything in the UN’s vision. The UN’s vision is as incompatible with Islam as it is with Christianity or our Constitution.
.
>> “George HW Bush signed US up for this.” <<
Nah! President Wilson signed us up, and then went to bed for 6 months while his wife and Colonal House did all the dirty work.
Teddy Rosevelt set us up for the Wilson admin.
Of course the United Nations (of Islam) want global domination.
Allah wouldn’t have it any other way.
That way we can all be turd world backwards shitholes oppressed by allah.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.