Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Christine Blasey Ford and the mysterious case of the missing : Why her story makes no sense
American Thinker ^ | 09/28/2018 | Ed Straker

Posted on 09/28/2018 8:27:18 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

There was a subtle fact to be learned from Christine Blasey Ford's testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee yesterday. No, not merely that she lied about being afraid to fly on airplanes so she could delay the hearing as long as possible.

I'm referring to the mysterious incident in the bathroom. Press reports indicated that she claimed that Brett Kavanaugh "corralled" her into an upstairs bedroom. Now we have more detail: that Ms. Ford went to an upstairs bathroom, and when she came out, Kavanaugh dragged her into a bedroom.

My question is, why did Ms. Ford use an upstairs bathroom? Nearly all suburban homes near country clubs in America have bathrooms on the ground floor. Perhaps it was occupied, but Ms. Ford, who clearly remembers going to the bathroom, didn't even mention its existence.

If there had been a bathroom on the ground floor, as seems likely, and Ms. Ford could have used it, then there was no reason for her to use a bathroom upstairs. The only reason for Ms. Ford to go upstairs would be to go to a bedroom, with someone at this party.

This is what I believe is most likely to have occurred.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: christineford; kavanaugh; sexualassault
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-118 next last
To: Beatthedrum

I think she did exactly what she was told, especially in light of the report I saw earlier where she met with the Senate Republicans last night and told them she wouldn’t even be able to get a search warrant — let alone an indictment — based on the allegation as it was presented to her.


61 posted on 09/28/2018 9:16:28 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("The Russians escaped while we weren't watching them ... like Russians will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil

I hope someone does investigate this “crime” and finally puts to bed (no pun intended...who am I kidding, YES its intended!) this stupid stupid issue.


62 posted on 09/28/2018 9:17:50 AM PDT by N8VTXNinWV (Proud Pajama Patrol Member since 2001.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: 50mm

I think you’re on to something, but unfortunately the only person who has any grounds to pursue a complaint against Katz would be Buzzy Ford.


63 posted on 09/28/2018 9:18:02 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("The Russians escaped while we weren't watching them ... like Russians will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA

Nicely done


64 posted on 09/28/2018 9:19:40 AM PDT by RWGinger (Does anyone else really)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil
Recent pictures of Hillary and Dr. Ford’s lawyer have surfaced.
I have no doubt they have been in contact.
Two of Ford’s lawyers have Soros Connections.

We knew leftists had spun a web of evil but until Donald Trump stepped up to fight them they never revealed how big it is.


65 posted on 09/28/2018 9:19:47 AM PDT by Vlad The Inhaler (Liberalism is the philosophy of sniveling brats. - P.J. ORourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Some other questions...

Was she a member of the country club?
Was she planning to swim AFTER the party?
Did she swim before the party and was wearing
a wet bathing suit under her cloths?

Inquiring minds want to know...


66 posted on 09/28/2018 9:19:48 AM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

I’m not a lawyer. Perhaps a FReeper lawyer could chime in about how we can get this investigated by the Bar.


67 posted on 09/28/2018 9:21:36 AM PDT by 50mm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: 50mm

Working for Feinstein is one thing (bad enough on its own) but it would be nice to know who is paying. Follow the money. It always leads to interesting places.


68 posted on 09/28/2018 9:21:44 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Starboard
Working for Feinstein is one thing (bad enough on its own) but it would be nice to know who is paying. Follow the money. It always leads to interesting places.

The answer to that is in Kavanaugh's opening statement:

This whole two-week effort has been a calculated and orchestrated political hit, fueled with apparent pent-up anger about President Trump and the 2016 election, fear that has been unfairly stoked about my judicial record, revenge on behalf of the Clintons and millions of dollars in money from outside left-wing opposition groups.

You can bet that the money in question is laundered Soros money.

69 posted on 09/28/2018 9:28:09 AM PDT by 50mm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: x
It's a vivid but false memory that she has come to believe over time.

I distinctly remember that Crappie weighed 8 pounds, if only I had went to an official weigh station.



70 posted on 09/28/2018 9:28:18 AM PDT by itsahoot (Welcome to the New USA where Islam is a religion of peace and Christianity is a mental disorder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: 50mm
I don't think we can. My guess is that the only course of action in the case of a lawyer with a conflict of interest is for one of the two parties involved in the conflict (Feinstein or Ford) to pursue the complaint.

Keep in mind that even if I'm wrong about this, a Senate confirmation process is not likely to be considered a major proceeding that would even warrant any examination in the event of a conflict of interest. Ford wasn't a litigant in a civil court case or a defendant in a criminal case, and she would have suffered no loss of any kind no matter how the proceedings turned out.

71 posted on 09/28/2018 9:28:25 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("The Russians escaped while we weren't watching them ... like Russians will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: 50mm

Agree. The polygraph was also highly suspect. Only two questions. Yet she said she was stressed by the ordeal. If you’re being honest and truthful, there’s no need for any anxiety whatsoever.

The examiner was also shady. Probably got a nice paycheck for his “expertise”.


72 posted on 09/28/2018 9:32:43 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

Nope. Ford was under oath and under penalty of felony. If Katz was there as Ford’s lawyer, she had a duty to protect Ford. If she was there as Fineswine’s lawyer while letting Ford believe she was representing her, that is unethical and probably criminal.


73 posted on 09/28/2018 9:34:15 AM PDT by 50mm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I expect that they have or had a pre-arranged deal with someone at the FBI, who would have made sure their investigation went on at least as long as the Mueller investigation into “Russian collusion”.

They felt very confident that the FBI would be sure the Kavanaugh confirmation was delayed at least until after the mid-terms, if not forever.

JMHO


74 posted on 09/28/2018 9:41:56 AM PDT by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

She s a PhD psychologist and is totally ignorant of the polygraph. Unbelievable.


75 posted on 09/28/2018 9:43:41 AM PDT by myerson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Starboard
I don't believe there was a polygraph. I believe they hooked her up with some wires while pretending to conduct a polygraph. That's why the 'rats refused to present the examiner or the polygraph tape itself for examination. All that was produced was the "signed examiner's report" about two questions and saying the examiner thought she was "truthful." For all we know the "examiner" is a buddy of Katz's and on Fineswine's payroll.

When things don't make sense you should always suspect it's because the 'rats did something nefarious.

76 posted on 09/28/2018 9:44:04 AM PDT by 50mm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: 50mm

You can find a polygraph operator who will give you any result you want.


77 posted on 09/28/2018 9:46:52 AM PDT by myerson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: 50mm

A polygraph exam involves many questions designed to produce a baseline. They ask questions they know you’ll answer truthfully to find out what your vital signs are when you tell the truth and maybe questions that they figure you’ll lie about to see what your vitals are when you lie. So I could see them asking only two questions and calling it a valid polygraph when it really wasn’t, because there was no baseline established.


78 posted on 09/28/2018 9:47:50 AM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

And Blumenthal likewise impeached Ford’s testimony on the same principle.


79 posted on 09/28/2018 9:48:41 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #80 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-118 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson