The Odious Intent Behind The Democratic Obsession To Get The FBI To Investigate Kavanaugh

Townhall ^ | Sep 20, 2018 2:05 PM | Matt Vespa

[rollo tomasi]

4 days was enough to delay this crap for Kavanaugh to face his accuser. Had they voted today, candidates would not have a bone to throw to the perpetual ignorant “outragers” (Who vote for Repubs sometimes and on the fence).

[Qiviut]

No matter how well intentioned, agents would have to include their subjective view of the information they collected, or the credibility of the witnesses they interviewed. This would inevitably corrupt the bureau and its agents, who are unelected career employees.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

The FBI is ALREADY corrupt.

[R_Kangel]

..... The Democrats know very well that this type of incident is not even the jurisdiction of the Federal Bureau of Investigation ..... The FBI only investigates Federal Crimes .... Not Drunken High School Party Incidents ...

.... These people and any Lawyer should know this ....... They are advancing talking points and propaganda to the Useful Idiots of the Democrat/Socialist Party for the coming protests, unrest, and mayhem they are planning for the Midterms ....

[MtnClimber]

The timing is suspect, but standard fare for democRATS. They did this to Clarence Thomas, Roy Moore, Ben Carson, Donald Trump, and Kavanaugh is the latest. Ted Kennedy (who killed a woman) smeared Robert Bork in different ways to prevent his confirmation to the Supreme Court. None of this is new. But, people should dismiss how all of this always happens to smear Republicans when the democRATs have all of the REAL problems with ethics.

[Flick Lives]

Okay, men, let’s fight this. I think lots of younger (and all ages of) men will have a little light go on that shows them the dark, slimy side of the women voters who vote feminist.
They want revenge on men. We males are guilty unless and until proven innocent (which no one can do. You can oppose a guilty verdict but how can you prove a non-action?).
Every old female friend or date is now a potential aggressor who can decide to destroy a man out of revenge. I hope there will be a huge backlash by males against this.

I for one welcome our new female robot overlords

[shanover]

Pure BS and so typical.

[SauronOfMordor]

Feminists don’t necessarily hate men. They just want POWER over men. They want the ability to destroy any man who annoys them, at whim. They want men to serve them, as obedient slaves.

[frank ballenger]

Robot units say all your base are belong to us.

Still you are being careful good idea.

[frank ballenger]

Oh, so no problem then. Still not very pleasant to contemplate.

[Freee-dame]

It also sends a message to all future conservative nominees: expect to be destroyed on your way to the Court.

...not just the Court, but any position requiring confirmation in the Trump administration. The left is made up of bullies and liars.

[Maskot]

They’re supposed to brainstorm and KNOW this whole movement against their own was not to take like kinda down. It was a setup from the beginning.

[Maskot]

I hope so too and I’m a woman! It’s all crap. Men are NOT the problem here. It’s feminists

[Alberta's Child]

They did brainstorm.

Why do you think Trump's first two Supreme Court nominees came from the same all-white, all-boys Georgetown Prep School?

The strategy isn't perfect, but it sure minimizes the chances for unexpected racial or sexual misconduct allegations from a former high school classmate.

[frank ballenger]

I welcome your support. I never mean to condemn all women when ones on FR are so tremendous. Thank you.

[Ciexyz]

Hold the vote tomorrow. Then prosecute this accuser for false testimony, and her lawyer and anyone else involved in this political conspiracy to ruin a person by false charges. Disbar the lawyer. Fire Joy Behar. If there isn’t a law against all this, enact one.

[Extremely Extreme Extremist]

Everyone needs to read Ed Whalen’s Twitter feed

[Maskot]

😊

[MarkL]

There was a booger-eating-moron lawyer who appeared on Tucker that kept saying over and over again, "if I were accused, I'd WANT the FBI to investigate me."

One very simple fact. It's not possible to prove a negative. It's impossible to prove that you did NOT assault someone. You can put up reasonable doubt. For instance, you were in a different place. But given the fact that they won't even tell the accused when he was supposed to have committed the assault, it's just another case of "East German justice." "Show me the man, I'll show you the crime."

The current FBI leadership cannot be trusted for anything.

Mark

[USCG SimTech]

Maybe someone should inform the DNC that their black hats in the intel industry that have been anchored in for them since Ike have been torn apart by Trump and primarily the white hats that helped get Trump in. No more business as usual with blackmailing and extortion using intel and planting false evidence.