Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kavanaugh pens Op-ed: I Am an Independent, Impartial Judge 'Yes I was emotional'
Wall Street Journal ^ | Oct 4, 2018 | Brett Kavanaugh

Posted on 10/04/2018 4:56:53 PM PDT by CondoleezzaProtege

I was deeply honored to stand at the White House July 9 with my wife, Ashley, and my daughters, Margaret and Liza, to accept President Trump’s nomination to succeed my former boss and mentor, Justice Anthony Kennedy, on the Supreme Court. My mom, Martha—one of the first women to serve as a Maryland prosecutor and trial judge, and my inspiration to become a lawyer—sat in the audience with my dad, Ed.

That night, I told the American people who I am and what I believe. I talked about my 28-year career as a lawyer, almost all of which has been in public service. I talked about my 12 years as a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, often called the second most important court in the country, and my five years of service in the White House for President George W. Bush. I talked about my long record of advancing and promoting women, including as a judge—a majority of my 48 law clerks have been women—and as a longtime coach of girls’ basketball teams.

As I explained that night, a good judge must be an umpire—a neutral and impartial arbiter who favors no political party, litigant or policy. As Justice Kennedy has stated, judges do not make decisions to reach a preferred result. Judges make decisions because the law and the Constitution compel the result. Over the past 12 years, I have ruled sometimes for the prosecution and sometimes for criminal defendants, sometimes for workers and sometimes for businesses, sometimes for environmentalists and sometimes for coal miners. In each case, I have followed the law. I do not decide cases based on personal or policy preferences...

(Excerpt) Read more at wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Editorial; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: confirmed; confirmhimnow; justicekavanaugh; kavanaugh; nomoredelay; scotus; wsj
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-126 next last
To: CondoleezzaProtege

Probably appropriate but for these Democrats, apologies are just taken as an opening to attack.


21 posted on 10/04/2018 5:11:44 PM PDT by Behind the Blue Wall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

I can’t remember anything he said that he shouldn’t have said.


22 posted on 10/04/2018 5:12:20 PM PDT by murron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

I can’t remember anything he said that he shouldn’t have said.


23 posted on 10/04/2018 5:12:20 PM PDT by murron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trumpisourlastchance

This should have been written after he was confirmed.


24 posted on 10/04/2018 5:12:23 PM PDT by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519

Maybe that will help Flakey climb down off the “he’s struggling” ledge.


25 posted on 10/04/2018 5:12:56 PM PDT by Qiviut (McCain & Obama's Legacy in two words: DONALD TRUMP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: murron

Probably the part about the “revenge of the clintons”.

Even though it’s true.


26 posted on 10/04/2018 5:13:45 PM PDT by zeebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

I realize he’s got incredible respect for the justice he clerked for, but I’d dare him to find the constitutional links for some of Kennedy’s decisions.

So honestly, his repeated links back to Kennedy’s words which did not always match his actions, leaves me more than a bit nervous that he’s going to go Kennedy.

Then again, considering the great lengths that liberals have gone to bias a future sitting justice against their many causes, he might actually do what Kennedy did not, and truly take such a viewpoint that the court is not there as an activist nor law maker, but an adjudicator of if laws meet constitutional muster.


27 posted on 10/04/2018 5:13:52 PM PDT by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

No paywall for this article.

Thank you Brett Stephens and WSJ.


28 posted on 10/04/2018 5:14:54 PM PDT by Ravi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

Mark Levin just read it.


29 posted on 10/04/2018 5:16:01 PM PDT by RushIsMyTeddyBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trumpisourlastchance
"He didn’t need to do this."

Agree, and this might dampen some of the fire that has been building on the Right for the November elections.

30 posted on 10/04/2018 5:16:11 PM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: kingu

He will be to the right of Kennedy. Somewhere between Thomas and Roberts


31 posted on 10/04/2018 5:16:31 PM PDT by Ravi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: RoseofTexas

If mob rule determines how Senators vote on issues we no longer have a country, that simple


32 posted on 10/04/2018 5:16:37 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

It made me so angry to see the Kavanaughs with grim faces walking to the committee hearing, vs. how happy they were on the day the nomination was revealed. And the Left is still gonna be after him after he hopefully gets sworn in - but hearing the name “Justice Kavanaugh” time after time will drive them even more loony than they are now, so there’s that.


33 posted on 10/04/2018 5:16:50 PM PDT by GnuThere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

Ugh, apologies.

I mean I guess if he had to write it to win over a few votes, but the last thing conservatives need these days is to be apologizing for anything.

So he is essentially offering an apology to the very RINO’s who helped put him in this awful position.


34 posted on 10/04/2018 5:17:14 PM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

He better not be impartial after we went through all of this. I want a bitter, hanging judge out for revenge.


35 posted on 10/04/2018 5:17:35 PM PDT by Mozzafiato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Truth29

I think he did.

This was a sly move to get Flake, Collins and Murkowski on board.

Possibly Manchin.


36 posted on 10/04/2018 5:17:58 PM PDT by Ravi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969

Yep take this arrow for the team so I can be on the supreme Court.


37 posted on 10/04/2018 5:19:23 PM PDT by Ravi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

“I revere the Constitution. I believe that an independent and impartial judiciary is essential to our constitutional republic. If confirmed by the Senate to serve on the Supreme Court, I will keep an open mind in every case and always strive to preserve the Constitution of the United States and the American rule of law.”

AHAAAAAAAA! Vote Kava-NAAWW!

Just wait ‘til the SNL skits!


38 posted on 10/04/2018 5:19:38 PM PDT by Eleutheria5 (“If you are not prepared to use force to defend civilization, then be prepared to accept barbarism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: myerson

Agreed, never apologize..he did nothing wrong in how he testified.


39 posted on 10/04/2018 5:20:20 PM PDT by tina07 (In loving memory of my father,WWII Vet. CBI 10/16/42-12/17/45, d. 11/1/85)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Trumpisourlastchance

He didn’t need to do this, but the fact that he did proves that he’s a truly humble and honorable man.


40 posted on 10/04/2018 5:20:21 PM PDT by RooRoobird20 ("Democrats haven't been this angry since Republicans freed the slaves.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-126 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson