Posted on 10/02/2018 11:11:11 AM PDT by bitt
A former prosecutor details dozens of as yet unanswered questions the FBI should ask Ford and others regarding her allegation against Kavanaugh.
I am a former prosecutor, a father of three daughters, a brother to five sisters. I’ve drawn up a list of questions relevant to the FBI investigation of Christine Blasey Ford’s sexual assault allegation against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.
Several, including the first ones, are for the FBI to answer. The rest are for the FBI to ask of Ford and others, including her parents and her siblings. The FBI may not read this, of course, but it may help you assess the FBI’s work and Ford’s credibility. It can be difficult for any of us to remember an incident. And our memories can play tricks. As an examiner, all we can do is try to help the alleged witness remember what happened, with all five senses and the accompanying emotions.
I number these for reference. I have sought to avoid including any questions that appeared to have been answered already.
I won’t address why I’ve included each question, but let me describe the two groupings of questions.
First, there are a few questions on Ford’s knowledge of national current affairs and of Washington, D.C., affairs, and on her knowledge of Kavanaugh’s career. It may be that because she lives on the West Coast and works in a field unrelated to history, current events, journalism, law, and government, Ford may have been totally oblivious to Kavanaugh’s career. Until we know the answers to those questions, we don’t know. But a good prosecutor could line up one detail after another, and raise suspicions about why, after all of the national notoriety Kavanaugh received, especially after his nomination to the D.C. Circuit (that lasted three years), she raised no
(Excerpt) Read more at thefederalist.com ...
p
Because of the fear of the left, and fear of what liberal media and liberal politicians will say, legitimate questions such as raised here, will not be asked.
Anyone asking such questions will be portrayed as attacking a sexual assault Survivor.
The time of your post is very propitious. 11:11:11.
These 62 questions, if asked, would make it even more clear than it already is that Ford has no visual memory of this event because it is a story concocted to be purposely vague with the only “memories” those required to stop Kavanaugh.
Too many one's....
Frankenstein stated today, we must keep the FBI report secret. She cited instances of her keeping secrets. She mentioned KAV's decision on “assault” weapons, changing the subject from “Dr.Fraud”. The Lady doth protest too much.
My conclusion: the leak is her staff; the contentions of the i(D)iots are falling apart based on reported witnesses' statements. IMHO, these opinions of mine bode well for the 7th KAV investigation!.
62. Your letter to Sen. Feinstein says the boys “scrapped” and laughed in the bedroom. Yet your Senate written testimony omits the word “scrapped.” Is it possible that you mistook normal teenage fun, horseplay, carousing, and “scrapping” for sexual assault? Were you joining the boys in their playful “scrapping”?
How about a really basic question: What did the bed look like? Twin size, full, queen, king, bunk beds, trundle or day bed? Was it fancy and plush or simple and Spartan? Did it have a comforter or blanket? Solid color or patterned?
Surely, someone who was supposedly attacked and thrown onto a bed would remember that, right?
Posted on 10/2/2018, 11:11:11 AM by bitt
bkmk
Perhaps she was tossed onto a glass coffee table and it broke, leaving shards of glass in her back. Oh wait, that was Jackie’s story about a fraternity gang rape at UVa a few years ago.
While these questions would be interesting to get answers to, they are only important if there is an actual event tied to them. There is no event in this inquisition. It’s totally made up.
Oh sure, there may have been parties like this, but Ford isn’t credible. She has concocted a story. If she is asked these questions, her likely answers will be much like Hillary’s were: “I don’t recall.”
Ford says she has PTSD, and that she was so traumatized by almost being sexually assaulted, that she told no one, and repressed the memories for many, many years. She a psychologist, right? Well then, she should know that people who suffer from PTSD don’t repress their traumatic experiences, they live with them every day, to the point that they are debilitated from having a normal regular life.
She’s a liar through and through. She will continue making this fantasy ever more believable if she asked these questions. It would clarify nothing that hasn’t been clarified already. The reason she doesn’t remember certain details isn’t because those details are repressed. It’s because this “traumatic” event never happened.
Yes, and she is also a fruit loop.
That too.
The FBI has completed their investigation. The owner of the house had a dog named Brett, but the dog died about thirty years ago and cannot be interviewed.
FBI won’t even question Ford... don’t want to accidently catch her lying.
sigh
See #17.
Apparently ...1:11:11 AM...escapes you.
Meant PM
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.