Posted on 09/23/2018 7:29:46 AM PDT by Raebie
Very interesting.
https://twitter.com/seanmdav/status/1043697136049766401?s=19
“How is it that a committee member can withhold information from other members?”
I don’t think they can. But, who will enforce it? Grassley? He’s a eunuch.
If they can bring it up as something as evidence about Judge Kavanaugh’s character when he was in High School, then her character in high school is also relevant.
If CBF alleged that someone raped her recently, her past history would not be relevant.
How she conducted herself around the time of the alleged assault most definitely IS relevant.
Ah, put that in common English, please.
Huh???????
Wait, so she can lie under oath...? And nothing happens....? I t hint not...
“If they can bring it up as something as evidence about Judge Kavanaugh’s character when he was in High School, then her character in high school is also relevant.”
Please explain why Ford’s character in high school is relevant. I would say her character now, and the character of the political operatives who are running this charade is what’s important in this matter.
Kavanaugh is saying he didn’t do what she’s accusing him of. We have to support him in that denial.
If he didn’t do it, what does it matter whether she was a nun in training or the whore of Babylon? He’s not saying he did it but she was such a little slut that who could blame him.
Where do you read I said call her a slut?! No name calling but her drinking and partying are an issue. Many young woman drink and attend parties without being a slut. But it does affect their actions and the message others perceive. We can agree to disagree.
Although I would like to hear her deny the yearbook comment of sexual encounters with 54 guys before college. But that is just me.
LOL,
That “Aldrich Ames” picture is a picture of Paul Rhys, who starred in the TV show about the Ames case!
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt3338790/
“Where do you read I said call her a slut?! No name calling but her drinking and partying are an issue.”
I apologize if it seemed that I was putting words in your mouth. Of course you didn’t call her that. We can certainly agree to disagree here.
I don’t think it would be a good strategy to bring out her yearbook, or talk about her drunken partying or any of that. None of that should have any bearing on the charges, because as I have said repeatedly even drunken girls with flimsy morals have a right to not be assaulted.
I would much rather talk about the political operatives she’s working with, the dubious reliability of recovered memories and the lack of any verifiable detail or witness.
Not to mention her smearing and defaming of Mark Judge - a private person who could be financially damaged by the accusation of participating in multiple felonies, including violent crimes. He should take her for every penny she has or could earn for the rest of her life. He has the exact same iron-clad witness testimony on record that Kavanaugh has.
“.....A plain reading of 18 USC 1001 suggests that in the matter of a specific presidential nomination pending before the U.S. Senate, statements made to a House member on that matter may not be covered by the statute’s prohibition on false statements....”
I think so too. This is carefully covering her from charges and she has not testified yet and may not do so in spite of everything.
DemonRat Senators, DNC, Dr. Christina Ford and her leftist hack attorneys CONSPIRING TO COMMIT A KOUP AGAINST KAVANAUGH!!!
Amen.
I read an article yesterday and buried in the article they mentioned how Feinstein had given Grassley the full letter on Thursday but it will not be available to the public. I do not know if she did or didn’t but on Friday Grassley was still asking for it.
“Feinstein gave the full letter to Grassley on Thursday, according to GOP and Democratic aides. Republicans have continued to harp on Feinstein for keeping the letter private, but she says she was honoring Ford’s wishes and, now that it is part Kavanaugh’s background check file, has declined to release it publicly.”
Agreed!
If the hearing goes ahead, the Republican majority should have Judge Jeanine doing the questioning!
As of this date Ford has made no formal complaint against Kavanaugh. Not to the relevant authorities. Not to the Senate Judicial Committee. No signed statements. No statement under oath. As of this time she is under no legal liability. If she were to appear she’ll probably refuse to take any oath or take the fifth.
Don’t you think that having sex with 54 boys before you’re even in college would indicate an unstable mind?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.