To: Lazamataz
Anita Hill had corroborative witnesses. Ford had nothing. It was a half-hearted attempt by the Democrats.
4,454 posted on
09/27/2018 12:33:11 PM PDT by
AppyPappy
(How many fingers am I holding up, Winston?)
To: AppyPappy
Anita Hill had NO corroborating witnesses. She testified that everything Clarence Thomas did to her was done when there was nobody else present. By definition, this meant that she could NOT have any corroborating witnesses.
4,495 posted on
09/27/2018 12:36:00 PM PDT by
Alberta's Child
("The Russians escaped while we weren't watching them ... like Russians will)
To: AppyPappy
Anita Hill had corroborative witnesses. Ford had nothing. It was a half-hearted attempt by the Democrats.
Yet they've managed to completely outmaneuver the Republicans. Grassley needs to step down as chair of the judiciary committee. He isn't competent to handle the business of that post.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson