I wasn’t ready to go that far, but the very fact the internet was wiped clean @July 8th, tells me this was the kind of op that has been run time and again by the Dems. I went back and watched Judge Thomas’ angry statement at his hearing. The same people probably orchestrated that shameful takedown. The culture hadn’t become as debased so they didn’t go so far as waving a penis at a party (as if Thomas behaved like a frat boy ever! He’s a very dignified man, made of stronger stock than BK who is the quintessential all-American boy, refreshing to see these days).
The difference between the Clarence Thomas hearings and the Brett Kavanaugh hearings is that the Dems had no second or third accusers with Thomas. They lost that one, and probably realized with Kavanaugh, that in order to get him to withdraw, or destroy his nomination, they would need more than one accuser. Strength in numbers. Then when the realized the extra bimbos wasn’t working, they went down another road: drinking, blackouts, passing out...etc.
Monica McLean’s internet history was also scrubbed from July 8 back to 2009. They could not scrub the wine-tasting photo because it belonged to the newspaper.9
The same people probably orchestrated that shameful takedown.
You are correct. Ricki Seidman is on audio for the American Constitution Society on July 10th talking about a strategy that will emerge derailing Kvanaughs confirmation. Then you can google Ricki Seidman. It starts about 22.57 at about 25.37 is where she talks about a strategy. I think this is what we are seeing now.
https://soundcloud.com/user-686155846/supreme-court-nominee-whats-next