Posted on 09/25/2018 4:03:19 PM PDT by detective
Shortened title.
Full tile: Document Expert: Multiple Discrepancies Discovered in Senator Feinsteins Christine Ford Letter Looks Like a Fraud
Another Internet sleuth released a series of tweets that are damning to the letter provided by Senator Feinstein from Dr. Ford who accused Judge Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct nearly 40 years ago.
The Internet is the place where individuals with different backgrounds and skill sets are able to combine their efforts to address the many lies in the MSM today. This happens all the time and the MSM hates it when their lies are uncovered or questioned.
Yesterday Dr. Dannielle (Dossy) Blumenthal released a series of tweets that dissect and refute the letter provided by Senator Feinstein from the accuser of Judge Kavanaugh. Dr. Fords letter is full of flaws which lead one to realize something just doesnt add up!
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
I wouldn’t put much stock in the document experts’ conclusion. I’ve known many talented professionals that were sloppy writers. That’s why they hire good secretaries.
If not, someone perpetrated a fraud.
I think Bill Ayers does most of the fake writing for Progressives ... Dan (Fake by Accurate) Rather just authenticates it for the Marxist State Media and 60 Minutes.
This is the first time I have read it.
She says Judge was periodically jumping on Kavanaugh then she says Judge was across the room yelling and then Judge jumps on the Bed which tumbles them all off.
Doesn’t really make much sense. Also I did notice the 3rd line where his name is typed is giant compared to the rest of the letter. I also noted she never actually described any assault to me - he tried to disrobe me and he had his hand on my mouth.
If someone was attacking you would you use the words disrobe? Who talks like that.
I am sorry but this does not sound like assault to me.
Stay tuned for Friday's dramatic conclusion.
Read it. Definitely oddly structured.
My husband just mentioned that this letter is pretty short and was wondering what information was redacted.
Has anyone seen the redacted letter for comparison?
I see that his copy of the letter is addressed to Feinstein, but the reporting has been that it was sent originally to Eschoo and passed on by her to Feinstein, and that’s what Carr’s understanding was when he was talking about it this afternoon - the point about it being misdelivered is a good one - if it was sent on to Feinstein, does that mean it became a legal document right away, or is there immunity because it went somewhere else first - all very mysterious.....
No surprise here — I think we all knew it was a “made-up story” to begin with.
No way did Maxine have anything to do with that letter. I have proof...NOWHERE in the letter does it say “Impeach 45” And that is the only thing Maxine knows.
Has Ford’s cross country Gumball Rally started yet? It sometimes appears like she doesn’t want to testify at all...
She will cancel tomorrow bank on it!!!
They should expel her from being a professor at Stanford for writing such a bad letter.
I find it to be a YUGE gaping hole in any investigation/analysis. Where was Brennan and what did he do and know?
Doctor.
Sounds like a flag football game.
What? No signature? If an email, no header? Style errors? Grammatical errors? Such a purposeful mess!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.